Convergence rate
Named by 15 essays across 6 fields — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.
Getting pi by dropping needles on the floor
Throw a needle at a lined floor enough times, count how often it crosses a line, and pi falls out. There is no circle anywhere in the experiment.
How long until every one turns up
Draw at random from six equally likely kinds until all six have appeared. The wait is not six draws, and it is not sixty; it is fourteen point seven, and the number is a harmonic sum wearing a hat.
The sum that fits in one square
Half, then a quarter, then an eighth, forever. Adding infinitely many things sounds like it should give infinity, and the picture that says otherwise is a square with a corner left uncut.
How far from the average a thing can be
Knowing only an average and a spread — nothing about the shape, nothing about the number of outcomes, nothing about symmetry — the chance of landing three standard deviations out is at most one in nine. And there is a distribution that lands there exactly that often, so the bound cannot be improved.
The average settles and the wobble does not
Two theorems are usually met a page apart and sound as though one is a sharper version of the other. They are the same sums looked at through two different magnifying glasses: divide by the number of them and everything collapses to a point, divide by its square root and a shape appears.
A map that shrinks everything
One extra hypothesis — that every distance is shortened by at least a fixed factor — turns the existence of a fixed point into its uniqueness, an algorithm for finding it, and a bound on the error after any number of steps.
Counting what has no formula
There is no expression that gives the nth prime, and yet the number of primes below a bound is predictable to within a fraction of a per cent — by a function that is not a formula for the primes but an integral of the wrong-looking quantity.
How fast the bell arrives
The limit theorem says a standardised sum approaches the bell curve and says nothing about when. The rate is one over the square root of the number of terms, the constant in front is made of the third moment, and both are visible.
The same map in a better basis
Measured along its own invariant directions, a linear map stops shearing and becomes two independent stretches. Nothing about the map has changed; the grid it is described against has.
The error that does not care how many dimensions
A grid gets rapidly better in one dimension and hopelessly worse in twenty. Random points get better at the same slow rate whatever the dimension, which is why a method that is bad everywhere ends up being the only one that works.
Sampling where the answer lives
Monte Carlo error cannot be made to fall faster than the square root, so the only thing left to attack is the constant in front of it. Drawing points where the integrand is large, and dividing by how often they were drawn, leaves the answer alone and can shrink the noise many times over.
Points too even to be random
Independent random points clump, and the clumping is what makes the error fall only as the square root. Points chosen to be evenly spread rather than independently beat that rate, and the price is that nothing about them is random at all.
A tail too small to be a whole number
If e were a fraction with denominator q, then q! times e would be a whole number. It splits into a whole part and a tail, the tail is squeezed strictly between nothing and one, and there is no whole number there.
How fast the staircase arrives
The slope at a crossing decides whether an orbit reaches it. The same number decides how fast — and when the slope is zero the arithmetic changes kind, from a fixed factor per step to a doubling of the correct digits.
Too many orders to list
The rule is an average over every order the players could have arrived in. At seven players that is five thousand orders and at twenty it is more than there are seconds in the age of the universe — so the average is sampled, and the error falls at a rate that can be measured.
Named alongside it
The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.
VarianceApproximationExpectationMonte CarloSamplingIntegralConvergenceEstimator biasIndependenceIterationNormal distributionCentral limit theorem