What the figures prove
A dissection whose pieces overlap by two pixels looks exactly as convincing as one that works. A graph captioned as having an Eulerian circuit looks exactly like one that has an Eulerian circuit. The reader cannot tell, and for a long time neither could this site — a figure here carried a printed vertex degree that was simply wrong, through every gate, from the day it was written.
So the assertions are part of the drawing machinery, and the generators call them while drawing. A dissection must tile its target with no overlap, no gap and nothing outside it; congruent pieces must really be congruent; a quoted number must be computed from the drawing rather than typed beside it. A figure that does not prove its caption refuses to be drawn at all.
116 of 116 generator families reach an assertion. Between them they make 4964 distinct kinds of claim, tested 9139 times in the build that produced this page.
Every line below was collected by running each family at the parameters the essays actually use and recording what it asserted. A family that stops checking something loses its line here; a claim whose wording changes changes here with it. That is the only way this page is worth anything: a hand-written list of what code does drifts in exactly one direction, which is towards claiming more than exists.
What it does not say: that the claim is the right claim. An assertion compares a drawing against the arithmetic that produced it, and when a generator is handed an argument outside the range its picture means, both are wrong in the same way and they agree. A separate check covers that, and it still names families that would accept one.
Geometry
13 families
circle-angle
39 kinds of claim · 19 placements
- point 1 of the nine is the same distance from the centre ×9
- A lies on the circle
- a trisector and the far side are not parallel
- and its second and third
- and so do the other two
- and that distance is half the radius of the circle through the corners
- and the centroid sits twice as far from the orthocentre as from the circumcentre
- and the same construction on the other trisectors is not
- and the same on the other side
- B lies on the circle
- every apex on the arc gives the same angle
- every triangle in the sweep puts its nine points on one circle
- every trisector triangle in the sweep is equilateral
- one angle, not several
- opposite angles add to a straight angle
- the angle on a diameter is a right angle
- the apex is on the major arc
- the apex lies on the circle
- the centre's angle is twice the apex's
- the chord is a diameter
- the circumcentre, the centroid and the orthocentre lie on one line
- the exterior angle is twice the base angle
- the inner triangle's first two sides are equal
- the nine-point centre is the midpoint of that line
- the quadrilateral's angles add to 360°
- the shape sweep is between 6 and 60 steps on a side
- the splitters at A and B are not parallel
- the splitters at B and C are not parallel
- the splitters at C and A are not parallel
- the sweep covers a decent share of the shape space
- the sweep found enough non-degenerate triangles to mean something
- the sweep runs over between 20 and 2000 triangles
- the three angles are the angles of a triangle
- the three angles are those of a triangle and none is a sliver
- the triangle has three corners and some area
- the two halves are the whole angle
- the view is one the family draws
- triangle OPA is isosceles
- triangle OPB is isosceles
conic
48 kinds of claim · 28 placements
- the two curves cross at a right angle at (0.450, 0.583) ×24
- the ellipse with semi-axis 1.35 has the same foci ×7
- the hyperbola with semi-axis 0.4 has the same foci ×6
- every point of the 0.55 curve keeps the ratio ×3
- a circle needs a cut that produces one
- a ellipse needs a cut that produces one
- a hyperbola needs a cut that produces one
- a parabola needs a cut that produces one
- and each point is as far from the focus as from the directrix
- and on the hyperbola
- and reaches it going forwards, not backwards
- and the two distances differ by the same amount wherever it strikes
- and the two legs together are the same length wherever it bounces
- and travels towards it rather than away from it
- between 3 and 60 rays are traced
- between one and four curves
- each curve is a name and six finite coefficients
- each ratio is between nothing and 2.4
- every ellipse's semi-axis is longer than the focal distance
- every hyperbola's semi-axis is shorter than the focal distance
- every pair of curves was checked at its crossing
- every parallel ray reflects to the focus
- the crossing lies on the ellipse
- the curve named a hyperbola really is one
- the curve named a parabola really is one
- the curve named an ellipse really is one
- the cutting plane is tipped by less than a quarter turn
- the discriminant and the count of crossings with a large circle agree that a hyperbola is a hyperbola
- the discriminant and the count of crossings with a large circle agree that a parabola is a parabola
- the discriminant and the count of crossings with a large circle agree that an ellipse is an ellipse
- the ellipse has a longer axis and a shorter one
- the foci are between 0.2 and 3 from the centre
- the hyperbola has both semi-axes positive
- the incoming ray has a length to normalise
- the mirror is an ellipse, a parabola or a hyperbola
- the normal to the curve has a length to normalise
- the outgoing ray has a length to normalise
- the point is on the upper half of the curve
- the radius to the first focus has a length to normalise
- the radius to the second has a length to normalise
- the ratio is between nothing and 2.4
- the reflected ray lies on the line through the near focus
- the reflected ray passes through the other focus
- the tangent direction has a length to normalise
- the tangent makes the same angle with both focal radii
- the three values give three different kinds of curve
- the view is one the family draws
- the window is between 1 and 8 wide
euclid
4 kinds of claim · 11 placements
- the smallest square has side gcd(34, 13) ×4
- the squares tile the 34 by 13 rectangle ×4
- the leftover strip is still there after every pass
- the squares peeled at each pass are the continued fraction of the ratio
figurate
2 kinds of claim · 8 placements
- the first 6 odd numbers sum to 6² ×4
- the L-shaped shells fill the square
golden
9 kinds of claim · 5 placements
- one square per Fibonacci number
- the convergents alternate about φ
- the last convergent is close to φ
- the long side is the next Fibonacci number
- the number of convergents plotted is between 2 and 20
- the number of whirling squares is between 1 and 12
- the rectangle is nearly golden
- the short side is the one before it
- the whirling squares tile their rectangle
inversion
75 kinds of claim · 30 placements
- the circles round vertex 0 subtend exactly a full turn at it ×7
- ring 1: and the circle it surrounds from outside ×2
- ring 1: and touches the containing circle from inside ×2
- ring 1: each circle touches the next ×2
- a circle missing the centre inverts to a circle
- a circle orthogonal to the mirror is carried to itself
- a circle through the centre inverts to a line
- a point inside goes outside and a point outside comes in
- a point on the mirror circle is left exactly where it is
- and a line missing the centre inverts to a circle
- and a point of the circle lands on it
- and conjugates the imaginary part
- and every edge of the triangulation is a tangency of two circles
- and every point of the straight line lands on its circle
- and its curvature is a whole number
- and one for each of the eight ways of choosing inside or outside
- and so do their images, because a circle's image is a circle
- and the two short gaps overshoot
- and touches each of them on the page
- between two and four points are inverted, none of them at the centre
- both images are circles here
- centre and all
- circles whose vertices are not joined do not overlap
- each drawn circle really touches each given one
- each image gap is the original gap divided by the two distances from the centre
- each new circle satisfies Descartes's relation with its three parents
- every curvature in the packing is a whole number
- every pair of the seed circles touches
- every point of the circle lands on its image
- every point of the circle through the centre lands on its image
- every walk round an interior vertex closes on the circles already placed
- four points on one circle have a real cross-ratio
- four points, in order round the circle and none of them nearly coincident
- in both parts
- neither boundary passes through the inversion centre
- no chain circle passes through the inversion centre
- no point being inverted sits at a mirror's centre
- no point being inverted sits at the centre
- off the circle the identity becomes a strict inequality
- off the circle the three images are not collinear
- on a circle the products satisfy Ptolemy's identity exactly
- one inversion leaves the real part of the cross-ratio alone
- so the two short image gaps add to the long one
- the angle between the two curves is the same after the map as before
- the chord's end sits on the mirror
- the circle's image is a circle
- the concentric ring closes exactly when the radius ratio is the sine
- the constructed point is the one inside the mirror
- the drawn ring is genuinely lopsided rather than a disguised concentric one
- the first mirror has a sensible radius
- the four points are not concyclic, so their cross-ratio has a real imaginary part to conjugate
- the fourth point is pushed off the circle by less than half a radius
- the gasket is drawn to between one and six generations
- the image of the centre is not the centre of the image
- the image of the crossing point is on both image circles
- the inner circle has a sensible radius
- the inversion centre is inside the inner circle and off its centre
- the line inverted does not pass through the centre
- the mirror circle has a sensible radius
- the ring has between three and twelve circles
- the ring round the centre closes up
- the second mirror is offset by a sensible amount
- the seed satisfies Descartes's relation
- the tangent construction lands on the same point the formula gives
- the three centres are not collinear
- the three given circles lie outside one another
- the three images fall on one straight line
- the two circles really cross
- the two distances from the centre multiply to the square of the radius
- the view is one the family draws
- three boundary radii, repeated round the outside
- three circles in general position admit exactly eight tangent circles
- three given circles, each with a sensible radius
- two inversions put the cross-ratio back exactly
- which passes through the centre of the mirror
iso
25 kinds of claim · 5 placements
- the 3-gon encloses less than a circle of the same perimeter ×7
- the 3-gon is drawn at the same perimeter as the rest ×7
- regular 3-gon does not beat the circle ×5
- 2:1 rectangle does not beat the circle
- an L does not beat the circle
- and is still short of the circle's
- and it is the circle
- and its area is a quarter of the perimeter, squared
- and the area is strictly larger
- and the circle's quotient is exactly one
- even the best rectangle falls short of the circle
- every extra side encloses strictly more
- exactly one shape in the list reaches one, and it is the circle
- reflecting the dent leaves the perimeter exactly as it was
- Reuleaux triangle does not beat the circle
- so the quotient rises
- the circle does not beat the circle
- the circle of that perimeter encloses more than any of the polygons drawn
- the dent is between nothing and 160 units deep
- the largest rectangle in the sweep is the square
- the polygons drawn have between 3 and 60 sides
- the shared perimeter is between 60 and 900 units
- the sweep takes between 20 and 2000 samples
- the view is one the family draws
- whose two sides are equal
ordinary
14 kinds of claim · 6 placements
- a line with three points on it yields a strictly smaller distance
- each pair of points lies on one connecting line only
- no configuration searched avoids ordinary lines altogether
- some connecting line holds exactly two of the points
- some point is off some connecting line
- some set of this size is not all in one line
- the closest point-and-line pair uses a line with exactly two points
- the connecting lines between them account for every pair of points
- the distance the argument produces is strictly the smaller one
- the grid searched is three or four points across
- the point set is one this family knows
- the points are drawn between 12 and 60 units apart
- the search runs to between four and seven points
- the view is one the family draws
polyhedron
81 kinds of claim · 43 placements
- the order-4 axes carry 9 turns between them ×7
- a turn of order 3 sits on an axis of order 3 ×5
- and each such axis carries a turn of order 4 ×4
- 3 triangles at a vertex leave a gap ×3
- 5-cell: and the edge count agrees with that degree ×3
- 5-cell: every vertex is the same distance from the centre ×3
- 5-cell: every vertex meets the same number of edges ×3
- 3 hexagons at a vertex cannot leave a gap
- 3 pentagons at a vertex leave a gap
- 3 squares at a vertex leave a gap
- 4 pentagons at a vertex cannot leave a gap
- 4 squares at a vertex cannot leave a gap
- 6 triangles at a vertex cannot leave a gap
- a star polygon has between 5 and 13 points
- and 32 − 90 + 60 = 2, the Euler number of any sphere
- and at the depth found every edge is the same length
- and every one of them is the same triangle
- and sends every corner to a corner
- and steps by at least 2, less than half of p
- and steps by between 2 and 6
- and the angle at each point is π − 2πq/p
- as a surface it has thirty-two corners
- cuboctahedron: and lies on a circle, so it is regular
- cuboctahedron: and the walk round a corner visits every face at it once
- cuboctahedron: each face has equal sides
- cuboctahedron: Euler's formula still holds
- cuboctahedron: every edge is the same length
- cuboctahedron: every vertex is surrounded by the same faces in the same order
- each candidate is a turn rather than a reflection
- each polytope is one this family builds: 5-cell, tesseract, 16-cell, 24-cell
- each solid is one this family cuts: truncated-tetrahedron, truncated-cube, truncated-octahedron, cuboctahedron, icosidodecahedron, truncated-icosahedron
- every turn has an axis to be about
- exactly five vertex figures close up
- icosidodecahedron: and lies on a circle, so it is regular
- icosidodecahedron: and the walk round a corner visits every face at it once
- icosidodecahedron: each face has equal sides
- icosidodecahedron: Euler's formula still holds
- icosidodecahedron: every edge is the same length
- icosidodecahedron: every vertex is surrounded by the same faces in the same order
- no neighbour lies straight along the corner's own axis
- read as twelve pentagrams meeting five at a point, the number is −6
- tesseract: and the edge count agrees with that degree
- tesseract: every vertex is the same distance from the centre
- tesseract: every vertex meets the same number of edges
- the axes account for every turn, the one that does nothing included
- the corner polygon's edge starts shorter than the remaining edge and ends longer
- the faces at a corner close into a ring
- the number of distinct turns is twice the number of edges
- the path visits every point exactly once
- the path winds about the centre q times
- the projected solid has a measurable extent
- the solid is one of the five
- the spiky surface is sixty triangles
- the star has between 5 and 13 points
- the step and the number of points share no factor, so the path closes once
- the turn in four dimensions is at most half a circle
- the view is one the family draws
- truncated-cube: and lies on a circle, so it is regular
- truncated-cube: and the walk round a corner visits every face at it once
- truncated-cube: each face has equal sides
- truncated-cube: Euler's formula still holds
- truncated-cube: every edge is the same length
- truncated-cube: every vertex is surrounded by the same faces in the same order
- truncated-icosahedron: and lies on a circle, so it is regular
- truncated-icosahedron: and the walk round a corner visits every face at it once
- truncated-icosahedron: each face has equal sides
- truncated-icosahedron: Euler's formula still holds
- truncated-icosahedron: every edge is the same length
- truncated-icosahedron: every vertex is surrounded by the same faces in the same order
- truncated-octahedron: and lies on a circle, so it is regular
- truncated-octahedron: and the walk round a corner visits every face at it once
- truncated-octahedron: each face has equal sides
- truncated-octahedron: Euler's formula still holds
- truncated-octahedron: every edge is the same length
- truncated-octahedron: every vertex is surrounded by the same faces in the same order
- truncated-tetrahedron: and lies on a circle, so it is regular
- truncated-tetrahedron: and the walk round a corner visits every face at it once
- truncated-tetrahedron: each face has equal sides
- truncated-tetrahedron: Euler's formula still holds
- truncated-tetrahedron: every edge is the same length
- truncated-tetrahedron: every vertex is surrounded by the same faces in the same order
pythagoras
70 kinds of claim · 46 placements
- a larger exponent gives a ball that contains the smaller one
- a marked third side is inside the range drawn
- a triple whose squares add gives a right angle
- a triple whose squares do not add gives an angle that is not right
- and below one it is not, which is why p < 1 gives no distance at all
- and every one the search found is in the tree
- and half the rectangle — same base, apex on the parallel through the altitude
- and has not appeared before in the tree
- and is primitive
- at nine dimensions the inner sphere reaches the cube's faces
- at ten it is outside them
- consecutive knots are one unit apart
- each fixed ball drawn behind is between 1 and 12
- each leg at the corner is a positive length
- each leg is between nothing and a quarter turn
- each leg of the triangle is a positive length
- each side is a positive length
- each side of the box is a positive length
- every node of the tree is a right triangle in whole numbers
- every point drawn is at distance one in this norm
- four triangles and the tilted square fill the left square
- four triangles and the two upright squares fill the right square
- so the square and the rectangle are equal
- the altitude cuts the big square into exactly these two rectangles
- the angle at C is a right angle
- the angle at the corner is a right angle
- the ball meets the diagonal at 2^(-1/p) in each coordinate
- the box has three positive sides
- the constructed triangle's hypotenuse is the root of the sum of the squares
- the corner is square exactly when the squares add
- the dimensions drawn run from 1 to between 4 and 40
- the drawn third side is c
- the eight triangles are all the same
- the exponent is between 0.4 and 12 — below 1 it is drawn as a warning
- the exponent of the norm is between 0.4 and 12
- the first right face is half the product of its legs
- the fixed balls behind it are between 1 and 12
- the floor diagonal meets the vertical edge at a right angle
- the given triangle and the constructed right triangle are congruent
- the hyperbolic excess in c² is a²b²/3 at small size
- the inner circle touches each corner circle
- the largest triangle drawn has legs under a quarter turn
- the legs are positive lengths
- the long leg is b
- the proof is one the family draws
- the rope carries one knot per unit of its length
- the rope's three sides are whole numbers of knots, each under sixty
- the second right triangle has the floor diagonal and the height as its legs
- the sensitivity at the right angle is c/ab radians per unit
- the short leg is a
- the slanted face's area squared is the sum of the three right faces' areas squared
- the space diagonal squared is the sum of the three squares
- the sphere shortens the hypotenuse and the hyperbolic plane lengthens it
- the spherical hypotenuse is shorter than the flat one
- the spherical hypotenuse satisfies cos c = cos a cos b
- the spherical shortfall in c² is a²b²/3 at small size
- the square on the hypotenuse is c²
- the square on the leg has the leg's area squared
- the three faces at the corner meet at right angles
- the three lengths close into a triangle
- the tilted square equals the two upright squares
- the tilted square is c²
- the tree finds exactly as many primitive triples under 200 as the search does
- the tree is checked against a search up to a hypotenuse between 50 and 2000
- the tree is drawn to between 1 and 3 generations
- the tree of triples is drawn to between 1 and 3 generations
- the triangle is half the square — same base, apex on the opposite side
- the two floor edges meet at a right angle
- the two triangles are the same triangle turned
- with p at least one, the midpoint of any two points of the ball is inside it
reuleaux
51 kinds of claim · 25 placements
- the 3-sided curve is built at the common width ×4
- the 3-sided Reuleaux curve has one width at every angle ×4
- the integral of h round a 3-sided curve is π times the width ×3
- a Reuleaux polygon needs an odd number of sides
- all the shapes have one width
- and is convex
- and it holds for the solid of revolution, measured
- and it is the same in every direction
- and its radius of curvature stays positive, so it is convex
- and lands between the ball and the conjectured minimum
- and the circle's is a quarter of π times it
- and the drawn boundary really is that long
- and the drawn points confirm it, direction by direction
- and the largest is the edge times (√6 − 1)/√2, across two opposite curved edges
- and the Reuleaux triangle the least
- and the smooth family gets only part of the way to the triangle
- and the support function itself is not flat, so the flat sum says something
- and the sweep runs past the point where convexity fails
- and they do so in every direction, not only the one drawn
- at the width the function was given
- between one and four smooth amplitudes, each at most twelve
- between thirty and a hundred and sixty samples per angle
- between twenty and two hundred samples
- between two and five odd side counts, each at most eleven
- Blaschke's relation holds for the ball, which is the check that it is stated right
- convexity fails exactly where h + h″ first vanishes
- every arc bulges away from the centre
- every harmonic in the support function is odd
- every shape in the table has the same width
- ground and plank stay one width apart
- so the solid is not of constant width
- the area falls the whole way, so the minimum is on the constraint boundary
- the boundary is sampled between five hundred and twenty thousand times
- the built curve has constant width
- the circle encloses the most
- the circle is convex
- the four corners are equally spaced
- the generating curve has the stated width
- the harmonic is odd, between three and seven
- the least is about nine tenths of the most
- the plotted sum is flat at the width
- the smallest width is the edge itself
- the smooth curve has the common width
- the spun triangle encloses less than the ball
- the triangle's area is (π − √3)/2 times the square of the width
- the two support distances in opposite directions add to the width
- the view is one the family draws
- the width does not depend on how far it has rolled
- the width is positive
- the width is the arc radius
- though it misses by only a few per cent
unroll
2 kinds of claim · 7 placements
- the rings account for the whole disc
- the triangle of base 2πr and height r has the disc's area
voronoi
50 kinds of claim · 32 placements
- the centre of cell 0 is nearest to site 0 ×20
- a planar triangulation of n points has at most 3n − 6 edges
- a point is under the chord exactly when it is inside the interval
- a site has a cell exactly when its lifted point is a corner of the lower hull
- a site inside the circle is nearer to both ends than the ends are to each other
- a spanning tree has one edge fewer than it has sites
- and at least enough to be connected
- and so the refuted edge is not in the shortest tree after all
- at least one pair of circles actually crosses
- at least one site has no cell, which is what the picture is about
- between 2 and 60 sites, each a point in or near the unit square
- by the largest count drawn, the pairs outnumber the triangulation's edges several times over
- each graph in the chain has no more edges than the next
- each panel is on the side of the threshold the figure claims
- every Delaunay triangle spans a face of the lower hull
- every edge of the minimum spanning tree is an edge of the triangulation
- every Gabriel edge is a Delaunay edge
- every Lloyd step lowers the total squared distance to the nearest site
- every lower face projects to a Delaunay triangle
- every nearest neighbour edge is a shortest tree edge
- every relative neighbourhood edge is a Gabriel edge
- every shortest tree edge is a relative neighbourhood edge
- every site keeps a cell
- every upper face's circumcircle contains every other site
- exactly one of the two triangulations is the Delaunay one
- more than half of the whole fall happens in the first two rounds
- most interior cells settle at six sides, by more than double the next count
- no point beats the centroid
- no triangle's circumcircle holds another site
- the bisector is where the two distances tie
- the cells account for the whole box, with nothing double-covered
- the cells still account for the whole box
- the chain is not a chain of equalities
- the circle on a tree edge as diameter holds no other site
- the circumcircle verdict and the lifted-hull verdict agree
- the cost falls at every round
- the edge chosen to be refuted really does have a site inside its circle
- the farthest-point triangulation uses only sites on the convex hull
- the gap between chord and parabola is −(x − a)(x − b)
- the highlighted cell is one of the sites
- the iteration has actually moved, rather than starting at its own fixed point
- the lift finds as many triangles as the circumcircle test does
- the middle cell is absent at the small weight and present at the large one
- the middle of each cell has that cell's site nearest in the power distance
- the moment about the site is the moment about the centroid plus area times the gap squared
- the settled cells are far closer to equal in area than the scatter's
- the settled diagram holds a larger share of six-sided interior cells
- the tested point is inside the interval, which is what makes the pair illegal
- the triangulation is not empty
- where two circles cross, the two power distances agree
Analysis
9 families
circle-to-sine
3 kinds of claim · 8 placements
- the point is on the circle
- the point's height is the wave's height there
- the two coordinates are a point of the unit circle
converge
17 kinds of claim · 7 placements
- a member fits inside the tube exactly when the convergence is uniform
- between two and six member numbers, each a whole number up to 400
- each column of the picture settles on the limit
- no point of the interval beats the stated largest gap
- one to three sequences this family draws
- refining the grid finds a larger gap, because the largest is reached nowhere
- the grid finds the largest gap, because it is reached at a point
- the largest gap for x / n falls with n
- the largest gap for xⁿ does not fall with n
- the largest gap for xⁿ never drops below where it started
- the largest gap shrinks exactly when the convergence is uniform
- the members are given in increasing order
- the search for a member inside the tube runs to between 20 and 2000
- the sequence is one this family draws
- the sup distance is plotted for between 6 and 80 values of n
- the tube has a half-width between 0.02 and 0.6
- the view is one the family draws
convex
66 kinds of claim · 37 placements
- A has three to eight corners
- A's corners are all on its own hull, so the set is convex
- and a function that is not convex fails the same test, so the test has content
- and all but a handful of borderline cases are one or the other
- and every corner of the second strictly on the other
- and never more than three
- and positive against the target, which is the refutation
- and the other has more than one
- and the second is outside it
- and with every three assumed, the whole family has a common point
- B has three to eight corners
- B's corners are all on its own hull, so the set is convex
- between ninety and thirty-six hundred directions swept
- between one and six targets
- between six and twenty points in the scatter
- between twenty and four thousand random quadruples
- between two and eight values are averaged
- between two and seven points are averaged
- between two and six touch points, all inside the interval
- both ends of the chord are inside the interval drawn
- every corner of the first set is strictly on one side
- every point is inside the interval drawn
- every point of the hull lies in the hull of three of the points
- every three of the family have a common point
- every two of the family have a common point
- every value is positive and inside the interval drawn
- no line in any of the 720 directions separates the two sets
- no vector is both a non-negative combination and refuted by a direction
- one positive weight per point
- so a refuting direction exists for the second
- some chord of this function dips below it
- the average of the values is at least the value at the average
- the average of the values is at most the value at the average
- the chord runs left to right
- the chord stays above the curve at every sampled point
- the chord stays below the curve at every sampled point
- the conjugate of x² is p²/4, found by search
- the convex function has exactly one local minimum on the interval
- the crescent's hull swallows its own mouth, so the crescent is not convex
- the curve stays above the tangent everywhere, not only nearby
- the direction is non-positive against every generator
- the first target is inside the cone
- the function drawn is a convex one
- the function is one this family draws
- the gap the line leaves is exactly the distance between the sets
- the geometric mean is at most the arithmetic mean
- the great majority of quadruples were non-degenerate
- the mean of the logarithms is at most the logarithm of the mean
- the mean of the logarithms names the geometric mean
- the scatter has a two-dimensional hull
- the search examined some pair of ends
- the search runs over between 20 and 200 candidate ends
- the small set lies outside the crescent
- the transform is drawn for a convex function
- the two generators are independent
- the two means agree exactly when every value is the same
- the two parts' hulls share the point the dependence produces
- the two sets are disjoint
- the view is one the family draws
- the weakened hypothesis is on or off
- the weights add to one
- transforming twice returns the original function
- two functions, side by side
- two generating vectors
- while the sweep does find a wall when one exists, so it is not simply blind
- with only the pairs assumed, the whole family can have nothing in common
exponential
33 kinds of claim · 26 placements
- so over 0.7702 exactly the factor is 2 ×4
- a base that is not e does not have slope equal to height
- and at base e the slope is the height
- and is what the closed form gives over that interval
- and the gap left is smaller than the last term added
- and the limit of the staircase is e itself
- and the place where that area is exactly 1 is e
- and the ratio falls towards 1 every step
- both factors are above 1 and their product fits
- both intervals lie inside the integrated range
- each solution starts at a positive height of at most 4
- every partial sum is below e
- more splits is closer to e
- no number of splits reaches e
- so by the end it is under one per cent
- so the two areas add to the area of the product
- the approximation is always an underestimate here
- the area is taken from 1 up to somewhere between 1 and 12
- the area under 1/x from 1 is the logarithm
- the base is a positive number of at most 20
- the curve integrated from the equation is the exponential
- the factor is the same wherever along the curve the interval starts
- the gap closes like one twelfth of 1/n, measured at the last row
- the growth rate is between a twentieth and three in size
- the interval over which the height changes by that factor is inside the window drawn
- the region from a to ab has the same area as the region from 1 to b
- the region runs from 1 to somewhere between 1 and 12
- the table runs to between 4 and 20
- the table shown gets e right to three decimals
- the tangent drawn is the curve's own slope
- the two factors are both above 1 and their product is at most 12
- the view is one the family draws
- the year is split between 2 and 6 ways, each a whole number up to a million
fourier
38 kinds of claim · 32 placements
- the 0-th line of the period-2 train sits on the envelope ×94
- harmonic 1 has decayed by exp(−1²t) at t = 0.005 ×18
- sine 1 against sine 2 integrates to nothing ×12
- the 1-term curve is sampled fast enough to be the function rather than an alias ×5
- sine 1 against sine 1 integrates to π ×4
- the lines of the period-2 train are 1/T apart ×4
- the projection onto sine 1 is the harmonic this family draws ×3
- the projection onto sine 2 cancels to nothing ×2
- a longer period puts the lines closer together
- and its finest oscillation is more than three pixels wide
- and the slopes grow faster than the amplitudes shrink, which is the whole condition
- and the terms it leaves out are below a twentieth of what the window shows
- between 5 and 121 harmonics carry the profile
- between 5 and 61 harmonics
- between two and four harmonics, each between 1 and 12
- between two and four periods, each positive
- between two and six times, none of them negative
- by the last frame the profile is a single sine to within two percent
- each window is between a hundred-thousandth and two wide
- each window is drawn from between 200 and 4000 samples
- each window is sampled fast enough for the terms it draws
- every term count is a whole number between 1 and 200
- magnifying ten times does not flatten the curve ten times
- more terms is closer, away from the jump
- the amplitudes shrink
- the coefficients of the sawtooth wave fall like 1/m^1
- the coefficients of the square wave fall like 1/m^1
- the coefficients of the triangle wave fall like 1/m^2
- the construction is the one with no tangents
- the curve drawn is the sum of the harmonics
- the deepest zoom still has something to look at
- the fine detail fades faster than the coarse shape
- the frequencies multiply by an odd whole number
- the pulse fits inside every period drawn
- the spectrum has something in it
- the steepest chord gets steeper as the spacing shrinks
- the view is one the family draws
- the wave is one the family draws
harmonic
68 kinds of claim · 51 placements
- piece 1 is 0.50 of what was left ×13
- the first 1 terms add to the closed form ×12
- stage 0 has two to the 0 intervals ×8
- and their lengths add to (2/3) to the 0 ×7
- block 1 reaches a half ×4
- and between them they are all 32 strings of 5 bits
- and by the last drawn stage it is already tiny
- and by this stage they already cover most of the interval
- and ends at one
- and it is still coming down towards the limit
- and lists none of them twice
- and no address uses the digit one
- and points of different classes are different points
- and the remainder is the ratio to the power of the number of pieces
- and they add to what the series says
- and what has gone is the geometric series it looks like
- and what is left is exactly the tail
- between 12 and 40 rationals are covered
- between 3 and 7 ternary digits are listed
- between 3 and 9 stages are drawn
- between three and nine translates are drawn
- between three and ten stages are built
- between two and six classes are drawn
- consecutive partial sums differ by the next term
- each address names the left end of its own interval
- each block leans further out than the one below it
- each class is sampled at between 6 and 30 points
- each rational is inside its own interval
- every partial sum falls short of the limit
- it starts at nought
- no candidate length puts the union between one and three
- no point is in two classes at once
- no term is used twice
- no two addresses read the same in binary
- no two seeds is a small rational away from another, which would be a typo
- so the translates of the selection do not overlap
- the answer is caught between an even and an odd partial sum
- the bound on each block is exactly a half
- the covered rationals leave no wide gap, so the covering meets every part of the line
- the covering budget is between a hundredth and a half
- the drawn lean is the sum of the drawn steps
- the drawn running total is the partial sum
- the error is smaller than the last term used
- the first middle removed is between a third and an eighth
- the function is constant across each removed interval
- the function never decreases
- the gap to ln n has settled on γ
- the last term is small
- the length left is the product of what each stage keeps
- the lengths add to less than the budget
- the list holds the rationals it was asked for
- the longest surviving interval shrinks at every stage
- the middle-thirds set of the same depth has far less left
- the pieces and what is left fill the square exactly
- the plotted partial sums are the series
- the ratio is strictly between nothing and one
- the rearranged total settles near the number it was aimed at
- the removed intervals so far have the length the construction gives
- the signs are the ones the series has
- the smallest interval is still wide enough to be represented
- the surviving length is bounded away from nothing
- the target is visibly away from the sum the same terms give in order
- the total is not small
- the union is no longer than the sum of the pieces
- the view is one the family draws
- there is one address for each surviving interval
- two different translates never carry the same point of a class twice
- what is left and what has gone add to the whole interval
riemann
37 kinds of claim · 29 placements
- at 1 steps the length is still 2 ×7
- the staircase of 2 steps is exactly 2 long ×3
- and by this stage it is already small
- and is nearly nothing by the end
- and its length is nowhere near the curve's
- and the fat one keeps a length in the limit
- each panel is at least as close as the one before it
- each staircase runs closer to the curve than the last
- middle quarter, halving: no cell lies wholly inside the set, so the lower sum is nought
- middle quarter, halving: refining the partition never raises the upper sum
- middle quarter, halving: the upper sum never falls below the set's own length
- middle thirds: no cell lies wholly inside the set, so the lower sum is nought
- middle thirds: refining the partition never raises the upper sum
- middle thirds: the upper sum never falls below the set's own length
- more bars means less error
- no width, no area
- so in the limit the middle-thirds set has no length at all
- so the first upper sum is on its way down to nothing
- the accumulation only ever climbs, because f is positive
- the area between the two shrinks every time the steps are halved
- the drawn partition has between 24 and 240 cells
- the fat construction's first middle is between a third and an eighth
- the finest one is within a twentieth of the curve everywhere
- the function is one the figure knows
- the middle-thirds approximation's length is two-thirds to the power of the stage
- the panels really are in increasing order of rectangles
- the printed total is the area of the bars drawn
- the quoted exact area is the area under this curve
- the set is approximated at between 5 and 14 stages
- the slope of the accumulated area is the height of the curve
- the staircase is built against quarter or diagonal
- the staircase of 1 step is exactly 2 long
- the step counts are between 2 and 5 whole numbers up to 512
- the sweep runs over between three and eight partition sizes
- the sweep runs up to between 4 and 512 steps
- the view is one the family draws
- while the second has already settled on the set's own length
secant
37 kinds of claim · 23 placements
- and the difference quotient closes on u'v + uv'
- and the gap as a fraction of the window falls with it
- and the rough curve's do not settle on anything
- between 1 and 4 mirrored pairs are marked
- between 1 and 4 pairs are marked
- between 2 and 4 windows are drawn
- between 4 and 14 spacings are measured
- both sides grow, so the picture is four pieces and not a signed sum
- both sides of the rectangle are positive lengths
- by the last halving the corner is under a twentieth of the increment
- each magnification is between 2 and 20
- each secant is closer than the last
- each step magnifies by between 2 and 20
- every secant from the left has slope −1
- every secant from the right has slope 1
- the bisection really inverts the function
- the corner's share of the increment falls at every halving
- the curve is one the figure knows
- the first window is at most 4 wide
- the four pieces fill the grown rectangle
- the function increases across the window it is drawn in
- the function is increasing where it is marked, so it has an inverse there
- the function is one the family knows
- the function is one the figure knows
- the gap to the tangent falls by the square of the magnification
- the increment is the two strips and the corner
- the last secant is near the tangent
- the marked point is inside the window
- the pair is one the figure knows
- the rectangle is drawn inside the domain of both functions
- the secants are drawn at a list of 2 to 24 positive offsets
- the smooth curve's chords close on its tangent
- the step is a positive length under 1.6
- the step the rectangle grows by is a positive length under 1.6
- the two sides disagree, so there is no limit
- the two slopes at a matched pair multiply to one
- the view is one the family draws
taylor
48 kinds of claim · 26 placements
- the polynomial passes through node 1 ×21
- the degree-1 sum matches to order 1 at the expansion point ×7
- the degree-2 sum about 1.2 matches the function to order 2 there ×6
- as x shrinks, the point settles at 1/(n+2) for degree 1 ×4
- the degree-2 sum about -1.4 matches the function to order 2 there ×3
- between 3 and 41 nodes ×2
- a degree between 1 and 20
- an amplification factor is never below one, since the nodes reproduce themselves
- and by the largest count drawn it is orders of magnitude worse
- and it dwarfs anything in the middle of the interval
- between one and five degrees, each between 1 and 8
- between one and four degrees
- between one and four singularities, each a point of the plane
- between one and six centres
- between three and fourteen node counts, each between 3 and 25
- Chebyshev nodes keep the error small across the whole interval
- each new centre lies inside the previous disc, so its coefficients are known there
- each node is the projection of its angle
- equally spaced nodes never amplify less than Chebyshev ones
- every term count is a whole number between 1 and 40
- inside the new interval more terms help
- inside the radius, more terms help
- ln(1+x) is centred where it is defined
- ln(1+x) is expanded inside its own radius
- no centre sits on a singularity
- no singularity lies strictly inside a disc
- outside it they hurt
- outside it, more terms hurt
- the bound is a bound
- the centre is inside the drawn domain
- the Chebyshev end gaps are several times smaller than the middle one
- the equally spaced constant grows with every step
- the error never exceeds the bound Lagrange's form puts on it
- the evenly spaced nodes have one gap throughout
- the function is one the figure knows
- the function is one whose derivatives the figure knows
- the interval drawn is inside the function's radius
- the interval drawn is not empty
- the interval is between 0.4 and 8 wide
- the mode draws the functions whose derivative is monotone
- the mode of the taylor family is one of sums, radius, remainder, xi, centre, discs, interp, lebesgue, nodes
- the nodes are equally spaced or Chebyshev
- the point moves steadily in one direction as x grows
- the radius is the distance to the nearest singularity
- the smallest gap is at one of the ends
- the tail of the series is the difference between the function and its partial sum
- the unknown point lies strictly between nought and x
- with equally spaced nodes the worst error is out near the ends
Algebra
8 families
algebra-tiles
14 kinds of claim · 9 placements
- and the reassembled rectangle has the same area
- the four tiles are the square
- the larger length is larger
- the length really solves the equation
- the missing corner is (b/2)²
- the negative root solves it too
- the picture is about positive lengths
- the positive root is the one a length can be
- the square tile is x²
- the strips are bx however they are cut
- the three pieces and the corner make a square of side x + b/2
- the two pieces are what is left of a² after b² is removed
- which is completing the square, as arithmetic
- which is the identity
complex-turn
52 kinds of claim · 27 placements
- the root at step 0 first returns to 1 after 1 multiplications ×26
- root 0 raised to the 5 is 1 ×24
- the coefficient of x^0 in the product is the one in xⁿ − 1 ×16
- and that number is the Möbius function of 1 ×12
- the primitive roots of order 1 add to a real number ×12
- the factor belonging to the roots of order 1 has degree φ(1) ×8
- the curve the image of the circle of radius 0.4 never passes exactly through the origin ×7
- the image of radius 0.4 turns once for each root inside it ×7
- the image of the circle of radius 0.4 closes up after a whole number of turns ×7
- the walk along the image of the circle of radius 0.4 is fine enough to see which way it turned ×7
- the circle of radius 0.4 has 0 roots inside and turns 0 times ×4
- the curve the image of radius 0.4 never passes exactly through the origin ×4
- the image of radius 0.4 closes up after a whole number of turns ×4
- the walk along the image of radius 0.4 is fine enough to see which way it turned ×4
- far out, the image turns once for each power of z, which is 3 times ×2
- a polynomial of degree 3 has 3 roots
- all 12 roots add to zero
- and close in it does not go round the origin at all
- and has no imaginary part left
- and it crosses between them
- and multiply to the constant term, with a sign that follows the degree
- and the angles add
- and the degrees of the factors add to n, because every root has exactly one order
- and their imaginary parts cancel
- at a place where the discriminant is passing through zero
- each root found really is a root
- each step of the division gives a whole number
- every root found really is a root
- every root is on the unit circle
- in both coordinates
- the division leaves no remainder
- the equation is zⁿ = 1 for n between 4 and 20
- the factors multiply out to a polynomial of the right degree
- the lengths multiply
- the number of powers drawn is between 2 and 24
- the number of powers taken is between 1 and 24
- the number of roots of unity is between 2 and 24
- the polygon drawn has between 3 and 16 corners
- the polynomial has a degree
- the polynomial has a degree between 1 and 6
- the radii drawn are between 2 and 5 positive numbers no larger than 4
- the roots add to minus the next coefficient over the leading one
- the roots sum to zero
- the sign of the discriminant says how many roots are real
- the sums take all three of the values that function takes
- the sweep meets both cases
- the sweep takes between 20 and 800 samples
- the swept family is a depressed cubic with a negative linear term
- the table of sums runs to between 6 and 16
- the table runs to between 6 and 16
- the view is one the family draws
- with nothing imaginary left over
eliminate
16 kinds of claim · 5 placements
- a shared root is found exactly when the determinant says there is one
- all 2 roots of the eliminated polynomial are accounted for
- both polynomials have a degree of at least one
- each step of the division lowers the degree
- every root of the eliminated polynomial is the abscissa of a real crossing
- every zero of the swept determinant is a parameter at which a root is shared
- the determinant equals the second polynomial evaluated at every root of the first
- the determinant vanishes exactly when the two share a factor
- the eliminated polynomial is the resultant at every sampled x
- the fixed polynomial is an integer quadratic
- the pair of curves is one this family knows
- the resultant of a polynomial and its slope vanishes exactly at a repeated root
- the sweep runs upward over a range of 1 to 20
- the view is one the family draws
- two pairs of integer polynomials, each of degree 1 to 3
- two to four integer cubics
group
120 kinds of claim · 36 placements
- a subgroup of 1 divides the group of 8 ×8
- S3 has the number of elements it should ×3
- the elements reachable in 1 steps are exactly those at distance 1 or less ×3
- e leaves 16 colourings alone, one per cycle coloured freely ×2
- exactly 8 of the 24 relabellings preserve every distance ×2
- m₁ leaves 8 colourings alone, one per cycle coloured freely ×2
- m₂ leaves 4 colourings alone, one per cycle coloured freely ×2
- m₃ leaves 8 colourings alone, one per cycle coloured freely ×2
- m₄ leaves 4 colourings alone, one per cycle coloured freely ×2
- r leaves 2 colourings alone, one per cycle coloured freely ×2
- r² leaves 4 colourings alone, one per cycle coloured freely ×2
- r³ leaves 2 colourings alone, one per cycle coloured freely ×2
- the classes hold all 16 colourings between them and share none ×2
- a subgroup whose blocks differ has an element that shows it
- A5 has the number of elements it should
- and no element is in two of them
- and none of them is the identity, which would generate nothing
- and the second subgroup's are not — which is what makes it the control
- and the two maps are genuinely different graphs
- and the whole group is reached
- between one and four groups this family knows
- between one and four permutation groups this family knows
- between one and three generators are named
- both maps are of the same group
- column e does too
- column m₁ does too
- column m₂ does too
- column m₃ does too
- column m₄ does too
- column r does too
- column r² does too
- column r³ does too
- e preserves every distance between corners
- each step's size divides the last
- every block is the size of the subgroup
- every class has a size dividing the group's
- every composition of two motions is again one of the motions
- every element sits in exactly one shell
- every generator names an element of the group
- every named element is in the group
- m₁ preserves every distance between corners
- m₂ preserves every distance between corners
- m₃ preserves every distance between corners
- m₄ preserves every distance between corners
- m₅ preserves every distance between corners
- m₆ preserves every distance between corners
- multiplying on the left carries every edge to an edge
- no two of the motions do the same thing to the corners
- r preserves every distance between corners
- r² preserves every distance between corners
- r³ preserves every distance between corners
- r⁴ preserves every distance between corners
- r⁵ preserves every distance between corners
- row e contains every element exactly once
- row m₁ contains every element exactly once
- row m₂ contains every element exactly once
- row m₃ contains every element exactly once
- row m₄ contains every element exactly once
- row r contains every element exactly once
- row r² contains every element exactly once
- row r³ contains every element exactly once
- so the subgroup's size times the number of blocks is the group's size
- some group in the table does not reach the identity
- some pair of motions gives a different result in each order
- the average number left alone is the number of classes
- the block a product lands in does not depend on which elements were picked
- the blocks between them cover the group exactly once
- the classes are drawn for at most 64 colourings
- the commutators generate a subgroup of the group they came from
- the conjugacy classes account for every element exactly once
- the corners are coloured in between 2 and 4 colours
- the derived subgroup is carried into itself by every conjugation
- the elements are closed under composition
- the even symmetries of five letters have no normal subgroup in between
- the exhaustive search is drawn for at most 5 corners
- the first has as many blocks as its index
- the first subgroup is named by element labels
- the first subgroup's left and right blocks are the same blocks
- the generators are distinct
- the group is one this family knows
- the group is the dihedral one or the cyclic one
- the identity is a class of its own
- the m₁ and m₂ generate the whole group
- the named elements are closed under composition
- the permutation group is one this family knows
- the permutations are of between two and five letters
- the polygon has between 3 and 8 corners
- the r and m₁ generate the whole group
- the r generate the whole group
- the second is too
- the series never grows
- the subgroup is named by between one and eight element labels
- the trivial subgroup and the whole group are both among them
- the two subgroups nobody has to look for are among the ones found
- the view is one the family draws
- the word e lands on e
- the word m₁ lands on m₁
- the word m₁·m₂ lands on r³
- the word m₁·m₂·m₁ lands on m₄
- the word m₁·m₂·m₁·m₂ lands on r²
- the word m₁·r lands on m₄
- the word m₁·r lands on m₅
- the word m₁·r lands on m₆
- the word m₁·r·m₁ lands on r⁴
- the word m₁·r·m₁ lands on r⁵
- the word m₁·r·r lands on m₄
- the word m₁·r·r lands on m₅
- the word m₂ lands on m₂
- the word m₂·m₁ lands on r
- the word m₂·m₁·m₂ lands on m₃
- the word r lands on r
- the word r·m₁ lands on m₂
- the word r·r lands on r²
- the word r·r·m₁ lands on m₃
- the word r·r·r lands on r³
- the word r·r·r·m₁ lands on m₄
- the word r·r·r·r lands on r⁴
- the word r·r·r·r·r lands on r⁵
- they differ in something a reader can see — the number of steps across, or the number of arrows
- two generating sets are compared
linear-map
137 kinds of claim · 89 placements
- and the 5th power agrees with 5 multiplications ×2
- a map that keeps both dimensions has a non-zero determinant
- a map that loses a dimension has determinant zero
- a power of the matrix is between 2 and 24
- a real 2×2 map has two eigenvalues counted with sign
- a skew matrix exponentiates to a rotation, first entry
- a symmetric matrix's eigen-directions are perpendicular
- a touching pair and a free pair were both found
- adding a multiple of one column to another changes nothing
- an ellipse of area past four times the determinant does hold a non-zero point
- an odd number of grid lines between 3 and 9
- an odd number of grid lines between 3 and 9, so one runs through the point
- an unsymmetric one's are not, which is what the panel is for
- and agrees with the expansion along a row
- and at a root the shifted map crushes something to nothing
- and does not already point along the answer
- and each direction really is left alone
- and every pair running to the other finishes does cross
- and every point at all lands on one line
- and exponentiating the two eigenvalues gives the same matrix
- and it keeps area exactly
- and its size is the size of that number
- and its two eigen-directions are genuinely different
- and moves the permanent
- and multiply to the determinant
- and reaches it on the smallest patch drawn
- and so are their images
- and so does the triple product of the columns
- and the angle shrinks by the ratio of the two eigenvalues
- and the direction it occurs in is an eigen-direction, to within one sample
- and the identity leaves the unit square alone
- and the shortest is 1/√λ for the larger
- and the shortest is the second
- and there is a direction it sends to the origin
- and where it has got to is what that rate predicts
- AᵀA is symmetric and has two real eigenvalues
- Av is λv in the first coordinate
- Av is λv in the second
- both eigenvalues are positive, so the level set is a closed curve
- each matrix in a row is four finite entries under 8 in size
- each root really is a root
- every choice of struck row gives the same number
- every corner of the image stays inside its panel
- every pair was classified once
- every point drawn satisfies xᵀAx = 1
- every point of that line lands on the origin
- every start reaches every finish
- every step brings the arrow nearer the dominant direction
- every tree found has one edge fewer than it has vertices
- fourth
- in both coordinates
- one dimension survives and one is lost, and they add to the two started with
- one eigenvalue is strictly the largest
- P D P⁻¹ is the map it started from
- scaling one column scales the area by the same factor
- second
- so relative to the patch it falls by two
- so the determinant counts the pairs that never meet
- swapping two columns turns the sign over
- the area factor of e^A is e to the trace of A
- the area factor of the image closes on |det J| as the patch shrinks
- the area multiplier is zero
- the area of the drawn parallelogram is ad − bc
- the arrow it starts from is a pair of numbers with a length
- the arrow takes at least three steps before it arrives
- the basis is four finite entries no larger than four
- the basis spans an area rather than a line
- the camera angles are within a half turn
- the change of basis is invertible
- the column is scaled by between one and three
- the counting window is between 2 and 8 across
- the crossing pairs are matched exactly by the pairs running to the other finishes
- the curved map is one the family knows
- the determinant is the number of spanning trees, counted
- the determinant of the product is the product of the determinants
- the drawn area is the determinant
- the ellipse has two positive radii no larger than four
- the expansion along a row agrees with the sum over permutations
- the first matrix of a product is four finite entries under 8 in size
- the flow runs for a positive time of at most 4
- the flow runs for between 0 and 4 units of time
- the flow starts from between three and twelve points
- the flow's own arrival points are the columns of the series' answer
- the form has two real eigenvalues
- the form is positive in every direction
- the four terms of the expansion add to ad − bc
- the graph is one the family knows
- the image line has a length to normalise
- the image of the unit square has the determinant's area
- the iteration runs between 2 and 40 steps
- the lattice is drawn far enough out to fill the counting window
- the lattice is drawn out to between 3 and 12 steps
- the longest image measured on the ellipse is the first stretch
- the longest radius measured on the curve is 1/√λ for the smaller eigenvalue
- the map does not crush the arrow to nothing at any step
- the map does not flatten the circle to a segment
- the map has two real eigenvalues
- the map has two real eigenvalues to build a basis from
- the map is one the family knows
- the maps drawn have different ranks
- the matrix drawn here collapses the plane onto a line
- the matrix is four finite entries no larger than four
- the matrix is four finite entries under 8 in size and is not all zero
- the matrix is three rows of three finite entries no larger than four
- the matrix is three rows of three whole numbers under ten
- the measured Jacobian is the analytic one
- the multiple is a non-zero whole number no larger than four
- the patch is at most 1.2 across
- the paths counted by hand agree with the binomial
- the permanent of the pattern counts the ways to pick one entry per row and column
- the point is a pair of coordinates
- the points in a window are its area over the determinant, up to the boundary
- the residual falls by four at every halving of the patch
- the roots add to the trace
- the row operation adds one row to a different one
- the row operation leaves the determinant exactly where it was
- the second is too
- the series has converged
- the shifted determinant and λ² − (trace)λ + determinant agree
- the signed sum is the determinant
- the smallest ellipse holding a lattice point has area at most four times the determinant
- the starting arrow has a length
- the starting points are between three and twelve pairs of numbers
- the struck row is one of the vertices
- the three columns are not flat, or there is no solid to draw
- the two directions in the circle are perpendicular
- the two stretches are equal, so every direction is stretched alike
- the two stretches multiply to the area factor
- the unsigned sum is at least as large as the signed one
- the view is one the family draws
- the λ window is a positive width up to 20
- third
- two different roots give two independent directions
- two equal columns leave no area at all
- two finishing points, on a small grid
- two starting points, on a small grid
- what survives and what is lost add to two
projection
70 kinds of claim · 30 placements
- basis vectors 1 and 2 are perpendicular ×12
- the polynomials of degree 0 and 1 are exactly perpendicular ×10
- the polynomial of degree 0 is monic ×5
- basis vector 1 has length one ×4
- the degree-0 result is the Legendre polynomial scaled to be monic ×4
- vector 1 is rebuilt from its own row of the table ×4
- moving coefficient 0 by -0.25 makes the total worse ×3
- moving coefficient 0 by 0.25 makes the total worse ×3
- the 1th vector uses no direction built after it ×3
- the residual is perpendicular to the column of x^0 ×3
- vector 1 is two finite coordinates no larger than twelve ×2
- a non-zero vector has positive weighted length
- a rational is two whole numbers
- a squared length is never negative
- a·b is |a||b| cos θ
- a·b is the shadow's length times |b|
- and is not perpendicular in the ordinary sense unless the weights agree
- and it is linear in its first slot
- and so has the second
- and to the second
- between one and three stages
- between three and forty points
- between two and five columns
- between two and four vectors go in
- both weights are positive and no larger than twenty-five
- degree between one and five
- each column is three finite coordinates
- every neighbouring point of the plane is further from the target
- every point is a finite pair
- every point of the drawn curve has weighted length one
- every vector has the same number of finite coordinates
- every ε is between nought and one
- no division by nought
- no sampled value falls below the vertex
- on the smallest ε drawn, the classical order loses orthogonality outright
- removing a shadow never lengthens a vector
- the camera angles are within a half turn
- the classical order is never the better of the two
- the degree is 1, 2 or 3
- the dropped line meets b at a right angle
- the first basis vector has been scaled to length one
- the first vector is not zero
- the inequality holds for the weighted product too
- the least value is zero exactly when the two vectors are parallel
- the mode of the projection family is one of shadow, signs, schwarz, gram, qr, least, columns, weight, orthloss, legendre
- the modified order stays near the arithmetic's own precision
- the normal equations have a solution
- the nudged fit has one coefficient per column
- the nudged line is worse than the fitted one
- the pair still spans the same area, so it spans the same plane
- the parabola's least value is |a|² − (a·b)²/|b|²
- the plotted span is between 0.2 and 6
- the quadratic cannot have two distinct real roots
- the residual is perpendicular to the first column
- the second drawn vector is perpendicular in the weighted sense
- the sign of a·b follows the angle
- the target is three finite coordinates
- the target's squared length splits into the projection's and the residual's
- the two columns are independent, or they span a line rather than a plane
- the two vectors are not parallel, or there is nothing left after the subtraction
- the vector being bounded is two finite coordinates no larger than twelve
- the vector it is measured against is two finite coordinates no larger than twelve
- the vector projected onto is not zero
- the vectors are independent, so nothing vanishes at its own step
- the weighted product does not care about the order
- there are at least as many coordinates as vectors
- there are more points than coefficients, or nothing is being fitted
- two columns span the plane
- two vectors go in
- what is left after the subtraction is perpendicular to the first vector
quaternion
109 kinds of claim · 33 placements
- the units 1 and 2 lie on exactly one line ×21
- 24 of the 64 ordered pairs of units fail to commute
- 3 and 5 are each a sum of three squares and 15 is not, so no three-square identity exists
- a labelling exists on which every line reads in its own multiplication order
- a left multiplication and a right multiplication commute
- a product of whole octonions is whole
- a product of whole quaternions is whole
- a quaternion and its negative perform the same rotation
- all seven units are placed
- and every non-zero octonion still has an inverse
- and every one of them has length one
- and every one of them has squared length two
- and every point of a fibre lies over the same point of the sphere
- and every root sees the same profile of neighbours as every other
- and in the ring with halves it is closer than one, which is a division algorithm
- and its determinant is one, so it turns rather than reflects
- and most of every circle is still drawn, so the breaks read as crossings
- and no two circles touch
- and none of them has two arguments the same, which is alternativity
- and one hundred and twenty-eight have every coordinate a half
- and one is its negative
- and the five classes account for every root
- and the other six are straight
- and the quotient that achieves it is one of the halves
- and the rotations they perform number twelve, two units to each
- and the trace of its square gives the same two angles again
- and the twenty-four sit inside the hundred and twenty five times over
- and the two-square identity is the same statement in the plane
- and their real parts take nine values
- and they are twenty-four different quaternions
- and they are two hundred and forty different vectors
- and tilts within a right angle
- between two and eight circles are drawn
- conjugating a pure quaternion leaves it pure
- doubling the complex numbers gives Hamilton's own multiplication
- each circle is sampled at between 60 and 400 points
- each composite is a rotation rather than a reflection
- each unit has eight others at distance one, which is the 24-cell's vertex figure
- every icosian is counted once
- every number up to the bound is a sum of four squares
- every pair of circles is linked exactly once
- every pair of roots meets at an inner product of −2, −1, 0, 1 or 2
- every point of a fibre is on the unit three-sphere
- exactly one of the seven lines is the drawn circle
- fifty-six roots stand at sixty degrees to any given one
- i j k = −1, which is the rule the rest follows from
- in the whole-coordinate ring the quotient is a full unit away, so no remainder is smaller than the divisor
- its centre is exactly plus and minus one
- negating both quaternions gives the same rotation
- negating only one of them does not
- no drawn circle comes near the point the projection removes
- no two vertices project onto one another
- one full turn of the object leaves the quaternion at −1
- one hundred and twenty-six stand at a right angle
- one of them is the identity
- reflecting one root in another lands on a root
- sixty-four straddle the two halves
- some strand passes behind another, which is what makes the picture a diagram
- some triples of units fail to associate
- the associator changes sign when two of its arguments are swapped
- the base points sit at a latitude strictly inside the poles
- the columns of the map are orthonormal, so lengths are kept
- the eight squares of the product add to the product of the two sums of eight squares
- the first quaternion is four whole numbers no larger than twenty
- the four squares of the product add to the product of the two sums of four squares
- the highlighted line is one of the seven, or none
- the highlighted product is ij, ji, squares, or none
- the icosians number one hundred and twenty
- the left quaternion is four numbers
- the left quaternion is meant to have length one
- the lift really does send i to the base point
- the multiplication is associative on every triple of units
- the numbers that really need four squares are the ones Legendre's condition names
- the octonions are not even associative
- the plane has seven lines
- the quaternion has length one
- the quaternions do not commute
- the reals commute
- the right quaternion is four numbers
- the right quaternion is meant to have length one
- the rotation after one full turn is the identity again
- the second quaternion is four whole numbers no larger than twenty
- the solid has ninety-six edges
- the sums of squares are checked between 20 and 400 far
- the sweep is taken in 8 to 24 steps, a multiple of four
- the system is symmetric under negation
- the tower stops at dimension 1, 2, 4 or 8
- the trace of the matrix is twice the sum of the cosines of the two angles
- the turn is between a tenth and a half of a full circle
- the two blocks are orthogonal
- the two blocks are shaded or not
- the two orders give different quaternions
- the two rotations move at least one axis a long way apart
- the units are closed under multiplication
- the view is one the family draws
- the view is tilted between minus ninety and ninety degrees
- the view turns by a real angle
- there are twenty-four units
- there are two hundred and forty roots
- they are closed under multiplication
- thirty of them are half-turns
- twenty-four in the last four
- twenty-four of them are the Hurwitz units
- twenty-four roots live in the first four coordinates
- two different axes from i, j, k
- two full turns bring it back to 1
- two-dimensional inputs give a two-dimensional answer, which is why the plane closes
- which are themselves closed under multiplication
- which is all of them, counted twice by two different rules
wiring
84 kinds of claim · 28 placements
- the homomorphisms to the cyclic group of order 2 number 2 ×5
- the class of shape 3+1 has 8 members by the formula too ×4
- the class of shape 2+1+1 has 6 members by the formula too ×3
- all 24 permutations are listed ×2
- all 24 permutations of 4 places are listed ×2
- the class of shape 1+1+1+1 has 1 members by the formula too ×2
- the class of shape 4 has 6 members by the formula too ×2
- a single closed tour moves the tiles in one cycle
- a tour of 4 squares cycles 3 tiles
- adding a detour changes the crossing count by an even number
- and at least one target admits the sign
- and exactly two of the squares are unit squares
- and its sign is what a cycle of that length has
- and no face turn changes the joint parity of the two permutations
- and one of the two is the sign
- and the half they generate is the even permutations
- and the other is the odd side
- and the sign is constant on it, which is why the sign is a function of the shape
- and the squares of their dimensions add to the size of the group
- and they are the same size
- because a single exchange is odd
- between five and two hundred scrambles
- between twenty and two thousand scrambles
- each scramble is between five and two hundred turns
- each scramble is between ten and four hundred moves
- each step of the tour moves the blank one square
- every board one legal move from a reachable one has the same parity
- every one of the eighteen turns was tried at every position
- every reachable arrangement has the same sign-and-blank-distance parity
- exactly half of the 720 arrangements can be reached
- exactly half the permutations are even
- exactly two of them are one-dimensional
- exchanging two tiles puts the board on the other value of the invariant
- no face turn flips the edges as a whole
- no face turn twists the corners as a whole
- no legal move leaves the component it starts in
- one component is the even side
- one corner twisted breaks its own invariant
- one corner twisted breaks only its own invariant
- one edge flipped breaks its own invariant
- one edge flipped breaks only its own invariant
- swapping two places flips the sign of every permutation
- swapping two tiles leaves the puzzle unsolvable
- the blank comes back to where it started
- the board is between nine and sixteen squares
- the board is between two and twelve squares
- the board is small enough to exhaust — at most six squares
- the characters are orthonormal under the group's own average
- the class of shape 1+1+1+1+1 has 1 members by the formula too
- the classes account for every permutation exactly once
- the commutators generate exactly half the group
- the commutators themselves are inside the subgroup they generate
- the cyclic groups tested have orders between two and eight
- the detour is between 1 and 3 extra loops
- the even classes together are exactly half the group
- the group is on three, four or five places
- the identity's column holds each representation's dimension
- the invariant is the same at both ends of the tour
- the long decomposition is the same permutation
- the matrix is 3×3 with whole entries no larger than 20
- the number of swaps has the parity of the crossing count
- the permutation sends each of its 4 places somewhere different
- the reachable side has twelve arrangements
- the route is between three and nine squares of the board
- the second decomposition is 1 to 3 swaps longer, in pairs
- the short decomposition really is this permutation
- the sign of the arrangement alone does change, so it is not by itself the invariant
- the signed sum over permutations is the determinant
- the solved board has parity zero
- the squares are drawn for three, four or five places
- the squares of the dimensions add to the size of the group
- the strings cross exactly as often as the pairs are out of order
- the table is between 3 and 8 columns wide
- the table is drawn for 2, 3 or 4 places
- the table is drawn for three, four or five places
- the tour starts from the blank's home square
- the two components account for every arrangement
- the view is one the family draws
- the whole graph is drawn only for the two-by-two board
- there are exactly as many irreducible characters as conjugacy classes
- two decompositions of one permutation have the same parity
- two pieces exchanged breaks its own invariant
- two pieces exchanged breaks only its own invariant
- with nothing odd among them
Discrete
12 families
bipartite
17 kinds of claim · 11 placements
- round 1 still has a matching covering every vertex ×3
- and every neighbour named is a vertex on the right
- and no vertex is matched twice
- and so does every vertex on the right
- and the reason is a set with too few neighbours between them
- and the rounds use up every edge exactly once
- between two and four graphs the family knows are compared
- every edge gets exactly one colour
- every matched pair is an edge of the graph
- every vertex on the left has a neighbour list
- every vertex on the left has the same degree
- the graph is one the family knows
- the largest matching is exactly the left side less the worst deficiency
- the table has both a graph that succeeds and a graph that fails
- the view is one the family draws
- this view is for a graph that has no complete matching
- this view is for a graph whose matching covers the whole left side
clock
19 kinds of claim · 19 placements
- the walk reaches m × n / gcd cells on a 3 by 5 grid ×3
- a dial needs at least three positions
- a row is a permutation exactly when its multiplier is coprime to the modulus
- every non-zero row is a permutation exactly when the modulus is prime
- every residue has a place on the dial
- every row of the addition table is a permutation
- it fills the whole grid exactly when the moduli are coprime
- multiplying `order` times returns to 1
- the arithmetic and the walk agree
- the drawn entry is the arithmetic
- the drawn walk passes the top as often as the division says
- the first modulus is between 2 and 12
- the multiplier is not zero
- the orbit visits each residue once before closing
- the order divides m − 1, which is Fermat's little theorem
- the period is the least common multiple
- the second modulus is between 2 and 12
- the walk is between one and 144 steps
- the walk runs at least one full period
complete-graph
61 kinds of claim · 37 placements
- on 3 points, avoiding a complete graph on 3 allows Turán's count ×7
- there is some n at which the expected count of 4-sets is below one ×5
- and the codes are all 3 sequences of length 1 ×4
- on 3 points no two trees share a code ×4
- K4: the counting bound and the best drawing found agree about whether it lies flat ×3
- and 6 is below the known R(4,4) of 18 ×2
- K5: the best drawing found has one crossing ×2
- the most triangle-free edges on 6 points is ⌊n²/4⌋ ×2
- there are exactly n to the n minus two trees on 4 labelled points ×2
- a tree is given as a list of pairs of points
- a tree with more than one edge always has a leaf to strip
- a vertex meets five others
- and every pair gets one colour either way round
- and in fact at least two, which is Goodman's bound
- and it is the edge count of the balanced two-part graph
- and no tree is listed twice
- and the bound for graphs with no triangle rules out K3,3
- and the layout kept is one a reader can follow
- and the next size up is the first with an expectation of at least one
- and the two colours take half the pairs each
- at least one colouring is tried, and at most twenty thousand
- each clique size counted is between 3 and 8
- each clique size is a whole number between 3 and 8
- EVERY colouring of six people contains a monochromatic triangle
- every edge the extremal graph is missing would complete a triangle
- every pair is coloured exactly once
- every tree is drawn for between 3 and 5 points
- five edges in the pentagon
- K5 has ten edges
- K6 has fifteen edges
- minus one is itself a square, so the rule does not depend on which way round the pair is taken
- no triangle has all three edges the same colour
- stretching the drawing to fill its panel changes no crossing
- the bijection is checked up to between 3 and 6 points
- the bound is of the order of 2 to the k over 2
- the code is two shorter than the number of points
- the colouring is drawn on 5, 13 or 17 points, each a prime one more than a multiple of four
- the colouring treats its two colours alike, so the largest sets match
- the dial has a radius between 40 and 400
- the expectation is swept to between 20 and 200 points
- the extremal graph splits the points in two with every edge crossing
- the first complete graph the bound rules out is K5
- the forbidden complete graphs have between three and five points
- the labelled points number between 3 and 7
- the majority colour is one of the two
- the Paley colouring is drawn on 5, 13 or 17 points
- the search found a layout that is not degenerate
- the search runs on between three and six points
- the seed is a whole number the colouring can be drawn from
- the sweep runs to between 20 and 200 points
- the table or the check runs to a size the enumeration can reach
- the table runs to between 5 and 12 points
- the table runs to between four and six points
- the three ends make three pairs, and any one of them closes a trio
- the tree drawn has one fewer edge than it has points
- the tree encoded has between 4 and 7 points
- the view is one the family draws
- this colouring has a monochromatic triangle
- two colours over five edges forces three of one
- two of the three cannot be drawn flat
- while it allows the two that can be drawn flat
euler-path
54 kinds of claim · 30 placements
- the number of cycles for words of 2 letters matches 2^(2^(n−1) − n) ×3
- the strings of length 4 found come in whole rotations ×3
- and 2 in ×2
- every vertex has 2 edges out ×2
- a closed circuit needs every degree even
- a closed circuit over every edge visits one more vertex than it has edges
- a closed walk over every edge visits one more vertex than it has edges
- all four landmasses have odd degree
- an even degree pairs every arrival with a departure
- an odd degree leaves exactly one edge unpaired
- an open walk needs exactly two odd degrees
- and none of them appears twice
- and one edge per word
- and the greedy rule gives the greatest of those that begin with n zeros
- and the position found is the one the patch was taken from
- each word is smaller than all its rotations
- every vertex drawn is a vertex used
- every window of two consecutive symbols is a different pair
- every word of the right length appears in the cycle
- in the other direction too
- Königsberg has seven bridges
- landmass E has degree 3
- landmass I has degree 5
- landmass N has degree 3
- landmass S has degree 3
- no cyclic sequence of 6 symbols shows every pair from 4 exactly once
- no Euler walk exists
- the alphabet has two or three letters
- the circuit uses every pair once
- the concatenation is a de Bruijn sequence
- the count grows with the word length
- the degrees add to twice the number of edges
- the even panel really shows an even degree
- the example graph is a path or a circuit
- the graph drawn has at most nine vertices
- the graph has one vertex per word one letter shorter
- the greedy rule also produces a de Bruijn sequence
- the ground set has between four and seven elements
- the lengths of the necklaces add to the number of words, which is Witt's identity
- the necklace concatenation is the least de Bruijn sequence
- the odd panel really shows an odd degree
- the patch appears at exactly one position of the array
- the patch is taken from inside the sheet drawn
- the rows are not all de Bruijn sequences in their own right
- the search runs to words of three or four letters
- the sequence is as long as the number of words
- the sixteen positions give sixteen different blocks
- the torus drawn is the four-by-four one
- the view is one the family draws
- the walk uses every edge
- the windows are all different
- the words are between two and five letters long
- the words are between two and four letters long
- the words are listed in lexicographic order
flow
28 kinds of claim · 6 placements
- the road a to d is carrying its full 1 ×2
- and it is also what reaches the sink
- and removing that many roads disconnects the two ends
- each route continues until it reaches the sink
- every road of this network has capacity one
- every way of splitting the middle places is a cut and is listed
- everything arriving at a leaves again
- everything arriving at b leaves again
- everything arriving at c leaves again
- everything arriving at d leaves again
- everything arriving at e leaves again
- everything arriving at f leaves again
- no cut is smaller than the flow, over every cut there is
- no road carries more than its capacity
- no two routes share a road
- the cut is either drawn or it is not
- the network is one this family draws
- the road a to c is carrying its full 2
- the road a to t is carrying its full 1
- the road b to d is carrying its full 2
- the road b to t is carrying its full 4
- the road s to b is carrying its full 3
- the road s to c is carrying its full 3
- the smallest cut and the largest flow are the same number
- the smallest of them equals the largest flow
- the value is what leaves the source
- the view is one the family draws
- there are as many routes as the flow's value
genfun
15 kinds of claim · 6 placements
- the coefficient of x^0 is the number of combinations totalling 0 ×10
- the coefficient of x^0 is the number of objects of size 0 ×9
- the coefficient of x^0 is the sum along its diagonal ×7
- and the marked coefficient counts the combinations written out beside it
- between two and four boxes, each offering between two and five whole-number values
- both series are short lists of small whole numbers
- every combination of choices is listed
- the marked coefficient is a small whole power
- the marked coefficient is inside the product
- the marked total is one the boxes can reach
- the sequence is growing, so the check has content
- the sequence is one the family knows
- the series inverted has a non-zero constant term
- the series is drawn to between 5 and 10 terms
- the view is one the family draws
map-colour
26 kinds of claim · 23 placements
- region 0 touches region 1 ×21
- deleting and contracting account for the count at 0 colours ×6
- a colour has been freed for the middle
- after: no edge joins two regions of one colour
- an odd rim needs four and an even rim three
- before: no edge joins two regions of one colour
- between 3 and 6 rows are drawn
- colours are counted up to between 3 and 7
- every one of the seven regions touches every other
- four colours are enough
- no graph with an edge can be coloured with no colours
- no two neighbouring regions share a colour
- nor with one, when it has an edge
- the case is the one where the chain reaches or the one where it does not
- the chain reaches the far neighbour exactly in the blocked case
- the chain that is swapped does not reach the other neighbour of its pair
- the chromatic number is where the count first becomes positive
- the construction shown is the seven-region one
- the five neighbours use five different colours, which is the only hard case
- the graph is one the family draws
- the map can be coloured with at most five
- the map has between 4 and 24 regions
- the vertical step is 2, 3 or 4
- the view is one the family draws
- the wheel has between 3 and 23 rim regions
- with the middle coloured: no edge joins two regions of one colour
number-spiral
8 kinds of claim · 8 placements
- a marked square holds a prime, and an unmarked one does not
- and 41² is where it fails
- consecutive integers are neighbours on the spiral
- Euler's polynomial is prime for forty values in a row and then is not
- no two integers land on the same square
- the first polynomial really is the prime-richer one over the range drawn
- the sieve starts where the primes do
- there are primes to compare against
pascal
32 kinds of claim · 31 placements
- the exponent of 2 in row 0, entry 0 is the number of carries ×756
- row 0, entry 0 of Pascal's triangle ×91
- row 0, entry 0 is the binomial coefficient ×45
- 2 divides the coefficient at least 1 times ×8
- the routes to the cut at height 0 are counted both ways ×4
- and no more than 3 times ×3
- between 6 and 40 rows ×2
- the exponent of 2 in the coefficient is the number of carries ×2
- the run down diagonal 2 adds to the entry at row 7, place 3 ×2
- at most twenty routes are drawn
- between 1 and 6 steps up
- between 1 and 8 steps across
- classifying routes by where they cross the diagonal accounts for all of them
- every entry of the drawn triangle was checked both ways
- k is strictly between nought and n
- n is between 2 and 200
- row 6 adds to two to the power 6
- row 6 with alternating signs adds to nought
- shallow diagonal 8 adds to a Fibonacci number
- the base is a prime between 2 and 11
- the cut is a diagonal strictly inside the grid
- the diagonal is one the triangle holds
- the identity is one the mode draws
- the mode of the pascal family is one of numbers, parity, mod, sierpinski, sums, paths, carries
- the routes counted by the additive rule agree with the coefficient
- the row count is a whole number between 1 and 64
- the row is one the triangle holds
- the row's double is inside the triangle, or the total cannot be pointed at
- the run starts inside the triangle and leaves room for its total
- the shallow diagonal is one the triangle holds
- the squares of row 4 add to the middle entry of row 8
- the subdivision depth is a whole number between 1 and 8
pigeonhole
6 kinds of claim · 11 placements
- each case really does overflow its boxes
- every item is in a box
- more items than boxes forces a box with two
- the fullest box holds ⌈items/holes⌉
- there are at least as many things as boxes
- there is at least one box
progression
23 kinds of claim · 11 placements
- nothing survives at 9 either ×7
- a point set in general position was found for every seed
- and all three sizes of hull turned up in the test
- and four of them in convex position
- and its longest fall is n
- and neither colour can be given to the next number without making one
- and the extra term's label leaves the n by n square it would have to fit in
- and the surviving lengths run right up to it with no gap
- between one and four seeded point sets are drawn
- every five points in general position hold four in convex position
- every term carries a different pair of counters
- its longest climb is n
- one more term and a climb or a fall of n+1 appears
- the claim is tested on between 200 and 20,000 point sets
- the colouring drawn contains no such pattern
- the exhaustive search runs to between 5 and 14 numbers
- the extremal sequence has n² terms
- the panels drawn show different hull sizes
- the pattern is a progression or a sum
- the search reaches a length at which no colouring survives
- the search runs to between 5 and 14 numbers
- the sequence is built from between 2 and 5 blocks
- the view is one the family draws
triangulation
51 kinds of claim · 36 placements
- and it agrees with the closed form at n = 0 ×13
- the coefficient of x^1 is the convolution the equation demands ×12
- C(0) two ways ×9
- a 6-gon has C(4) triangulations ×4
- every triangulation has 3 flips available ×3
- the paths that stay above number the 5-th Catalan number ×3
- the non-crossing pairings of 8 points number C(4) ×2
- a hexagon has fourteen triangulations
- a polygon to be cut into triangles has between 3 and 10 sides
- a triangle that is not rainbow has exactly one other door
- a triangulation of the polygon has three fewer chords than the polygon has sides
- and every path is one or the other
- and one step below it
- and six are pentagons
- and so is the number of doors along the bottom edge
- and stays under four
- and the edge count is the handshake count
- and the one drawn ends in a triangle carrying all three colours
- and the scaled sequence climbs towards one from below
- and the third the third
- and twenty-one flips between them
- at least one corridor from the bottom edge ends in a rainbow triangle
- by the largest term drawn the scaled value is as close to one as Stirling predicts
- each cut uses n−3 diagonals
- Euler's relation holds on the solid these faces make
- every diagram pairs off all the points
- every pairing is drawn, so the point count is small
- every path is drawn, so the grid is small
- every reflected path ends one step right of the corner
- every triangulation of a hexagon has three flips
- every vertex carries a colour its position allows
- no two chords cross
- no two chords of the triangulation cross
- one flip at a time reaches every triangulation
- so the good ones are the difference of two binomial coefficients
- the bad paths number the paths to the shifted corner
- the first corner takes the first colour
- the flip graph is drawn for a polygon of 4 to 6 sides
- the good paths number the Catalan number
- the grid is between 3 and 8 on a side
- the grid the triangle is cut into has side between 3 and 12
- the number of small triangles carrying all three colours is odd
- the reflection is one-to-one on the bad paths
- the second corner the second
- the successive ratio climbs at every step
- the triangle is cut into a grid of side between 3 and 12
- the view is one the family draws
- the walk never enters the same triangle twice
- the word is a balanced one that never goes negative
- the words of this length number the Catalan number
- three of the faces are squares
Topology
9 families
euler-solid
43 kinds of claim · 19 placements
- V − E + F is 0 for this solid ×3
- a spanning tree has one fewer edge than the graph has vertices
- and 720° is 360° times V − E + F
- and its twelve edges
- between one and three holes are punched
- each unfolded face closes back on the corner
- every edge lies between exactly two faces
- every edge of the cube is shared by two faces
- every edge of the dodecahedron is shared by two faces
- every edge of the icosahedron is shared by two faces
- every edge of the octahedron is shared by two faces
- every edge of the surface is shared by exactly two faces
- every edge of the tetrahedron is shared by two faces
- no leftover edge closes a loop among the faces
- the alternating sum is not 2, on a solid with flat faces and straight edges
- the defects on the cube come to 720°
- the defects on the dodecahedron come to 720°
- the defects on the icosahedron come to 720°
- the defects on the octahedron come to 720°
- the defects on the tetrahedron come to 720°
- the faces at a corner of the cube do not close up flat
- the faces at a corner of the dodecahedron do not close up flat
- the faces at a corner of the icosahedron do not close up flat
- the faces at a corner of the octahedron do not close up flat
- the faces at a corner of the tetrahedron do not close up flat
- the flattened cube keeps its eight corners
- the flattened cube still gives 2
- the leftover edges are what the tree did not use
- the leftover edges join every face to every other
- the leftover edges number one fewer than there are faces
- the mode is one the family draws
- the solid is one of the five regular ones
- the solid is one the family builds
- the tree is grown from one of the graph's own vertices
- the tree reaches every vertex
- the two trees together use every edge exactly once
- V − E + F is -2 for this solid
- V − E + F is 2 for the cube
- V − E + F is 2 for the dodecahedron
- V − E + F is 2 for the icosahedron
- V − E + F is 2 for the octahedron
- V − E + F is 2 for the tetrahedron
- which is V − E + F = 2
fixed-point
45 kinds of claim · 25 placements
- and has no direction to choose there
- and it is inside the disc
- and it lies inside the disc
- and it sits exactly on the rim
- and second
- and sits on it
- and the crossing found is a genuine zero
- and the second
- and the sweep finds points that barely move, near it
- at the left end the map moves the point right or not at all
- at the right end it moves it left or not at all
- between 8 and 120 arrows are drawn per panel
- dipole has the index it claims
- each set is swept at between 200 and 20,000 points
- every arrow is tangent to the sphere
- every orbit runs into the fixed point
- no point of a ring, turned stays where it is, and none comes close
- no point of the whole plane, shifted stays where it is, and none comes close
- saddle has the index it claims
- so every point of the open disc moves
- so it has opposite signs at the two ends of a half turn
- so the sweep crosses zero at least twice
- source has the index it claims
- the annulus is turned by between 5 and 175 degrees
- the control's fixed point is fixed, first coordinate
- the difference reverses sign between opposite points
- the field is one the figure knows
- the field vanishes at the pole
- the fixed point is unique
- the halving map does have a fixed point
- the imbalance changes sign somewhere in half a turn
- the line halves the first shape
- the map is one the figure knows
- the map keeps the interval inside itself
- the map sends the disc into itself
- the pair found really does take the same value
- the point found really is fixed
- the ring is turned by between 5 and 175 degrees
- the solved point is fixed, first coordinate
- the solved point is fixed, second
- the sweep takes between 36 and 2000 samples
- the two shapes cut have between 3 and 12 sides each
- the view is one the family draws
- turning the line through half a turn reverses the imbalance
- which the open disc does not contain
gluing
52 kinds of claim · 27 placements
- a sphere with 3 cross-caps has characteristic -1 ×3
- a surface with 2 handles has characteristic -2 ×2
- the classification is drawn up to 3 of them in this view ×2
- a non-orientable surface and an orientable one share the characteristic and differ
- a sphere has characteristic 2
- a sphere with 1 cross-cap has characteristic 1
- a sphere with 2 cross-caps has characteristic 0
- a torus has characteristic 0
- aba⁻¹b⁻¹ gives the characteristic of a torus
- aba⁻¹b⁻¹ has the Euler characteristic a torus has
- aba⁻¹b⁻¹ is orientable
- abab gives the characteristic of a projective plane
- abab has the Euler characteristic a projective plane has
- abab is not orientable
- abab⁻¹ gives the characteristic of a Klein bottle
- abab⁻¹ has the Euler characteristic a Klein bottle has
- abab⁻¹ is not orientable
- abb⁻¹a⁻¹ has the Euler characteristic a sphere has
- abb⁻¹a⁻¹ is orientable
- and every face to a face
- and no edge to itself
- and no face to itself
- and no vertex is its own opposite, so the map moves every point
- and ten faces
- and the quotient's is a projective plane's
- and thirty edges
- and twenty faces
- between one and five cross-caps are drawn
- between one and five gluings are drawn side by side
- edge a is glued to exactly one other edge
- edge b is glued to exactly one other edge
- edge c is glued to exactly one other edge
- edge d is glued to exactly one other edge
- every vertex has its opposite among the vertices
- fifteen edges
- no two of the surfaces share a characteristic
- the antipodal map carries every edge to an edge
- the camera angles are numbers
- the cover's characteristic is twice the surface's, because every cell is doubled
- the drawing scale is sane
- the drawn range reaches at least one characteristic that both sides hold
- the icosahedron has twelve vertices
- the icosahedron's characteristic is a sphere's
- the name follows from the number
- the name follows from the two numbers
- the orientable row is on or off
- the polygon has an even number of edges
- the quotient has six vertices
- the two numbers name the surface without anything else being consulted
- the two surfaces with the same characteristic are told apart by orientability
- the view is one the family draws
- the word glues every edge to exactly one other
knot
56 kinds of claim · 32 placements
- the Borromean rings: the diagram's count and Gauss's integral agree for components 1 and 2 ×3
- the figure-eight knot: 3 colours are available exactly when 3 divides its determinant ×3
- the figure-eight knot: the count with 3 colours ×3
- the trefoil: 3 colours are available exactly when 3 divides its determinant ×3
- the trefoil: the count with 3 colours ×3
- the unknot: 3 colours are available exactly when 3 divides its determinant ×3
- the unknot: the count with 3 colours ×3
- three rings in a chain: the diagram's count and Gauss's integral agree for components 1 and 2 ×3
- a colouring is drawn on a diagram that has crossings
- a colouring uses three, five or seven colours
- a diagram with k crossings is cut into k arcs
- a loop that dips through and back: punctures and crossings agree
- a loop that dips through and back: the diagram's count and Gauss's integral agree for components 1 and 2
- and Gauss's integral, which sees no disc at all, gives it too
- and one whose linking number is bigger than one
- and the one found uses all three
- and their signs add to an even number
- and they reach zero in two different ways — one with no punctures, one with two that cancel
- at every crossing the three arcs are all alike or all different
- at least two of the links have linking number zero
- between three and five deformation sizes, none of them large
- between two and four links the family knows
- each crossing has exactly one of its two strands going underneath
- no single arc passes over every crossing
- the (2, 4) torus link: the diagram's count and Gauss's integral agree for components 1 and 2
- the constant colourings are always allowed, so there are at least p
- the figure-eight knot admits a colouring using more than one of the 5 colours
- the figure-eight knot has the crossings it claims
- the first component of this link is a flat circle, so its disc is the obvious one
- the Hopf link: punctures and crossings agree
- the Hopf link: the diagram's count and Gauss's integral agree for components 1 and 2
- the knot is one the figure knows
- the knots in the table have different determinants
- the link is one the family knows
- the linking number is the same at every deformation
- the punctures added with signs give the linking number
- the strand is broken where it goes underneath, not somewhere else
- the table contains a link whose components cross and whose linking numbers are all zero
- the table is ordered by crossing number
- the table's columns are small primes
- the trefoil admits a colouring in more than one colour
- the trefoil admits a colouring using more than one of the 3 colours
- the trefoil has the crossings it claims
- the trefoil is three arcs
- the two computations agree at this deformation
- the two loops stay clear of each other at every amplitude
- the unknot is a single arc
- the view is one the family draws
- there are nine three-colourings of the trefoil in all
- there are three moves, and Reidemeister proved there are no others
- twice the over-strand equals the two under-strands added, at every crossing
- two circles side by side: punctures and crossings agree
- two circles side by side: the diagram's count and Gauss's integral agree for components 1 and 2
- two closed curves cross an even number of times
- two or three links whose first component is a flat circle
- while the number of crossings is not
loops
118 kinds of claim · 64 placements
- on the 1-sheeted cover, the lift of a loop winding 0 times closes exactly when it should ×24
- generator 1 acts as a permutation of the 3 sheets ×14
- the rank comes out at 1 + 3(2 − 1), which is the index times one less than the rank below ×9
- a loop winding 0 times lifts to a closed path exactly when 0 is a multiple of 3 ×7
- vertex 1 has at most one a leaving it ×4
- vertex 1 has at most one b leaving it ×4
- the loop drawn for class 0 is a whole number ×3
- the loop drawn for class -2 is a whole number ×2
- a class on the torus is a pair of whole numbers, not both zero
- a free group of rank two has four words of length one
- a spanning tree of a connected graph has one edge fewer than it has vertices
- and are not under the other one
- and at most one arriving
- and at the same height
- and by the end the loop has been dragged through the hole
- and consecutive ones differ by exactly one turn
- and exactly one arriving
- and in the second, so it closes up on the torus
- and inside the outer boundary
- and it goes round each hole a net zero times
- and its degree is even
- and its degree is odd
- and the same word cancels to nothing on the wedge, where it stays four letters long
- and the top and bottom as many times as its second
- and their number divides the number of sheets
- and they are those multiples in order
- and twelve of length two
- between one and five words to be refused
- between one and four generator words in a, b and their inverses
- both loops start at the same point of the ring
- carrying the loop along either path leaves its class alone
- each loop on the torus is a pair of whole numbers, not both zero
- each sheet has exactly one edge of each label leaving it
- every cover's counted rank matches the formula
- every point of the fibre projects onto the marked point of the circle
- every sheet is reached by some word, so the cover is connected
- in the disc every stage of the shrink stays inside
- no sample of the loop lands on the point it is wound about
- no step of the walk turns more than a quarter of a turn
- no two deck transformations agree on the base vertex
- over the line, the only loop that lifts to a loop is the one that goes nowhere
- running one loop then the other adds the counts
- so the two maps are not the same map
- so the whole fibre sits over one point
- so there are at most as many symmetries as sheets
- the a's in the word add up to the winding number about that hole
- the b's in the word add up to the winding number about that hole
- the base circle itself does not lift to a loop
- the bouquet below has two or three circles
- the bouquet has between one and four circles
- the bouquet has two to four circles
- the classes drawn are whole numbers no bigger than four
- the classes that lift to loops are the multiples of the sheet count
- the commutator does not cancel down any further
- the commutator has exponent sum zero in the first generator
- the composition of two deck transformations is one
- the cover has between two and five sheets
- the cover has between two and four sheets
- the cover is connected, so its deck group acts on one object
- the cover is connected, so the index argument applies
- the cover is connected, so the sheets are one orbit
- the curve about the left hole is a whole number
- the curve about the right hole is a whole number
- the degree of the map that is not odd is a whole number
- the degree of the odd map is a whole number
- the drawing shows between two and five turns
- the edges outside the tree are exactly the free generators the graph carries
- the first loop is a whole number
- the first map really does send opposite points to opposite points
- the folded graph has at least one independent loop
- the free group outgrows the abelian group of the same rank
- the generator aa is accepted by the folded graph
- the generator ab is accepted by the folded graph
- the generator abab is accepted by the folded graph
- the generator abaB is accepted by the folded graph
- the generator ba is accepted by the folded graph
- the generator bb is accepted by the folded graph
- the hole is between a fifth and three fifths of the ring
- the identity is a deck transformation
- the index of the subgroup is the number of sheets
- the lift ends a whole number of turns above where it started
- the loop at p is a whole number
- the loop being lifted is a whole number
- the loop drawn at p has the class claimed
- the loop drawn for a class really has that class
- the loop lifted goes round between one and four times
- the loop lifted is the one asked for
- the loop lifted winds between zero and six times
- the loop stays clear of the hole
- the loops composed have counts no bigger than three
- the loops tabulated wind between zero and eight times
- the marked point is on the base circle
- the monodromy table is drawn over two generators
- the number of sheets is what one lap advances by
- the path crosses the side edges as many times as its first count says
- the probe's two images are exactly opposite under the odd map
- the second loop is a whole number
- the second map does not, which is what makes it a control
- the shrink is legal to begin with and stops being legal
- the slide is drawn in three to five stages
- the symmetries reach every sheet exactly when there are as many of them as sheets
- the table runs to between three and six sheets
- the table runs to between two and six sheets
- the two run one after the other is a whole number
- the two squares never overlap during the slide
- the view is one the family draws
- the winding number is a whole number
- the word a is refused
- the word aa is refused
- the word ab is refused
- the word b is refused
- the word is one this family realises
- the word read off the curve is the word the curve was built from
- the words that come back are closed under composition
- two or three circles below
- two words land on the same sheet exactly when one undoes the other into the subgroup
- while a word that really is trivial reduces away, so the test can fail
- words of length up to two to four are listed
mobius
16 kinds of claim · 16 placements
- and between 24 and 140 the long way
- between none and sixteen cross-sections are outlined
- between three and nine frames are drawn along the band
- carrying the surface round once brings it back on the other face
- going once round the long way returns to the point with the cross-section reversed
- going once round the tube returns to the same point
- the band is drawn at a whole number of half-twists
- the frame comes back the same size — only its sense can change
- the frame returns with a reversed sign exactly when the band is one-sided
- the gluing arrow matches the twist the figure is about
- the mesh is between 16 and 96 round the tube
- the self-intersection circle is on or off
- the tube's distance from the axis leaves the figure-eight room to close
- the view is one the family draws
- u = 0 and u = π are two different places on the surface and one place in space
- which is not the same point unless it is one the reversal fixes
mobius-cut
3 kinds of claim · 4 placements
- and one lap leaves one loop while two laps leave two
- the cut is inside the band
- the scissors take one lap down the middle and two off-centre
parity
66 kinds of claim · 28 placements
- none of the 594 pairs of non-neighbouring edges meet ×5
- a pair of horns at stage 1 is clasped, of linking number ±1 ×4
- stage 3 has 2^3 − 1 clasped pairs ×4
- ear clipping: a polygon of 20 corners is cut into 18 triangles ×2
- the image triangulation: a polygon of 20 corners is cut into 18 triangles ×2
- the source triangulation: a polygon of 20 corners is cut into 18 triangles ×2
- a line with a point removed falls into two pieces
- a plane with a line removed falls into two pieces
- a plane with a point removed stays in one piece
- a triangulation of a polygon has one diagonal fewer than it has triangles
- all 16 rays agree on the parity
- and a ray from the centre crosses it an even number of times
- and both insides keep a substantial part of the frame
- and is not linked with that horn's partner
- and the clasp shows as at least two crossings of the projection
- and the steepest chord anywhere grows geometrically as the scale shrinks
- and they disagree on the count, which is the point
- at every angle tried the chords steepen by more than fifteenfold over the scales measured
- between 2 and 36 rays are drawn
- consecutive squares in the visiting order are neighbours
- each square's side is at most 2⁻ⁿ, so the diameters go to zero
- ear clipping: no two triangles overlap
- ear clipping: the triangles account for exactly the polygon's own area
- every cell of the grid is visited exactly once
- every direction gives the same parity
- every direction of ray gives the same verdict at this point
- every simple polygon of four or more corners has an ear to clip
- halving the pitch more than halves the largest disc that fits
- horns from different clasps are not linked with each other
- no two of the kept squares overlap
- some sampled point is inside the curve
- space with a line removed stays in one piece
- the arms of the spiral are between 22 and 70 units apart
- the clipping terminates
- the counts themselves differ, which is why the parity is the claim
- the curve goes twice round its own centre
- the disc drawn touches no edge of the curve
- the drawn ray crosses the surface more than once
- the five-pointed loop crosses itself five times
- the horns shrink geometrically, so their tips converge
- the image triangulation: no two triangles overlap
- the image triangulation: the triangles account for exactly the polygon's own area
- the infinite product is bounded away from zero
- the kept area is the product of the stages' own factors
- the loop drawn goes once round one horn
- the magnification of the second panel is between 3 and 27
- the marked point is inside the frame, given as fractions of it
- the number of stages drawn is between 1 and 4
- the number of stages of horns is between 1 and 4
- the number of terms summed is between 2 and 6
- the outside point is clear of the tube
- the plane comes apart into exactly two pieces, no more and no fewer
- the point is put inside or outside
- the radius stays positive, so no two angles share a point
- the resolution of the flood fill is between 24 and 90
- the sample grid is between 8 and 40 columns
- the sampled inside agrees with the polygon's own area to within six per cent
- the second corridor is the narrower one
- the source triangulation: no two triangles overlap
- the source triangulation: the triangles account for exactly the polygon's own area
- the spiral turns between 1 and 6 times
- the terms roughen faster than they shrink
- the tube is closed up out of two triangles per patch
- the two triangles either side of a diagonal send a point on it to the same place
- the view is one the family draws
- two pitches, both inside the range the family draws
stereographic
34 kinds of claim · 36 placements
- the image of 0 lies on the circle ×14
- the ray to 0 passes through the pole ×14
- the image of -2 lies on the circle ×13
- the ray to -2 passes through the pole ×13
- a circle missing the pole projects to a circle, to within a fitted residual
- a circle through the pole projects to a straight line
- and no two of them meet
- and the south chart does have one there
- at least two finite points are carried across the projection
- between 2 and 24 rays are drawn — one ray is not a correspondence
- between a hundred and four thousand points checked
- between three and seven fibres, each at a latitude strictly inside the sphere
- dim and rays are read by the ray views alone
- each fibre lies on the unit three-sphere
- each transformation is normalised to determinant one
- every patch has the same area on the sphere
- every two fibres are linked exactly once, counted from the drawn curves
- nearly every sample lay in the overlap
- none of the circles in this list passes through the pole
- only the parabolic map has a repeated fixed point
- the crossing angle is the same on the sphere and in the plane
- the fitted transformation is invertible
- the image is on the ray from the pole through the point
- the image lands on the plane
- the north chart has no value at its own pole
- the projected patches are wildly unequal even though the originals are equal
- the projection is drawn from a circle or from a sphere
- the rotation, read in the plane, is exactly the fitted Möbius transformation
- the three chosen points determine the transformation
- the trace classifies the transformation as the label claims
- the two charts differ by the reciprocal at every point of the overlap
- the two charts miss different points
- the view is one the family draws
- there are pairs to link
Probability
10 families
bayes
16 kinds of claim · 12 placements
- and at three doors it is two thirds
- everybody has it, so everybody positive has it
- nobody has it, so nobody who tests positive has it
- one of the two strategies wins, and only one
- prior is a probability, between 0 and 1
- specificity is a probability, between 0 and 1
- staying wins as often as the first pick was right
- switching gets better with more doors
- switching wins two thirds against a host who knows, and half against one who does not
- the answer rises with the base rate
- the four cells fill the square
- the game needs at least three doors
- the ignorant host's story throws two of the six worlds away
- the ignorant-host variant is only drawn at three doors, where switching has one meaning
- the shaded fraction is Bayes' theorem
- the two strategies exhaust the possibilities
birthday
5 kinds of claim · 7 placements
- 22 is still under a half
- 23 is over it
- one person shares with nobody
- the half-way point is 23 people
- the pair count is k choose 2
buffon
7 kinds of claim · 9 placements
- at least one needle is dropped
- every needle claimed was drawn
- so a needle crosses with probability 2/π
- the area under half a sine wave is 1
- the box has area π/2
- the estimate is in a plausible range for pi
- the printed estimate is 2Ln / dc
chain
100 kinds of claim · 42 placements
- the wait for a new one at 0 seen is 6/6 ×21
- the 6 waits add to 6 times the harmonic sum ×3
- a run of the game reproduces the expected length
- a walk of 40000 steps spends about the solved share of its time at A
- a walk of 40000 steps spends about the solved share of its time at B
- a walk of 40000 steps spends about the solved share of its time at C
- and comes back to A about as often as the solve says
- and comes back to B about as often as the solve says
- and comes back to C about as often as the solve says
- and it is still climbing at the same rate
- and it really is stationary
- and that sum is bounded, so the shares can be normalised
- and the chance of ending at the top satisfies B = R + Q B
- and the chance of ever coming back is less than one
- and the chance of winning is the share of the stake held
- and the share of wins reproduces the computed chance
- and the traffic round the cycle is not equal in the two directions
- and they are the shares the rule leaves alone
- as much traffic goes from A to B as comes back
- as much traffic goes from A to C as comes back
- as much traffic goes from A to D as comes back
- as much traffic goes from A to E as comes back
- as much traffic goes from B to C as comes back
- as much traffic goes from B to D as comes back
- as much traffic goes from B to E as comes back
- as much traffic goes from C to D as comes back
- as much traffic goes from C to E as comes back
- as much traffic goes from D to E as comes back
- at even odds the expected length is k times N minus k
- at least two chains, so the comparison says something
- away from even odds the chance of winning is the ratio the odds give
- between six and sixty steps are drawn
- between two and four step-up chances are drawn
- every chain named is one the family carries
- every start can go either way
- every state has somewhere to go
- every state holds a share
- iterating from A reaches the same share for A
- iterating from A reaches the same share for B
- iterating from A reaches the same share for C
- no two edge weights are drawn on top of one another
- row A holds probabilities
- row B holds probabilities
- row C holds probabilities
- row D holds probabilities
- row E holds probabilities
- row F holds probabilities
- row G holds probabilities
- row H holds probabilities
- the chain is one of mixing, cycle, reducible, lazy
- the chain is one the family carries
- the chain with the smaller gap really does take longer
- the chance of a win is strictly between nothing and everything
- the chances of leaving A add to one
- the chances of leaving B add to one
- the chances of leaving C add to one
- the chances of leaving D add to one
- the chances of leaving E add to one
- the chances of leaving F add to one
- the chances of leaving G add to one
- the chances of leaving H add to one
- the corroborating run is between 500 and 40,000 games
- the cycle's forward chance is between a half and one
- the cycle's shares are stationary even so
- the cycle's stationary shares are equal
- the distance to stationarity never rises
- the drawing runs out to between 10 and 60 states
- the expected number of steps satisfies t = 1 + Q t
- the expected return to A is one over its share
- the expected return to B is one over its share
- the expected return to C is one over its share
- the game is played over between four and nine totals
- the long-run shares are drawn only for a chain that has them
- the measured decay rate is the second eigenvalue
- the measured mixing time follows the eigenvalue's prediction
- the number of kinds to collect is between 2 and 16
- the panels drawn are genuinely different cases
- the return chances satisfy the rule that defines them
- the rows never move further apart as the power rises
- the run is between 2,000 and 400,000 steps
- the run spends its time in A in the computed share
- the run spends its time in B in the computed share
- the run spends its time in C in the computed share
- the same current flows across every edge of the cycle
- the series is added over between 60 and 4,000 terms
- the share read off the weights is the share the equations give
- the shares add to one
- the solved share for A survives a step
- the solved share for B survives a step
- the solved share for C survives a step
- the stationary distribution adds to one
- the system is not singular
- the traffic between neighbours balances
- the view is one the family draws
- the walk is between a thousand and four hundred thousand steps
- the weights add to the geometric sum they are
- the weights are a square table of between three and six states
- the weights are all one, so the sum grows without bound
- the weights are symmetric and never negative
- the weights grow, so there is nothing to normalise
derange
52 kinds of claim · 32 placements
- the count for threshold 0 agrees with the formula ×7
- every one of the 5040 orders was tried ×4
- the counted best for 5 matches the formula ×4
- between three and twelve sizes, each between 2 and 20000 ×2
- the alternating sum lands on the 9 the search found ×2
- 9 of them leave nothing where it started
- all 24 arrangements are drawn
- an exhaustive point is at most 8 objects
- and comes within a few per cent of it
- and it does better than taking one at random
- and its height there is the same number
- and sends no two objects to the same place
- and settles above the 0.5802 the limit is, rather than falling to 1/e
- and so is the chance of success
- and stays below the limit it is climbing towards
- and the best single threshold secures at least half of it
- and the half is never breached
- and with three, 0.6842
- between three and ten sizes
- each correction crosses the answer rather than approaching it from one side
- each proportion is within one over the next factorial of 1/e
- no online rule beats the oracle
- skipping the certain one is worth exactly one, whatever the setting
- so does the threshold set at the median of the maximum
- the alternating sum reaches the same number
- the arrangement is a permutation of its own places
- the arrangement names every object exactly once
- the best achievable rank rises with the size of the field
- the best rule looks at some of them and not all of them
- the best threshold is heading for one over e
- the best threshold rises with the field
- the case is uniform or tight
- the chance falls as the field grows
- the exhaustive count is drawn for between 3 and 8 objects
- the grid of every arrangement is drawn for at most 5 objects
- the largest field drawn is already close to that limit
- the limit curve peaks at one over e
- the number of objects is in the range this view can enumerate
- the oracle is never beaten
- the rank the rule will accept gets stricter as more remain
- the ratio is drawn up to between 2 and 10 objects
- the settings are between nought and one
- the shortfall approaches the half as the setting shrinks
- the sizes drawn are between 3 and 400
- the standard demanded rises with the number still to come
- the value grid has between 200 and 2000 steps
- the view is one the family draws
- which is far above what the relative-ranking rule achieves
- with one object there is nothing to find, and the search finds nothing
- with three it is 3/2
- with two candidates the best expected rank is 5/4
- with two it wins three times in four
galton
6 kinds of claim · 12 placements
- a path bounces once per row
- and are centred under the funnel
- and ends in a bin the board has
- the exact bin shares add to one
- the path ends over the bin its right-turns name
- the row count is a whole number between 1 and 24
rgraph
38 kinds of claim · 33 placements
- the connected graphs on 4 points, counted twice by different means ×4
- above the threshold the measured share matches the equation's root
- and below it the largest piece is a vanishing share
- and below the threshold the equation has only the zero root
- and it is nonetheless not connected
- and it stays put to within half
- and the chance of at least one never exceeds the expected count, as Markov requires
- and the triangle's stays wider than it
- and well above it a triangle is nearly certain
- being connected is at most as likely as having no isolated point
- between four and forty samples at each size
- between one and four sizes, each at most six points
- between three and five sizes, each between fifty and twelve hundred
- between twenty and two hundred samples per point
- between two and four edge chances, each strictly between zero and one
- between two and four sizes, each between twenty and a hundred and forty
- connectivity's transition narrows relative to its threshold as the graph grows
- dividing by the two-thirds power is the division that stays put
- each sweep runs from mostly-absent to mostly-present
- every edge present is connected with probability one
- every point is in exactly one piece
- no edges is connected with probability zero
- the chance of being connected rises with p
- the comparison runs on between three and six points
- the component grows with the size, as it must
- the count of isolated points follows n·e⁻ᶜ
- the drawn graphs have between six and twenty points
- the enumeration runs on between two and six points
- the measured triangle count matches the expectation it is supposed to
- the number of points is between three and twenty
- the predicted share solves its own equation
- the range drawn reaches the connectivity threshold
- the sampled graphs have between sixty and three thousand points
- the sampled graphs have between two hundred and three thousand points
- the seed is a whole number the graphs can be drawn from
- the view is one the family draws
- well below the threshold a triangle is rare
- well past average degree one, most of the graph is in one piece
sample
36 kinds of claim · 21 placements
- row 0 of the transition matrix adds to one ×20
- the grid's error in 4 dimensions falls like N^(−2/4) ×5
- in 2 dimensions the grid is the faster ×2
- in 8 dimensions the grid is the slower ×2
- and a run of the chain reproduces it to within a twentieth
- and at four dimensions the two rates meet
- and holds no negative probability
- and is between 5 and 400 sharp
- and is positive everywhere on the interval, so no weight is unbounded
- and is repeated between 40 and 800 times
- and is run for between 2,000 and 200,000 steps
- and so is the weighted one — neither is biased
- and the Halton points' falls faster than that
- and the random one falls like N^(−1/2), whatever the dimension
- and the weighted one is appreciably quieter
- as much probability flows from i to j as back again
- between 32 and 2,048 points are drawn
- each dimension is a whole number between 1 and 12
- each estimate uses between 50 and 5,000 draws
- in 1 dimension the grid is the faster
- so a step leaves the target distribution where it was
- the chain has between 5 and 24 states
- the discarded start is shorter than the run
- the discrepancy is probed on a grid of between 40 and 300 boxes a side
- the grid's error in 1 dimension falls like N^(−2/1)
- the Halton points are more evenly spread than the random ones on this measure
- the peak sits inside the interval
- the plain average is centred on the answer
- the points to fit a slope through are not all at one place
- the proposal is a probability density
- the random points' discrepancy falls like one over the square root
- the seed is a whole number the drawing can be made from
- the spread is measured over between 4 and 200 runs
- the sweep runs over between 3 and 8 sizes
- the sweep runs to between 2^8 and 2^18 points
- the view is one the family draws
spread
105 kinds of claim · 41 placements
- coin summed 2 times has probabilities adding to one ×7
- coin summed 2 times has some spread to speak of ×7
- skew summed 2 times has probabilities adding to one ×7
- skew summed 2 times has some spread to speak of ×7
- die summed 2 times has probabilities adding to one ×6
- die summed 2 times has some spread to speak of ×6
- the sum of 4 divided by 4 has probabilities adding to one ×6
- the sum of 4 divided by 4 has some spread to speak of ×6
- the sum of 4 divided by the root of 4 has probabilities adding to one ×6
- the sum of 4 divided by the root of 4 has some spread to speak of ×6
- the average of 1 draws still has the distribution of one draw ×5
- the sum of 4 has probabilities adding to one ×4
- the sum of 4 has some spread to speak of ×4
- and doubling the draws moves it toward the computed one at 0.3 ×3
- at 1.5 standard deviations the mass outside is within the bound ×3
- the measured rate at 0.3 is never below the computed one ×3
- there are exactly 91 possible histograms of 12 draws over three faces ×3
- the largest sum is a power of two between 16 and 128 ×2
- 0 nine times in ten, 10 otherwise has probabilities adding to one
- 0 nine times in ten, 10 otherwise has some spread to speak of
- 0 nine times in ten, 10 otherwise stays under the bound at every width
- a die has probabilities adding to one
- a die has some spread to speak of
- a fair coin, ±1 has probabilities adding to one
- a fair coin, ±1 has some spread to speak of
- a fair coin, ±1 stays under the bound at every width
- a fair die has probabilities adding to one
- a fair die has some spread to speak of
- a fair die stays under the bound at every width
- and dividing by the root of n leaves it exactly where it started
- and increasing away from the mean
- and it comes within half the bound somewhere
- and its mean is exactly the level asked about
- and none is smaller than that divided by a polynomial in n
- and scaled so that one standard deviation is one unit
- and the more lopsided summand is further from the bell at every n
- and the rate at the mean itself is zero
- and the rate is the information distance from the original to the tilted law
- and the runs are further apart early than late
- and the second panel's settle on the height of the bell curve
- and the variance adds too
- between 2 and 12 runs are drawn
- between 2 and 3 summands are compared
- between 2 and 4 averages, each of at most 64 draws
- between 2,000 and 60,000 averages are formed
- between 3 and 40 draws
- between 3 and 6 sums, each of at most 200 copies
- between two and four levels are marked
- dividing by n shrinks the spread like 1/√n
- each distribution is one the family knows
- each n is between 2 and 200
- each run is between 50 and 5000 draws
- each sum is closer to the bell curve than the last
- each sum is of between 1 and 400 copies
- each window is between half a standard deviation and six
- every distribution swept is one the family knows
- every level is between the mean and the largest value
- every run finishes inside four standard errors of the mean
- five values, unevenly weighted has probabilities adding to one
- five values, unevenly weighted has some spread to speak of
- five values, unevenly weighted stays under the bound at every width
- it is centred at zero
- no histogram is more likely than exp(−nD)
- sixteen dice has probabilities adding to one
- sixteen dice has some spread to speak of
- so one scaling is collapsing
- the average of two Cauchys has the density of one Cauchy, by the convolution integral
- the bell curve convolved with itself is the bell curve again, widened by √2
- the bell curve's exponent differs from the rate by enough to show over the range drawn
- the bound is met at between 1.2 and 5 standard deviations
- the constrained region is not empty
- the constrained set has a probability strictly between nothing and everything
- the constraint asks for a mean above the true one and below the largest face
- the distribution has probabilities adding to one
- the distribution has some spread to speak of
- the distribution is one the family knows
- the event has positive probability at every n drawn
- the exact probability stays under the exponential the rate predicts
- the extremal distribution has probabilities adding to one
- the extremal distribution has some spread to speak of
- the first panel's curves grow taller as they narrow
- the gap for 0 nine times in ten, 10 otherwise falls like one over the square root of n
- the gap for a fair coin, ±1 falls like one over the square root of n
- the gap for a fair die falls like one over the square root of n
- the histograms' chances add to one
- the level asked about is above the mean and below the largest value the summand can take
- the level is between the mean and the largest value the summand takes
- the mass at exactly k standard deviations is the whole of the bound
- the mean of a sum is the sum of the means
- the measured decay rate agrees with the rate function computed from the summand alone
- the measured rate moves towards the smallest relative entropy in the region
- the measured rates come from between 16 and 96 draws
- the rate at a level away from the mean is positive
- the rate function is convex all the way along
- the scaled values are increasing
- the sweep includes a lopsided distribution
- the sweep runs to between 24 and 200 draws
- the tilted distribution has probabilities adding to one
- the tilted distribution has some spread to speak of
- the tilted weights are a distribution
- the view is one the family draws
- three face values
- three positive chances
- three positive chances adding to one
- while a light-tailed average narrows by the square root of the count
walk
54 kinds of claim · 35 placements
- the formula agrees with the enumeration at 0 steps above ×7
- the sum of 4 steps has probabilities adding to one ×4
- the sum of 4 steps has some spread to speak of ×4
- a walk in space escapes, and the simulation sees it
- a walk on a line comes back, and the horizon barely hides it
- a walk on a plane comes back too, but more slowly
- a walk takes a whole positive number of steps
- an endpoint has the parity of the step count
- an even number of steps between 8 and 200
- and impossible with everything
- and moves the start to its mirror image
- and so are the reflected ones
- and the distribution is symmetric
- and the gap to the bell curve closes at every step
- and the variance of its position is exactly the number of steps
- and their spread is the square root of the number of steps
- between 4 and 16 steps are drawn, since every path of them is enumerated
- each exact distribution is of between 2 and 400 steps
- each step moves one place along one axis
- every game drawn ends at a barrier
- every path from below the level has to cross it
- every path is counted once
- every step is drawn
- every step is one place, either way
- every walk is counted once
- folding leaves the endpoint alone
- folding matches the touching paths with the paths from the mirrored start one for one
- ruin is certain with nothing left
- some walk goes outside the envelope, because √n is typical and not maximal
- the distribution sums to one
- the drawn path really does touch the level
- the drawn walk's mean square displacement per step is near one in every window
- the durations satisfy their own recurrence
- the enumerated check runs at an even length between 4 and 16
- the extremes are more likely than the middle, which is the whole surprise
- the least likely outcome is an even split
- the paths ending where they end are counted by a binomial coefficient
- the player starts with something and not everything
- the position has the parity of the step count
- the quoted constant is Pólya's
- the ruin probabilities satisfy their own recurrence
- the spread of the endpoints is of the order of the square root of the steps
- the table holds between 4 and 40 units
- the three windows are whole numbers of steps
- the three windows are whole numbers of steps inside the walk
- the time spent above is always even
- the view is one the family draws
- the walk can reach its endpoint in the steps allowed
- the walk comes back to where it started at least once
- the walk has no drift
- the walk is between 400 and 60,000 steps long
- the walk starts above the level it may touch
- the walks are centred on where they started
- the win probability is a probability
Number
11 families
approx
10 kinds of claim · 5 placements
- |qα − p| comes out below 1/N
- and every convergent from the first onward breaks a record
- every record-breaking fraction is a convergent
- neighbouring convergents differ by a determinant of one
- so p/q is within one over qN of the number itself
- the constant is one this figure knows
- the largest denominator is a whole number between 8 and 200
- the number of boxes is a whole number between 3 and 14
- there are record-breaking denominators to mark
- two of the N + 1 points share a box, as they must
continued
35 kinds of claim · 14 placements
- the quotients rebuild 34/13 ×3
- the number of terms is a whole number between 2 and 12 ×2
- √2 has a convergent above √5, as Hurwitz says every irrational must
- and the first that does is the fundamental solution found by searching
- and the last of them has closed on √5
- between four and twelve terms are expanded
- between two and five constants
- D is a whole number between 2 and 40 and not a perfect square
- D is between 2 and 40
- D is not a perfect square
- D is not a perfect square, or the equation has only the trivial solution
- D names the Pell equation and is read only by the pell view; the other views take `of`
- dilations is between 2 and 6 and is read only by the dilate and ehrhart views
- e has a convergent above √5, as Hurwitz says every irrational must
- each convergent is closer than the one before
- every constant expanded is one this family knows
- every convergent stays close to the hyperbola
- neighbouring convergents differ by a determinant of one
- rs is a short list of whole heights and is read only by the reeve and ehrhart views
- some convergent solves the equation exactly
- the constant is one this figure knows
- the convergents alternate above and below the value
- the denominator is a whole number between 1 and 10000000
- the error view compares a list of constants and every other view expands one
- the expansion repeats
- the golden ratio's convergents never leave the neighbourhood of √5
- the numerator is a whole number between 1 and 10000000
- the recurrence stays in whole numbers
- the solution found satisfies the equation
- the tower's last convergent is a number
- the view is one the family draws
- there are enough convergents to draw
- π has a convergent above √5, as Hurwitz says every irrational must
- π has a convergent that beats √5 by two orders of magnitude
- φ has a convergent above √5, as Hurwitz says every irrational must
descent
11 kinds of claim · 7 placements
- the side of the big square is a whole number between 2 and 200 ×2
- the side of the small squares is a whole number between 1 and 200 ×2
- and the discrepancy never changes size
- and the new pair is strictly smaller
- every step is strictly smaller than the one before
- the descent carries the discrepancy to minus itself
- the descent runs out of room before the discrepancy runs out
- the descent takes at least three steps
- the pair is one the descent can start from
- the two small squares overlap and still reach the corners
- the two small squares, less their overlap and plus the corners, are the big one
factor
28 kinds of claim · 21 placements
- 6 is called what it is ×7
- the bar for 6 is its divisors laid end to end ×7
- the lattice draws every divisor of 30 exactly once ×5
- 496 is perfect ×2
- the number is a whole number between 4 and 100000 ×2
- and so do the norms of two and three
- between one and eight whole numbers above one
- both first splits divide the number
- both trees end in the same multiset of primes
- every divisor including the number itself adds to twice the number
- no divisor is drawn twice
- no element of this ring has norm two or three, so neither factor can split further
- the cells add up to the divisor sum
- the divisor count is the product of one more than each exponent
- the divisor sum factorises as the two row totals multiplied
- the exponent is a whole number between 2 and 7
- the first tree's leaves multiply back to the number
- the lattice half-width is a whole number between 2 and 5
- the Mersenne number for this exponent is prime
- the number has a factor tree to draw
- the number has at least three prime factors, so its trees can differ
- the number has at most three distinct primes
- the number is a product of exactly two prime powers
- the powers of two below 2^k add up to the Mersenne number
- the rectangle holds every divisor
- the second tree's leaves multiply back to the number
- the two conjugate factors have norms multiplying to 36
- the two trees start differently
ferrers
37 kinds of claim · 30 placements
- the coefficient at 0 is what the theorem says ×27
- the product's coefficient at 0 is p(0) ×19
- the two products agree at 0 ×19
- p(4) is divisible by 5 ×11
- log p(10) is below π√(2n/3), as it is for every n ×10
- the estimate at 10 is within a factor of two of the count ×10
- the ranks modulo 5 split the 30 partitions of 9 into 5 equal classes ×4
- the partitions of 8 into odd parts and into distinct parts come out equal ×3
- the number of coefficients shown is a whole number between 6 and 20 ×2
- the number sorted by rank leaves 4 on division by 5 ×2
- the number whose partitions are sorted by rank is a whole number between 4 and 14 ×2
- and changes the number of parts by exactly one
- and it is the largest one that fits
- and the estimate is closer at the far end than at the near one
- and the partitions the move cannot touch are exactly what survives
- and the ratio climbs towards that ceiling rather than away
- at least one of the divisible values is in the table
- doing it twice gives back what it started as
- every listed partition adds to the number it partitions
- the congruence drawn is the one modulo 5 or modulo 7
- the conjugate is a partition of the same number
- the largest number counted is a whole number between 20 and 120
- the largest number in the table is a whole number between 12 and 40
- the marked values are whole numbers inside the range drawn
- the move gives another partition of the same number into distinct parts
- the number being partitioned is a whole number between 3 and 12
- the number whose distinct partitions are paired off is a whole number between 3 and 14
- the numbers outside the congruence class are not all divisible either
- the partition view is one of durfee, glaisher, series, euler, pentagonal, growth, congruence
- the partitions listed are all of them
- the parts are a descending list of whole numbers
- the restricted counts are not the unrestricted one
- the series drawn is the partition product or Euler's identity
- the signed count of distinct-part partitions is the product's coefficient
- the square, the arm and the leg account for every dot
- there is a Durfee square to draw
- turning the diagram over twice gives it back
irrational
34 kinds of claim · 20 placements
- the search over divisors of 2 agrees with whether 2 is a perfect square power ×14
- the derivative of order 7 at zero is a whole number ×12
- and below 1/2 ×11
- at q = 2 the tail is positive ×11
- q! times the first 3 terms is a whole number ×11
- the degree-1 integral is positive, because the integrand is ×9
- the fraction 1/1 is no closer to √2 than 1/(3q²) allows ×9
- the largest value of the degree-1 polynomial is (π²/4)ᵏ/k! ×9
- and 4 has one such root, not several ×7
- the search over divisors of 2 agrees with whether 2 is a perfect cube power ×7
- the 1th truncation beats the exponent 2 ×5
- and it does so with room to spare: the error is below q^(−2) ×4
- some truncation beats the barrier of degree 2 ×4
- the search over divisors of 2 agrees with whether 2 is a perfect fourth power ×4
- a fraction's denominator is not zero
- and is below twice the peak, since sin integrates to two over the interval
- and it is closer than 1/q², which is what makes the exponent exactly two
- at least one of the numbers drawn has an irrational root, or the figure argues nothing
- between one and three increasing barrier degrees, none above the number of truncations drawn
- between two and five increasing degrees, each between 1 and 12
- between two and ten whole numbers, each between 2 and 64
- its denominator is a whole number between 1 and 200
- so it is strictly between 0 and 1, where no whole number is
- the fraction is at least close enough to π for the picture to be about π
- the largest denominator tried is a whole number between 3 and 14
- the number of convergents drawn is a whole number between 4 and 9
- the number of tail terms summed exactly is a whole number between 12 and 60
- the number of truncations of the constructed number is a whole number between 3 and 5
- the numerator of the fraction π is supposed to be is a whole number between 2 and 400
- the range drawn reaches a degree whose bound is below one, which is the whole argument
- the root taken is a whole number between 2 and 4
- the tail falls as the denominator grows
- the view is one the family draws
- there are derivatives to show
lattice-circle
79 kinds of claim · 47 placements
- the count on the circle of squared radius 1 is 4(d₁ − d₃) ×40
- 3, 4, 5 is a Pythagorean triple ×10
- the points on the circle of radius √25 are 4(d₁ − d₃) ×8
- the tetrahedron of height 1 has no lattice point inside it ×7
- 5 = 2² + 1² ×5
- the area is 20 interior points plus half of 7 on the edge, less one ×5
- the count at dilation 1 is the Ehrhart polynomial's value ×4
- the count at k = 1 matches the cubic fitted from the first value ×4
- the number of columns in the grid is a whole number between 4 and 8 ×2
- a group with entries only up to two fails to identify two of the classes
- a polygon's boundary count and its dual's add to twelve
- a prime is a sum of two squares exactly when it is one more than a multiple of four
- and a self-dual one has six boundary points, which is half of twelve
- and dividing by the radius itself tames it further still
- and exactly four on it, which are its own corners
- and from entries up to three onward the count stops moving
- and Scott's inequality caps the boundary count at nine
- and some attain the bound
- and stays inside three times the two-thirds power throughout
- and stays inside twice the cube root over the range drawn
- and the disc of radius two catches thirteen
- and the flat ones are excluded rather than ignored
- and the point it came from is on the unit circle
- and the rest pair off
- and they have between three and six corners
- and twelve has six
- at least two heights are drawn
- between one and five powers are drawn
- D is a whole number between 2 and 40 and not a perfect square
- D is between 2 and 40
- D is not a perfect square, or the equation has only the trivial solution
- every edge lies at lattice distance one from the interior point
- every lattice triangle in the grid satisfies the identity
- every marked point really is on the circle
- every one of the 2300 triples of grid points was reached
- every power is again a solution
- every solution up to the largest drawn is a power of the smallest
- for some height the linear coefficient is negative, so it counts nothing
- four of the sixteen are their own dual
- n names one circle and is read only by the default view; the other views take their own parameters
- no polygon with an interior point has more boundary points than Scott allows
- no two slopes give the same triple
- one extra for the hole repairs it, which is the Euler characteristic in disguise
- one has one divisor
- one of them attains Scott's bound
- Pick's formula with one interior point makes twice the area the boundary count
- Pick's theorem holds for every polygon swept
- some circles miss the lattice entirely, which is the whole question
- the bound is attained only at one interior point
- the box the polygons are drawn from is a whole number between 3 and 4
- the circle of squared radius one carries four points
- the disc of radius one catches five points
- the divisors of everything up to six add to fourteen
- the dual of one of the sixteen is another of the sixteen
- the error divided by the cube root is the tamer ratio
- the error divided by the two-thirds power is the tamer ratio
- the error is not bounded by twice the square root over this range
- the identity as stated gives the wrong area for a region with a hole
- the largest bound counted is a whole number between 200 and 4000
- the largest prime to test is a whole number between 10 and 200
- the largest radius counted is a whole number between 40 and 400
- the largest squared radius drawn is a whole number between 12 and 64
- the lattice half-width is a whole number between 1 and 16
- the leading coefficient is the volume for every height drawn
- the number is a whole number between 1 and 200
- the polygon has between 3 and 16 whole-numbered corners and some area
- the polygon is one of blob, triangle, comb, thin
- the second differences are twice the area
- the slopes are proper positive fractions
- the solution found satisfies the equation
- the sweep found a substantial family
- the sweep grid is between 3 and 6 points across
- the view is one the family draws
- the volumes differ while the counts do not
- there are sixteen classes to pair up
- there are sixteen lattice polygons with a single interior point
- twice the area is a whole number, which is why halves are the only fractions in the formula
- upTo names a range and is read only by the gaussian and count views
- while a polygon with no interior point can exceed the bound, which is why it needs one
mediant
45 kinds of claim · 24 placements
- 7/2 is in lowest terms ×108
- the circles on 0/1 and 1/7 touch ×56
- s(1) and s(2) are coprime ×48
- the 1th ratio's numerator agrees with the Calkin–Wilf walk ×48
- the ratio 1/1 appears once ×48
- 0/1 and 1/7 are Farey neighbours ×24
- 1/1 arrives already in lowest terms ×15
- and its mediant 1/1 is already in lowest terms ×13
- s(2) counts the hyperbinary representations of 1 ×12
- the sequence has one entry per coprime pair up to 7 ×2
- and at most its right bound
- and is closer to the target
- and its denominator does too
- and the path closes on the target
- circles that are not neighbours stay clear of each other
- each path is a word of at most eight L's and R's
- each record has a larger denominator than the last
- how many terms are drawn is a whole number between 8 and 64
- how many turns are taken is a whole number between 6 and 34
- no fraction is produced twice
- no two words produce the same matrix, so the tree never rejoins
- reading the drawing left to right reads the fractions in increasing order
- the depth is a whole number between 2 and 5
- the descent passes at least three fractions within 1/q² of the target
- the descent produces several record approximations
- the drawing scale is a whole number between 200 and 400
- the matrix for "L" has determinant ±1
- the matrix for "LR" has determinant ±1
- the matrix for "LRL" has determinant ±1
- the matrix for "LRLR" has determinant ±1
- the matrix for "LRLRL" has determinant ±1
- the matrix for "R" has determinant ±1
- the matrix for "RL" has determinant ±1
- the matrix for "RLR" has determinant ±1
- the matrix for "RLRR" has determinant ±1
- the matrix for "RR" has determinant ±1
- the matrix for "RRL" has determinant ±1
- the matrix for "RRLR" has determinant ±1
- the matrix for "the root" has determinant ±1
- the mediant is at least its left bound
- the mode of the mediant family is one of tree, farey, ford, matrices, diatomic, approx
- the order is a whole number between 2 and 12
- the target is one of phi, root2, pi, e
- the tree is full to its stated depth
- up to which index the hyperbinary count is checked is a whole number between 4 and 24
necklace
13 kinds of claim · 9 placements
- the length is a whole number between 3 and 7 ×2
- the number of colours is a whole number between 2 and 4 ×2
- and exactly a of them are single
- and the number of non-constant classes is (a^p − a)/p
- every class is a single string or a full ring of p
- every other class holds exactly p strings
- every string of the given length is drawn
- p divides a^p − a, which is what the count just showed
- the classes account for every string
- the classes of size one are exactly the constant strings
- the figure draws every string, so there is a ceiling on how many
- the length is prime
- the length is prime — the whole argument needs it to be
reciprocity
45 kinds of claim · 21 placements
- two primes agree modulo 3 and disagree about x² + 27y² ×158
- 3 is represented by x² + 1y² exactly when 3 mod 4 is one of the classes ×134
- every step is a whole unit, because 1 is not a multiple of 13 ×70
- the sign of multiplication by 3 is (3 | 11) ×22
- (−1 | 3) is decided by 3 mod 4 ×17
- (2 | 3) is decided by 3 mod 8 ×17
- Gauss's lemma counts 1 folds for −1, and its parity is the symbol ×17
- Gauss's lemma counts 1 folds for 2, and its parity is the symbol ×14
- the modulus deciding x² + 1y² is at most 4n ×3
- the modulus is a whole number between 5 and 31 ×3
- 3 folds gives the same answer as Euler's criterion ×2
- (p | q) comes out of the count above it
- (q | p) comes out of the count below the line
- a prime with both symbols positive is 1 modulo 8, which is the two conditions met at once
- and every one of them lands in the bottom half
- and exactly half the multipliers are squares
- and it has no imaginary part
- and points up, which is the part Gauss took four years over
- and positive, which is the part Gauss took four years over
- and their product is minus one to the power of the whole rectangle
- between two and five forms are drawn
- both are odd primes and they are different
- each form's coefficient is a whole number between 1 and 27
- every moved cycle has the same length, which is the order of the multiplier
- every point is counted exactly once, on one side or the other
- for a prime 1 modulo 4 the sum is real
- for a prime 3 modulo 4 the sum is purely imaginary
- no lattice point lies on the diagonal, because the primes are coprime
- the bound the congruence check runs to is a whole number between 2000 and 40000
- the cycle count and the inversion count give the same sign
- the drawing holds both kinds of form, which is what it is for
- the first prime is a whole number between 3 and 31
- the folded values are all different
- the folds for 2 are the k above p/4
- the largest modulus tried is a whole number between 20 and 400
- the largest prime drawn is a whole number between 60 and 400
- the largest prime in the table is a whole number between 11 and 97
- the length of the sum, squared, is the modulus
- the modulus is an odd prime
- the multiplier is a whole number between 2 and 30
- the multiplier is not a multiple of the modulus
- the points below the line are the sum of the floors of kq/p
- the second prime is a whole number between 3 and 31
- the square of the sum is plus or minus the modulus
- the view is one the family draws
sieve
73 kinds of claim · 55 placements
- the class 0 shares a factor with 4, so it can hold at most the factor itself ×20
- 211 leaves remainder 1 on division by 2 ×10
- the limit is a whole number between 10 and 400 ×5
- 2 classes share no factor with 4 ×4
- the staircase ends at π(3000) ×4
- every listed prime is already in the class 3 mod 4 ×2
- so some prime factor of it is 3 mod 4 — the classes multiply, and a product of ones is one ×2
- the class 3 leads at almost every bound ×2
- the modulus is a whole number between 3 and 14 ×2
- the number built is 3 mod 4 ×2
- a Mersenne prime has a prime exponent
- a square left unstruck holds a prime, and a struck one does not
- an even truncation is an upper bound
- and 168 below a thousand
- and an odd one a lower bound
- and every combination of exponents appears once
- and it tracks the logarithm of a logarithm to within a twelfth throughout
- and modulo three it never falls behind over this range
- and over the last decade of the range the diverging sum gains more than twice as much
- and some of the lower bounds are negative, which is no bound at all
- and the first bound at which it does not is 26,861
- and the number of them in the interval is never far below n / ln n
- and the one prime it holds divides the modulus
- and the ratio to x / ln x comes down as x grows
- and the twin pairs track theirs
- and there are almost none of them in this range
- and they hold them in near-equal numbers, which is more than Dirichlet's theorem claims
- between two and five odd primes are listed
- both classes hold primes below the bound
- each is near the share an even split would give
- every class coprime to the modulus holds primes
- every interval from n to 2n holds a prime
- every prime below the bound lands in exactly one class
- every prime factor of one more than a square of an even number is 1 mod 4
- every prime factor of the constructed number is outside the list
- multiplying the factors out gives exactly the sum over the numbers they build
- no listed prime divides it
- one gap between each consecutive pair
- the bound the postulate is checked to is a whole number between 100 and 50000
- the column count is a whole number between 4 and 25
- the construction is the one that subtracts or the one that squares
- the count runs above x / ln x over this range
- the factorisation multiplies back to the number built
- the factors are between 2 and 4 primes
- the full inclusion-exclusion agrees with the count made by sifting
- the gaps add up to the distance from 2 to the last prime
- the grid of whole numbers drawn is a whole number between 24 and 144
- the largest bound counted is a whole number between 5000 and 200000
- the largest number sieved is a whole number between 100000 and 2000000
- the largest prime sifted by is a whole number between 11 and 43
- the list is between two and six primes
- the logarithmic integral runs above the count at every checkpoint drawn
- the marked checkpoints are whole numbers inside the range
- the number built stays inside exact arithmetic
- the number of intervals drawn is a whole number between 6 and 40
- the numbers marked are exactly those the product builds
- the partial sums swing far past the answer before settling
- the pass number is between 0 and 8
- the power each factor is truncated at is a whole number between 2 and 5
- the primes 1 mod 4 are about half of all of them
- the primes one more than a square track the conjectured count
- the race is drawn modulo three or four
- the range sifted is a whole number between 10000 and 1000000
- the range the sum over primes is drawn to is a whole number between 1000 and 1000000
- the sieve found every prime below the bound
- the squares left standing below 100 are the primes
- the sum of the reciprocals of the primes keeps growing
- the sum over all primes has passed 2.8 and is still climbing
- the view is one the family draws
- there are 25 primes below 100
- while the ratio to the logarithmic integral is nearer one by more than a factor of four
- while the sum over the twins is still under 1.8
- π(x) stays above x / ln x throughout this range
Dynamics
11 families
attractor
32 kinds of claim · 31 placements
- above the critical parameter the trajectory visits both lobes
- and each is narrower by the stretch factor
- and even at the cusp, where a straight line cannot fit, the departure stays small
- and it is the Lorenz system's own exponent, near nine tenths
- and settles on neither fixed point
- and the strips are laid out in order without overlapping
- areas shrink at every step
- below the critical parameter it spirals into a fixed point
- between two and four starting gaps, each a whole power of ten from −2 to −12
- enough returns to see a shape
- every surviving strip lies inside the square
- every window still holds some of the orbit
- so the total width falls, and the limit has none
- the closed-form fixed points really are fixed
- the contraction is between 0.1 and 0.4
- the geometric parameter is between 0.1 and 8
- the growth rate does not depend on how close the two starts were
- the Hénon parameter is between 1 and 1.45
- the Jacobian determinant is the contraction
- the map's maximum is in its interior, so it folds
- the number of magnifications is a whole number between 1 and 4
- the number of stages is a whole number between 2 and 5
- the number of steps is a whole number between 500 and 40000
- the orbit stays bounded, which is what makes it an attractor
- the Prandtl parameter is between 0.1 and 40
- the Rayleigh parameter is between 0.1 and 100
- the return map is a curve, not a cloud — its typical thickness is under one per cent of its range
- the step size is between 0.0005 and 0.05
- the stretching factor is between 2.2 and 5
- the strips double at every stage
- the surviving set has a dimension between nought and one
- the trajectory stays in a bounded region
automaton
6 kinds of claim · 13 placements
- rule 90 row 0 matches Pascal's triangle mod 2 ×40
- every cell is on or off and nothing else
- the drawn table reads back as the rule number
- the number of rows is a whole number between 4 and 160
- the rule number is a whole number between 0 and 255
- the seed is single or random
basins
6 kinds of claim · 6 placements
- a point beside root 1 runs to root 1 ×3
- each root cubes to one
- the iteration cap is a whole number between 8 and 200
- the sample count is a whole number between 60 and 700
- the span is between 0.02 and 6
- with no imaginary part left over
bifurcation
10 kinds of claim · 13 placements
- the orbit at r = 2.8 has period 1 ×4
- the column count is a whole number between 40 and 1400
- the diagram is drawn as marks rather than as a bitmap of elements
- the doublings come in order
- the last ratio measured is Feigenbaum's constant to within a twentieth
- the lower parameter is between 0 and 4
- the number of doublings is a whole number between 3 and 5
- the points kept per column is a whole number between 10 and 400
- the range runs upward and is wide enough to draw
- the upper parameter is between 0 and 4
billiard
64 kinds of claim · 29 placements
- a trajectory in this table takes exactly 4 directions and no more ×3
- the path bounces correctly off side 1 ×3
- a closed path is one that returns to within a tolerance
- a path closing on itself was found within 1e-9 — the search at this depth found none otherwise
- and arrives and leaves at the same angle to the radius
- and does so after twice the sum of the two whole numbers
- and its angles add to a straight angle
- and its invariant is the same at every bounce
- and never returns exactly to where it started
- and no nearby triangle inscribed in the same three sides is shorter
- and that genus is a whole number
- and the direction along the wall is untouched
- and the path does not close before it is supposed to
- and with the obstacle the gap grows by far more than the distance does
- at the value it was aimed with
- between 10 and 200 bounces
- between 20 and 200 bounces are followed
- between 3 and 24 bounces are drawn
- between 3 and 40 chords are drawn
- each altitude meets its side between the corners
- every chord passes the same distance from the centre
- in both coordinates
- on the empty table the gap grows no faster than the distance travelled
- on the empty table the gap stays proportional to the distance travelled
- so no part of it is below the axis
- the angle of arrival equals the angle of departure at every wall
- the angles of the table add to what a polygon's angles must
- the ball is moving and has a wall to reach
- the ball starts inside the table
- the bouncing path and the folded straight line agree everywhere along their length
- the drawn triangle has the angles it was asked for
- the escaping trajectory's invariant is below it
- the first hit is somewhere on the rim
- the irrational path enters nearly every cell of the grid
- the irrational path is followed for between 60 and 600 bounces
- the obstacle fits inside the table with room to pass
- the path is followed for a drawable number of bounces
- the rational slope is a ratio of small whole numbers
- the rational slope is in lowest terms
- the rational slope's path returns to its exact starting state
- the reflected copies drawn fit inside the panel they are drawn in
- the search runs to between three and sixteen bounces
- the slope is drawable
- the star closes exactly
- the star polygon is drawn in a single closed loop
- the star wraps between 1 and 6 times
- the stem is between a fifth and a whole radius deep
- the stem is between a twelfth and half the cap wide
- the surface the table unfolds into has a whole genus
- the sweep is a grid of a workable size
- the sweep produced something to compare
- the table is a triangle
- the table is one the family knows
- the trajectory is followed for between 40 and 600 bounces
- the trajectory stayed inside the table
- the trapped trajectory never touches a stem wall
- the trapped trajectory's invariant is above the stem's half-width and inside the cap
- the triangle is acute, which is when this path exists
- the two invariants sit on opposite sides of the stem's half-width
- the two paths start very nearly together
- the view is one the family draws
- two angles of a triangle, in degrees, leaving a third
- while the trajectory aimed under the half-width does go down the stem
- with the obstacle the same two paths end up hundreds of times further apart
boxcount
41 kinds of claim · 23 placements
- at depth 2 the cover's total agrees with the closed form at exponent 1.037 ×36
- after 0 steps there are two to the power 0 pieces ×7
- at the dimension itself the total is exactly one, at depth 2 ×6
- after 6 steps there are as many pieces as the rule makes ×2
- a smaller box never covers the set in fewer boxes
- and above it the total shrinks to nought
- below the dimension the total grows without bound as the cover is refined
- between 20 and 400 thousand steps
- between one and four sets this family draws
- between two and six depths, each between 1 and 14
- each count is exactly the number of pieces at that depth
- how many box sizes are counted is a whole number between 3 and 6
- how many times the box size is divided is a whole number between 1 and 5
- how many times the rule is applied is a whole number between 2 and 6
- the chosen cells are distinct positions of the grid
- the contraction beats the stretch, so the formula's first case applies
- the counted box dimension closes on the closed form
- the counted dimension closes on the one the rule forces
- the counted dimension lies strictly between a curve's and a region's
- the curve is drawn finer than the smallest box counted
- the drawn boxes are the counted boxes
- the exponent is swept between 0.05 and 1 either side of the dimension
- the first exponent is positive, which is what makes the orbit sensitive to its start
- the formula returns a value between a curve's dimension and a region's
- the Hausdorff dimension never exceeds the box dimension
- the horizontal contraction is the stronger one, which is what makes the carpet self-affine
- the map contracts area but does not collapse it
- the map's parameter is in the range that has an attractor
- the number of columns is a whole number between 2 and 6
- the number of pieces and the ratio give the dimension the rule forces
- the number of rows is a whole number between 2 and 5
- the number of times the rule is applied is a whole number between 1 and 7
- the orbit stays on the attractor rather than escaping
- the rows carry different numbers of cells, so the two dimensions differ
- the rows carry equal numbers, so the two dimensions agree
- the sample is finer than the smallest box counted
- the second is negative, which is what collapses the attractor onto a set of no area
- the set is one built by a rule, or there is no exponent to pivot about
- the set is one this family draws
- the two exponents add to the logarithm of the area factor, which the map fixes
- the view is one the family draws
circle-map
40 kinds of claim · 24 placements
- the nonlinearity is between 0.4 and 1.2 ×2
- and both boundary circles still stay where they are
- and the reason is that this map does not preserve area
- and the second really is outside it
- and they turn in opposite directions
- both boundary circles stay where they are
- each crossing is a fixed point of the map
- each orbit is followed for between 60 and 600 steps
- inside a plateau the rotation number does not depend on where the orbit started
- no orbit leaves the annulus
- no point of the annulus comes near to staying where it is
- one fixed point is a centre and the other a saddle
- the angle is a number or one of the named constants
- the angular shift changes sign across the annulus at every angle
- the boundaries still turn in opposite directions
- the conserved quantity stays put along every orbit drawn
- the first parameter really is inside the plateau
- the gaps take at most three distinct values, as the three-distance theorem says
- the largest nonlinearity is between 0.4 and 1.2
- the locked share of the parameter axis grows with the nonlinearity
- the loop and its image cross exactly twice
- the loop and its image enclose the same area
- the lower parameter is between 0 and 1
- the map locks onto one step in two over an interval of parameters
- the map preserves area everywhere on the annulus
- the measured curve is flat over a stretch at more than one rational
- the number of nonlinearity levels is a whole number between 6 and 40
- the number of parameters per level is a whole number between 40 and 320
- the number of parameters sampled is a whole number between 60 and 900
- the number of steps drawn is a whole number between 10 and 60
- the number of steps is a whole number between 3 and 120
- the orbit repeats exactly when the angle is rational
- the outward push is a sensible size
- the perturbation is a sensible size
- the perturbation is between a fiftieth and two fifths
- the rotation number never falls as the parameter rises
- the upper parameter is between 0 and 1
- the view is one the family draws
- the window runs upward and is wide enough to draw
- with no nonlinearity the curve is a straight line and has no plateaus to speak of
cobweb
76 kinds of claim · 49 placements
- bin 1 holds the share the density says it should ×60
- every point over 1 comes back after 1 doublings ×6
- 0.00000 returns to itself after 2 steps ×5
- a full two-branch fold has 2^1 points fixed by its 1th power ×5
- both maps have the same number of points of period dividing 1 ×5
- 0.6154 is fixed at r = 2.6 ×4
- the number of steps is a whole number between 2 and 400 ×4
- the numerator of the starting point is a whole number between 1 and 10000000 ×3
- at r = 2.4 the error shrinks by the slope at the fixed point each step ×2
- the number of steps drawn is a whole number between 3 and 20 ×2
- the orbit at r = 2.4 converges far enough to measure a rate ×2
- the parameter is between 0 and 2 ×2
- √2 is fixed by the Newton step
- a new crossing has a period above one that divides 2
- after the computed orbit is dead the exact one is still moving
- and carries the right end to the right end
- and it never reaches zero, because an odd denominator cannot be halved away
- and never grows
- and shrinks every distance by a factor under one
- and stays there, because zero is fixed
- and the constant the ratio approaches is 1/(2√2)
- and the repeat found really is a repeat
- and then separate visibly, at a step the figure marks
- between 6 and 60 steps are taken
- between one and three logistic parameters, each with an attracting fixed point
- each letter of the itinerary is the next binary place of the starting point
- each Newton error is the square of the last over twice the current guess
- every bin is visited
- every corner of the staircase lies on the curve or on the diagonal
- every crossing of the map is also a crossing of the composed map
- every exact iterate is a whole numerator over the same denominator
- every start reaches the same point
- five Newton steps from 1.9 reach twelve decimal places
- how many steps of the orbit are drawn is a whole number between 3 and 12
- its denominator is a whole number between 3 and 10000000
- one point drawn per step, and the start
- the 2 new crossings of period 2 are whole orbits of 2 points
- the average of one long orbit is the average over the whole interval
- the change of coordinate fixes the left end
- the change of coordinate is increasing, so it is reversible
- the computed orbit reaches exactly zero inside the drawn window, having run out of binary places
- the contraction is one the family knows
- the coordinate change carries the tent map to the logistic map
- the coordinate is one whose invariant density this figure knows
- the denominator is odd, or the exact orbit reaches zero as surely as the float one does
- the error after n steps is inside k to the n times the error at the start
- the exact orbit closes up inside the drawn window
- the exact shares add to one
- the fixed point attracts, so there is a rate to measure
- the longest cycle counted is a whole number between 2 and 8
- the longest word counted is a whole number between 2 and 8
- the longest word counted is between two and eight
- the map is one the family knows
- the map is one this figure knows
- the map itself has a fixed point
- the map sends the interval into itself
- the number of binary places the starting point has is a whole number between 3 and 8
- the number of bins is a whole number between 8 and 80
- the number of drawn steps is a whole number between 2 and 400
- the number of times the map is composed is a whole number between 2 and 4
- the orbit approaches the fixed point exactly when the slope is shallow
- the orbit stays inside the unit interval
- the point a repeating word names has that word as its itinerary
- the point found by bisection is fixed
- the quadratic curve is on or off
- the slope at the fixed point is 2 − r
- the starting point has between three and eight binary places
- the starting point is between 0 and 1
- the starting point is inside the interval
- the transported orbit is the orbit of the transported point
- the transported orbit obeys the tent map's own recurrence
- the two agree exactly for at least eight steps
- the view is one the family draws
- the words of each length and the points of that period are equally many
- two logistic parameters above one
- two points are at most k times as far apart after the map as before
collatz
44 kinds of claim · 30 placements
- step 1 follows the rule ×178
- every one of the 2 patterns of length 1 occurs exactly once ×12
- the orbit of 27 reaches one ×7
- a power of two is never a power of three
- a starting number is a whole number between 3 and 1000000
- across a large sample of starts, half the steps are odd ones
- and 27 is the famous long one
- and by the largest run drawn it is above nine tenths
- and it is the one at one
- and no two residues give the same parity string
- and reaches a few thousandths within the range drawn
- and the average fall per step is the value the pairing predicts
- at least one pattern gives a whole number
- between two and four odd offsets, each at most eleven
- each convergent beats every fraction with a smaller denominator
- every number the reverse tree reaches does come back to one
- every orbit trends downwards in the logarithm
- every pattern of the length was solved
- most parity strings shrink the number by the end of the run
- no pattern with a negative denominator gives a positive whole solution
- one is already at one
- one length per start
- so the residues and the parity strings match one for one
- the continued fraction of log₂3 starts 1, 1, 1, 2
- the denominator is always odd, so the solution stays where the map is defined
- the depth of the tree is a whole number between 3 and 12
- the largest number of steps is a whole number between 4 and 15
- the largest start is a whole number between 20 and 4000
- the longest pattern length checked is a whole number between 6 and 14
- the longest pattern searched is a whole number between 8 and 20
- the map is a bijection at every length checked
- the multiplier condition predicts the drop, on a large member of the class
- the number of convergents listed is a whole number between 5 and 10
- the number of steps is a whole number between 3 and 7
- the ordinary rule has exactly one cycle at these lengths
- the ordinary rule is among those searched
- the parity of the first steps depends only on the start modulo two to the k
- the pattern length is a whole number between 4 and 10
- the relative gap shrinks along the list
- the rule with minus one has at least three, which no drift argument distinguishes
- the share provably driven down grows with the number of steps allowed
- the starting number is a whole number between 1 and 100000
- the tree is still growing at the depth drawn
- the view is one the family draws
complex-set
11 kinds of claim · 12 placements
- and neither is four tenths
- and so is minus one
- one is not
- the critical point is in this Julia set exactly when its parameter is in the Mandelbrot set
- the escape time separates into bands
- the iteration cap is a whole number between 20 and 400
- the Julia parameter is a complex number
- the sample count is a whole number between 60 and 700
- the set is the Mandelbrot set or a Julia set
- the span is between 0.0005 and 4
- zero is in the Mandelbrot set
divergence
12 kinds of claim · 13 placements
- and below the onset of chaos it is negative
- at r = 4 the exponent is log 2, which is exactly computable
- the column count is a whole number between 40 and 1200
- the lower parameter is between 0 and 4
- the number of steps is a whole number between 10 and 200
- the orbits separate exactly when the parameter is past the onset of chaos
- the parameter is between 0 and 4
- the range runs upward and is wide enough to draw
- the starting point is between 0 and 1
- the two orbits begin the stated distance apart
- the two starts are close together
- the upper parameter is between 0 and 4
Logic
15 families
chains
20 kinds of claim · 13 placements
- a choice from each of the pairs is one of two to the power of their number
- between two and five pairs, each of two named things
- each element belongs to exactly one chain
- every moved point lands strictly inside the open interval
- every point the map has to reach is reached
- no two moved points land on the same place
- the assembled map sends no two elements to the same place
- the left-to-right map sends different elements to different places
- the left-to-right shift is a whole number between 1 and 4
- the members of a pair are named apart exactly when an order is claimed
- the number of elements drawn from each side is a whole number between 5 and 14
- the number of sequence terms drawn is a whole number between 4 and 12
- the pairs either carry an order or they do not
- the right-to-left map sends different elements to different places
- the right-to-left shift is a whole number between 1 and 4
- the rule fits two to the power of the pairs it cannot tell apart
- the rule names exactly one of the rows exactly when the pairs carry an order
- the two maps are different, or there are no chains to see
- the view is one the family draws
- the window shows at least three chains
connectives
8 kinds of claim · 7 placements
- between one and five bases are compared
- between two and eight connectives are tabulated
- no two of the sixteen have the same table
- Post's criterion and the closure agree about whether a connective is complete on its own
- the closure and Post's criterion agree about this basis
- the connective is one of the sixteen
- the number of columns is a whole number between 4 and 8
- there are sixteen binary connectives and no more
disc-model
14 kinds of claim · 9 placements
- a line drawn as parallel was checked and does not meet the base line inside the disc
- a triangle has three vertices
- each crossing point was computed and lies on both lines
- every angle of the triangle is positive
- every geodesic arc meets the boundary circle at a right angle
- every vertex is inside the disc
- exactly one of the lines through the point never meets the base line
- more than one geodesic through the point misses the base line
- the angles of a triangle in this model add to less than a straight angle
- the defect is a positive area
- the number of lines tried through the point is a whole number between 3 and 9
- the number of parallels drawn is a whole number between 1 and 9
- the outside point is inside the disc
- the point is off the base geodesic
ef-game
67 kinds of claim · 31 placements
- at 1 rounds the search agrees with the rule that says same length or both at least 1 ×3
- at depth 1 the words must be 1 letters before Duplicator survives ×3
- by the largest size drawn, Duplicator survives 2 rounds on every pair sampled ×2
- Duplicator survives 3 rounds on a cycle of 22 against two of 11 ×2
- the search agrees with the rule that says Duplicator survives 3 rounds from 5 points up ×2
- a star splits at the first round
- an even number of edges is a coin toss at every size, as the flip bijection says it must be
- and does not at the smallest
- and does not survive the three-pebble one
- and Duplicator survives at every length past it
- and it does grow
- and once Duplicator survives at one length it survives at every longer one
- and so do two triangles, which is why refinement cannot separate them
- and that object is a path
- and the group has order two
- and the share rises with the size rather than wandering
- and the two graphs have the same number of edges
- at every depth there is a length past which the two words cannot be separated
- between fifty and four hundred graphs at each size
- between four and twelve pairs of graphs at each size
- between ten and eighty graphs are sampled at each size
- between three and six graph sizes, each of four to sixty points
- between three and six rounds shown
- between three and six sizes, each of four to forty-four points
- between three and six sizes, each of three to forty points
- between two and four depths
- between two and three round counts are tabulated
- Duplicator survives the two-pebble bijective game
- every point of both graphs has two neighbours
- exactly half of the 64 graphs on 4 points have an even number of edges
- large ones almost never do
- one graph is connected and the other is not, so a sentence separating them would express connectedness
- one or two round counts, each of at most three
- one-dimensional refinement gives both graphs the same colours and cannot tell them apart
- small graphs usually fail the property
- so the count grows like a logarithm rather than like the length
- the cycle stays one colour at every round, since every point looks alike
- the deeper game needs a larger graph before Duplicator always survives it
- the depth is between one and three
- the first-order property "every pair has a common neighbour" has settled on 1 by the largest size drawn
- the first-order property "some point joined to nothing" has settled on 0 by the largest size drawn
- the first-order property "three points all joined" has settled on 1 by the largest size drawn
- the game agrees with the neighbourhood argument about who wins
- the game is played to at most three rounds, which is as far as a search finishes
- the game runs between one and four rounds
- the measured share agrees with the count of expected failures
- the number of colours never falls
- the number of rounds Spoiler needs is computed
- the other two monoids are aperiodic, so both languages are first-order definable
- the parity language's monoid contains a non-trivial group, so no first-order sentence says it
- the rounds needed against a chain one longer follow the logarithm of its length
- the sizes are listed in increasing order
- the sweep runs over between three and eight cycle lengths
- the sweep runs to between five and nine
- the table runs to between four and nine
- the transcript ends the way the exhaustive search says the game ends
- the two cycles are of different lengths
- the two cycles have three points each
- the two graphs have the same number of points and the same number of edges
- the two neighbourhoods are the same object, computed from the cycles rather than named
- the two small cycles run to between three and thirteen points
- the view is one the family draws
- two chains of between two and nine elements
- two cycles of between five and thirty points
- two-dimensional refinement does tell them apart
- words up to between four and six letters
- words up to between six and twelve letters
infinite
32 kinds of claim · 22 placements
- a set of 0 has more subsets than members ×13
- height 2 holds finitely many polynomials, and the enumeration produced them ×5
- −1 is among the roots the enumeration found
- √2 is among the roots the enumeration found
- 1 is among the roots the enumeration found
- a half is among the roots the enumeration found
- a larger height admits more polynomials
- all 512 listings of 3 subsets of a set of 3 were tried
- and the second
- and yet the two images are far apart, so the weave is not continuous
- by a factor of more than a thousand at this many places
- every fraction the grid reaches is on the list
- every kept cell got exactly one place in the list
- no fraction is listed twice
- the complemented diagonal is on no row of the listing
- the digit strings are as long as the drawing says
- the first number's digits are between four and ten decimal places
- the golden ratio is among the roots the enumeration found
- the largest height enumerated is a whole number between 3 and 6
- the largest sum of numerator and denominator drawn is a whole number between 3 and 9
- the number of places drawn is a whole number between 4 and 10
- the number of rungs drawn is a whole number between 3 and 5
- the places run from one with no gaps
- the second number has the same number of places
- the size at which every listing is tried is a whole number between 2 and 3
- the two expansions differ by less than one unit in the last place drawn
- the view is one the family draws
- the walk's count and the sum of totients agree, having been computed independently
- the window holds enough of them to draw
- the window on the line is between one and twelve wide
- the woven number has one place from each, alternately
- unweaving recovers the first number
karnaugh
12 kinds of claim · 9 placements
- consecutive entries of the Gray code differ in exactly one bit
- every cell of a prime implicant is one the function makes true
- every leaf of the formula is a variable
- every opening bracket in the formula is closed
- squares next to each other on the map differ in one variable
- the covering rectangles and the formula agree on every assignment
- the formula and its disjunctive normal form agree on every row
- the formula has between one and five variables
- the formula is a non-empty string
- the map is drawn for three or four variables
- the table has one row per assignment
- the whole formula is consumed by the parser
kripke
72 kinds of claim · 40 placements
- □□p → □p is valid exactly on the dense frames
- □p → □□p is valid exactly on the transitive frames
- □p → ◇p is valid exactly on the serial frames
- □p → p is valid exactly on the reflexive frames
- □p at a world is p at every world it can reach
- ◇□p → □◇p is valid exactly on the confluent frames
- ◇p → □◇p is valid exactly on the euclidean frames
- ◇p at a world is p at some world it can reach
- 4 is valid on a frame exactly when the frame is transitive
- 5 is valid on a frame exactly when the frame is euclidean
- a formula separating the other pair exists among those searched
- a transitive model filters to a transitive quotient here, checked rather than assumed
- a world and a valuation were found at which the axiom fails
- a world that reaches nowhere makes every necessity true and every possibility false
- and fewer worlds than the model it came from
- and it is deeper than anything the closure could ask
- and no frame with any worlds in it validates both Löb's axiom and □p → p
- and on every one of them ¬□⊥ is a fixed point of ¬□p
- and some class of the quotient can — the collapse invents a way back that the model has none of
- and the other two starting worlds are not
- and two frames agreeing on all of them disagree about the axiom
- and validates what is valid
- B is valid on a frame exactly when the frame is symmetric
- between one and five axioms are tabulated
- between two and six frames are compared
- D is valid on a frame exactly when the frame is serial
- excluded middle at a stage is exactly p there or ¬p there
- formulas up to depth two to four are compared
- Löb's axiom is valid exactly on the transitive frames with no cycles
- no condition in the catalogue matches McKinsey's axiom
- no stage forces both p and its negation
- no world of the model can be returned to
- on a frame with the property the axiom holds everywhere, under every valuation
- on that frame every deeper modality agrees with the first, not only the second
- one of the two frames collapses the tower and the other does not
- p → □◇p is valid exactly on the symmetric frames
- so every frame of the logic is transitive, which Löb's axiom implies
- some depth of looking ahead separates the chain from its quotient
- some frame this family knows has the property
- some frames validate it
- some stage forces neither p nor its negation, so p ∨ ¬p fails there
- T is valid on a frame exactly when the frame is reflexive
- the axiom is one of the five
- the bisimilar worlds agree on every formula up to the drawn depth
- the chain runs between eight and twenty-four worlds
- the deeper closure is asked for or not
- the frame is one this figure knows
- the gallery's verdict for a branch, both ends dead is the sweep's
- the gallery's verdict for a single dead end is the sweep's
- the gallery's verdict for a transitive chain is the sweep's
- the gallery's verdict for a two-cycle is the sweep's
- the gallery's verdict for a world seeing itself is the sweep's
- the gallery's verdict for one step and stop is the sweep's
- the model is the chain or the strict order on its worlds
- the model refutes □p → p, which is not valid in this logic
- the quotient has at most one world for each way of answering the closure
- the sweep runs over frames on three or four worlds
- the tower is followed to between two and four boxes
- the truth lemma holds for □□p: it is true at a world exactly when it is true at that world's class
- the truth lemma holds for □p: it is true at a world exactly when it is true at that world's class
- the truth lemma holds for p: it is true at a world exactly when it is true at that world's class
- the truth lemma holds: □□p is true exactly where it is accepted
- the truth lemma holds: □p is true exactly where it is accepted
- the truth lemma holds: p is true exactly where it is accepted
- the two starting worlds are related by the bisimulation
- the view is one the family draws
- this frame is not reflexive, so the axiom has a chance of failing
- this frame is not symmetric, so the axiom has a chance of failing
- this frame is not transitive, so the axiom has a chance of failing
- two frames this family knows
- what is established at a stage stays established later
- worlds share a class exactly when no formula of the closure tells them apart
lattice
55 kinds of claim · 42 placements
- the size of the underlying set is a whole number between 2 and 4 ×3
- a cyclic order has exactly n arcs of length k
- an element's share of the maximal chains is one over its layer's size
- and a star is a family of that size
- and every chain meets the middle layer exactly once
- and every one of them is a whole layer
- and every two of its members really do meet
- and everything sits below something maximal
- and some antichain's shares add to exactly one
- and takes one step of size at each rank between its ends
- at most k of the n arcs pairwise meet, and k of them do
- each chain is symmetric about the middle of the cube
- each chain runs upward in the order
- each named target is a subset index is a whole number between 0 and 7
- each step adds exactly one element
- each subset is joined to the ones one element larger
- every chain has an upper bound inside the order
- every element of the order is on some chain
- every relation of the order is respected by every extension
- every subset is on exactly one chain
- exactly n + 1 antichains use the chains up exactly
- no antichain's shares add to more than one
- no chain meets the antichain twice
- no element is on two chains
- no element is sent to the built set
- no subset is on two chains
- no two elements of one layer are comparable
- so there is something maximal
- some incomparable pair splits the extensions between a third and two thirds
- the built set disagrees with f(k) about whether k belongs
- the chain count is the elements less the matched pairs
- the extensions enumerated and the extensions counted by peeling agree
- the fewest chains covering the order is the size of the largest antichain
- the largest antichain is at least as large as the widest layer
- the largest family in which every two sets meet is as large as a star
- the map names one subset per element
- the number has between four and sixteen divisors
- the number has between four and sixteen proper divisors
- the number of chains is the size of the middle layer
- the number of subsets is two to the power of the set's size
- the number whose divisors are ordered is a whole number between 4 and 210
- the number whose divisors are ordered is between 4 and 210
- the number whose proper divisors are ordered is a whole number between 6 and 210
- the order does not already decide everything
- the order has an incomparable pair to ask about
- the order is one this family draws
- the order is one this mode draws
- the order is small enough to search every collection of its elements
- the order is small enough to search every subset of
- the sets of the right size were all generated
- the size of the sets in the family is a whole number between 2 and 4
- the theorem needs the sets to be small enough that two can miss each other
- the two ends of an edge differ by exactly one element
- the view is one the family draws
- there are more subsets than elements
opens
15 kinds of claim · 5 placements
- a set is contained in its double negation
- and here it is strictly contained — the punched-out points come back
- and so does double-negation elimination
- between one and four points are punched out
- every element sits below its double negation
- every punched-out point is inside the set
- excluded middle fails somewhere in this algebra
- no open set larger than the implication satisfies the condition
- the implication really does meet the antecedent inside the consequent
- the negation of an open set is open
- the set sits strictly inside the ambient line
- the set together with its negation does not fill the line
- the union has as many pieces as the two sets between them
- three negations are the same as one
- three negations collapse to one
ordinal
45 kinds of claim · 35 placements
- the number of ticks per block is a whole number between 4 and 14 ×2
- a fundamental sequence belongs to a limit ordinal
- a larger ordinal grows at least as fast at every argument
- a limit mark is where the marks before it pile up
- a successor is one step past the ordinal below it
- an ordinal expression is built from whole numbers, w, +, * and ^
- and so do the two multiplications on the other side
- and the terms strictly increase
- at least one entry needs an exponent that is itself a power
- at least one of the ordinals drawn is a limit
- between one and five order types are drawn
- between one and four pairs of expressions are compared
- between three and six rates are drawn
- between two and six ordinals are drawn
- each number's ordinal is strictly larger than the one before it
- each part of the expression is a number, w, or a bracket
- each rate is increasing in its argument
- every limit mark has marks before it
- every limit mark has marks piling up before it
- every term of the sequence is below the ordinal it approaches
- F₀ adds one
- F₁ doubles its argument
- F₂ multiplies by two to the power of its argument
- nothing sits between the pile-up and the limit it accumulates at
- ordinal addition is associative on the drawn values
- the arrow clears both the last term and the supremum it points at
- the base the numbers are written in is a whole number between 2 and 4
- the brackets in the expression close
- the drawn pair is an ordinal of the form ω·k + m with k between 1 and 3
- the exponents fall and the coefficients are positive
- the hereditary form reads back as the number it came from
- the index into a fundamental sequence is a positive whole number
- the largest argument in the table is a whole number between 3 and 5
- the largest number in the table is a whole number between 6 and 34
- the marks along each line strictly increase
- the number of steps shown is a whole number between 3 and 12
- the number of terms shown is a whole number between 3 and 7
- the ordinal beside each term is strictly smaller than the one before it
- the ordinal view is one of goodstein, arith, cnf, fund, growth
- the pair drawn on the lines is one of the pairs in the table, or null for none
- the starting value is a whole number between 2 and 6
- the two additions agree
- the two multiplications by a whole number agree
- the whole expression was read
- zero has nothing below it to approach
relation-grid
13 kinds of claim · 22 placements
- a full column forces every row to carry a mark, so one reading implies the other
- no drawn row agrees with the built row everywhere it has been checked
- no row of the table is the Russell row
- the built row differs from row n in place n
- the drawn window is at least as wide as it is tall
- the labelling is one this figure knows
- the number of columns is a whole number between 2 and 14
- the number of drawn columns is a whole number between 3 and 16
- the number of drawn rows is a whole number between 3 and 12
- the number of rows is a whole number between 2 and 14
- the number of sets in the table is a whole number between 3 and 10
- the relation is one this figure knows how to draw
- the Russell row disagrees with row k at column k
syllogism
8 kinds of claim · 7 placements
- a form valid without existential import is valid with it
- every letter in the set expression names a drawn curve
- fifteen forms are valid with no assumption that anything exists
- nine more become valid once every term is assumed non-empty
- the form is three mood letters and a figure number, like AAA-1
- there are 256 syllogistic forms — four figures and sixty-four moods
- twenty-four forms are valid in the traditional list
- two circles realise all four patterns
tree
73 kinds of claim · 34 placements
- at 1 instances there is still a model, so the search has not finished ×5
- the assumption h2 is open where it is discharged ×3
- at 1 instances there is still a model ×2
- a conjunction is introduced from two derivations
- a conjunction is taken apart from one derivation
- a disjunction is introduced from one derivation
- a disjunction is used by considering both halves
- a negation is introduced from a derivation and its denial
- an assumption has nothing above it
- an implication is introduced from one derivation
- and both cases reach the same conclusion
- and every assumption it made has been discharged
- and it is the conjunction of what they derived
- and its antecedent is the discharged assumption
- and its consequent is what was derived
- and once it closes it stays closed
- and the count of models is positive at every stage drawn
- and the formula it proves is true in every row of its table
- and the goal follows from the lemma
- and the lemma the other proof uses is not a subformula of the goal
- and the named half is the conclusion
- and the named half is what was derived
- and the negated assumption is the conclusion
- and the second is its antecedent
- and the sweep contains both kinds
- between two and seven stages
- every drawn step is the resolvent of the two clauses above it
- every formula in the cut-free proof is a subformula of the goal, or its negation
- every leaf of the formula is a variable
- every level has a node that reaches the bottom
- every literal names a variable of the clause set
- every opening bracket in the formula is closed
- it closes exactly when the universal has been used 3 times
- modus ponens takes two derivations
- no node has more children than the branching factor
- resolution and the truth table agree on every one of the sets
- resolution reaches the empty clause exactly when no assignment satisfies the set
- so the conclusion is its consequent
- so the count of unsatisfiable sets and the count of refuted sets are one number
- the branching factor is a whole number between 2 and 3
- the case assumption h2 is open
- the clause set is one the family knows
- the conclusion of →I is an implication
- the conclusion of ¬I is a negation
- the conclusion of ∨I is a disjunction
- the cut-free proof closes, so the formula is a theorem
- the depth drawn is a whole number between 3 and 7
- the derivation ends at the stated goal
- the derivation is one of contraposition, transitivity, distribute
- the expansion does close, at some stage this figure reaches
- the first derivation gives a disjunction
- the first is an implication
- the formula and its disjunctive normal form agree on every row
- the formula has between one and five variables
- the formula is a non-empty string
- the lemma is itself a theorem, so it may be cut in
- the path passes through one node per level
- the pruning parameter is a whole number between 2 and 9
- the question is one of reaches, never
- the smallest unsatisfiable set of two-literal clauses needs four of them
- the sweep is over three variables
- the table has one row per assignment
- the tableau and the truth table reach the same verdict
- the tableau stays small enough to draw
- the tableau tests validity or satisfiability
- the tree drawn actually reaches the bottom row
- the two derivations are a formula and its denial
- the view is one the family draws
- the walk always has a surviving child to step to
- the whole formula is consumed by the parser
- there are twelve two-literal clauses on three variables
- this view draws a refutation, so the set has to be unsatisfiable
- which derived a conjunction
truth-table
11 kinds of claim · 12 placements
- every corner meets one edge per variable, each edge counted once
- every leaf of the formula is a variable
- every opening bracket in the formula is closed
- the cube is drawn for two, three or four variables
- the formula and its disjunctive normal form agree on every row
- the formula has between one and five variables
- the formula is a non-empty string
- the highlighted rows are the true ones, the false ones, or neither
- the table has one row per assignment
- the two ends of an edge differ in exactly one variable
- the whole formula is consumed by the parser
venn
11 kinds of claim · 9 placements
- 3 circles realise every one of the 8 patterns ×2
- 4 circles cannot realise all 16 patterns ×2
- and each of the sixteen is a single connected region
- every leaf of the formula is a variable
- every letter in the set expression names a drawn curve
- no pattern occupies more pieces than the arrangement has
- the formula is a non-empty string
- the four ellipses realise all sixteen patterns
- the number of sets is a whole number between 2 and 5
- the pieces the circles cut the plane into match Euler's count
- the whole formula is consumed by the parser
Computation
11 families
check-digit
8 kinds of claim · 2 placements
- a scheme that weights every position the same catches no transposition
- and every single-digit error too
- descending weights over a prime modulus catch every transposition
- every single-digit error is caught exactly when the modulus is at least ten and coprime to every weight
- the error kinds are single, transpose or twin
- the number is between four and fourteen digits
- the number is between six and fourteen digits
- the scheme is one of sum-9, sum-10, flat-11, weighted-10, isbn-11
construct
83 kinds of claim · 47 placements
- a rational is a whole numerator over a non-zero whole denominator
- a right angle can be trisected
- a root found by the theorem really is a root of the cubic
- a straight angle can be trisected
- a zero angle can be trisected
- and above it
- and exactly half way from the other end too
- and is not half way along after it
- and it fails when the given point is not the midpoint, so the midpoint is what is used
- and it is a different line from the segment
- and it is one radius beyond B
- and it lies on the segment
- and it sits over the midpoint
- and that crossing and the marked point are both on the circle
- and the diameter really is twice the radius
- and their images are not equally spaced
- between three and eight polygons, each with 3 to 24 sides
- both crossings exist
- cos(θ/3) is a root of the triple-angle cubic
- divisors are taken of a positive whole number
- each step lands short of the far end
- each step meets the circle
- each step of the compass round the circle meets it
- every image lands on the second line
- every point of the first round is where two drawn objects cross
- Gauss's criterion and the degree test agree about every polygon
- Gauss's criterion and the degree test agree about the tripled polygon
- nineteen of the polygons up to sixty can be drawn
- one round puts two points off the line
- six steps of the radius come back exactly to the start
- sixty degrees cannot be trisected
- some angle in the table the two instruments cannot cut, and the marked one can
- the angle comes from a polygon that can be drawn
- the angle is between 12 and 174 degrees
- the angle the placed straightedge makes is a third of the original
- the apex is near the segment
- the apex sees the diameter at a right angle
- the centre is equidistant from the ends of the diameter
- the circle has a sensible radius
- the constructed line is parallel to the diameter
- the cross ratio is the same on both lines
- the crossing is equidistant from the two ends of the remaining piece
- the denominator the cosines are taken over is a whole number between 2 and 16
- the diameter is tilted between 5 and 175 degrees
- the fixed opening is fixed
- the free point sits inside the segment PM
- the inverting circle meets the circle of radius AB
- the largest polygon tested is a whole number between 12 and 300
- the marked segment between the line and the circle is the radius
- the marked straightedge cuts every angle in the table
- the marks start equally spaced
- the middle mark is half way along before the projection
- the new height is √3/2
- the nine-gon is not — 3 is a Fermat prime but 9 repeats it
- the number being factorised is a whole number between 1 and 1000000
- the number of columns in the grid is a whole number between 6 and 20
- the number of compass steps is a whole number between 2 and 12
- the number of construction rounds is a whole number between 1 and 2
- the number of equally spaced marks is a whole number between 3 and 9
- the number of marks is odd so one of them is the midpoint
- the number whose square root is constructed is between 0 and 12
- the perpendicular at the join has height √n
- the point found is exactly half way along
- the second line is tilted between 0.15 and 0.75
- the second round is shown or not
- the segment cut off is longer than the radius far out and shorter close in
- the segment is between 0.4 and 6 units long
- the segment is between half a unit and two units long
- the segment really is longer than the opening can span in one go
- the seven-gon is not
- the seventeen-gon is constructible
- the sliding point and the centre are the same distance from the near crossing
- the two arcs about D and E meet
- the two arcs of the fixed opening meet
- the two crossings sit at the same height, so the line is parallel
- the view is one of root, trisect, polygons, compass, hexagon, straightedge, neusis, reach, parallel, poncelet, rusty
- the walk was built
- three steps of the radius reach the point twice as far away
- three steps reach the far side, which is the doubling
- twenty-four of the polygons up to a hundred can be drawn
- two points and one round of drawing give four more
- what is left is short enough for the fixed opening to span
- which makes it that piece's midpoint
cube-code
22 kinds of claim · 16 placements
- step 1 changes exactly one place ×7
- a code is more than one word and fewer than all of them
- and its worst single step changes all 4 places at once
- and the last corner is one step from the first, so the walk closes
- and visits none of them twice
- counting up in the ordinary way changes more places than that
- each cycle was met once in each direction
- every codeword has the length the cube has dimensions
- every corner meets one edge per coordinate
- every step of the code changes exactly one place
- every walk is enumerated for at most the 4-cube
- every word within 1 of a codeword decoded back to it
- the 3-cube carries exactly 6 such walks
- the 4-cube carries exactly 1,344
- the balls partition the cube exactly, so the code is perfect
- the code is a word list or one of repetition, parity, none, even2
- the dimension of the cube is a whole number between 2 and 4
- the drawn walks are the first of the ones counted
- the length of the words is a whole number between 2 and 4
- the radius of the balls drawn is a whole number between 0 and 2
- the view is one the family draws
- the walk visits all 8 corners
degree
44 kinds of claim · 32 placements
- ∛2 × ∛2 lands on a multiple of ∛2²
- ∛2 × ∛2² lands on a multiple of 1
- ∛2 × 1 lands on a multiple of ∛2
- ∛2² × ∛2 lands on a multiple of 1
- ∛2² × ∛2² lands on a multiple of ∛2
- ∛2² × 1 lands on a multiple of ∛2²
- 1 × ∛2 lands on a multiple of ∛2
- 1 × ∛2² lands on a multiple of ∛2²
- 1 × 1 lands on a multiple of 1
- a bigger subgroup names a smaller field, never the other way round
- a rational is a whole numerator over a non-zero whole denominator
- a subgroup of order two fixes exactly one root
- divisors are taken of a positive whole number
- each number under a root is a whole number between 2 and 40
- each number under a root is square-free, or the step is not a real step
- every coefficient is a whole number under 400
- every product of basis elements is a multiple of a basis element
- every rational root found by sweeping is one the theorem listed
- no integer polynomial in the searched range vanishes at π
- no power of two is a multiple of three
- no whole number the rational-root theorem allows is a root of x³ − m
- the closest miss is a genuine miss
- the coefficient bound is a whole number between 2 and 8
- the control polynomial really vanishes at its algebraic number
- the cube root really cubes to it
- the degree of a tower of square roots is a power of two
- the degree of the tower is the size of its basis
- the exact value and the decimal one agree
- the group of six permutations has exactly six subgroups
- the largest degree searched is a whole number between 1 and 4
- the leading coefficient is not zero
- the number being factorised is a whole number between 1 and 1000000
- the number being searched for is one of pi, sqrt2, cbrt2, phi
- the number whose cube root is taken is between 2 and 30
- the polynomial has degree between one and four
- the polynomial is named for the caption
- the powers of two are checked out to between 6 and 20 steps
- the product is the coefficient times the basis element it lands on
- the same search does find a polynomial for an algebraic number
- the searched number is a root of one of them
- the size of the subgroup times the degree of its field is the degree of the whole
- the tower has one basis element per subset of its roots
- the tower is built from one, two or three square roots
- the view is one the family draws
dissect
58 kinds of claim · 22 placements
- the left piece keeps its 1th edge at 0° ×21
- the right piece keeps its 1th edge at 0° ×21
- the left piece still touches its pin at 0° ×7
- the right piece still touches its pin at 0° ×7
- the number of sides is a whole number between 3 and 8 ×2
- a kite: and vertically
- a kite: the outward normals weighted by edge length cancel horizontally
- a parallelogram: and vertically
- a parallelogram: it has a centre of symmetry, so its edges pair off and the quantity vanishes
- a parallelogram: the outward normals weighted by edge length cancel horizontally
- a polygon of 5 sides falls into 3 triangles
- a polygon of n sides falls into n − 2 triangles
- a rectangle: and vertically
- a rectangle: it has a centre of symmetry, so its edges pair off and the quantity vanishes
- a rectangle: the outward normals weighted by edge length cancel horizontally
- a regular hexagon: and vertically
- a regular hexagon: it has a centre of symmetry, so its edges pair off and the quantity vanishes
- a regular hexagon: the outward normals weighted by edge length cancel horizontally
- a trapezium: and vertically
- a trapezium: the outward normals weighted by edge length cancel horizontally
- a triangle: and vertically
- a triangle: the outward normals weighted by edge length cancel horizontally
- a triangle's quantity does not vanish, so no number of cuts slides it into a rectangle
- an L: and vertically
- an L: the outward normals weighted by edge length cancel horizontally
- and exactly one step up
- and the other side at its midpoint
- and the same two tile the square
- at half a turn the three pieces tile the rectangle
- between one and five swing angles, each between 0 and 180 degrees
- between two and five shapes
- each numerator over its power of three is the cosine of that multiple
- each shape is a named list of between three and ten finite points
- no edge has zero length
- no numerator in the sequence is a multiple of three
- the apex sits over the base, away from its two ends
- the apex sits over the base, between its two ends
- the cube's dihedral angle is a quarter turn exactly
- the directions are sampled between 90 and 2000 times
- the fan of triangles tiles the polygon
- the number of multiples tested is a whole number between 6 and 30
- the number of risers in the staircase is a whole number between 1 and 5
- the polygon is turned by at most a half turn
- the polygon's radius is between 0.5 and 1.5
- the polygon's radius is between a half and two
- the rectangle and the square have the same area
- the rectangle has the triangle's area
- the same three pieces tile the rectangle
- the side of the square is a whole number between 2 and 24
- the slice meets one side at its midpoint
- the slide is exactly one step across
- the square's side is divisible by n(n+1) so every corner lands on a whole number
- the three pieces tile the triangle
- the triangle is between 0.4 and 1.6 times as tall as its base is long
- the triangles' areas add up to the polygon's
- the two pieces tile the rectangle
- the view is one of steps, polygon, dehn, hinge, translate, count
- three pieces per triangle
finite-field
16 kinds of claim · 16 placements
- there is a field with 4 elements only if 4 is a prime power ×7
- the size of the field is a whole number between 2 and 9 ×3
- a ring of composite size has a pair of non-zero elements multiplying to zero
- addition and multiplication are commutative
- an irreducible polynomial of the right degree was found
- and it is exactly the composite ones that leave an element without a reciprocal
- every non-zero element has a reciprocal
- multiplication distributes over addition
- multiplication is associative
- no two non-zero elements multiply to zero
- the exponent of a product is the sum of the exponents
- the field is closed
- the number being factorised is a whole number between 1 and 1000000
- the number of primitive elements is φ(q−1)
- the powers of a primitive element close back onto one
- the size of the ring drawn beside it is a whole number between 0 and 12
hamming-code
37 kinds of claim · 17 placements
- class 000 has as many words as the code has ×8
- class 000 has exactly one lightest word ×8
- a row called exact really divides to a power of two
- and always reaches what Gilbert and Varshamov guarantee
- and it weighs no more than one, which is what perfection means
- and none of them is zero
- and the climb is not monotone — some length is worse than the one before it
- at distance three the bound is only ever exact one short of a power of two
- each span is a distance between three and five and a longest length up to eight
- every codeword passes all three parity checks
- every rate is between zero and one
- every two words of the code found are at least the distance apart
- every word in the space is repaired to a codeword by its own syndrome
- four data bits give sixteen codewords
- nor Plotkin's, where it applies
- nor the Singleton bound
- some length meets the sphere-packing bound exactly
- the 128 words fall into eight classes
- the exact answer never beats the sphere-packing bound
- the highlighted codeword is a whole number between -1 and 15
- the lightest non-zero codeword weighs what the closest pair are apart
- the longest word length in the table is a whole number between 5 and 23
- the longest word length searched is a whole number between 5 and 8
- the minimum distance is a whole number between 3 and 5
- the minimum distance over all 120 pairs is three
- the minimum distance the bound is taken at is a whole number between 3 and 7
- the number of cosets shown across is a whole number between 4 and 8
- the rate at the longest length beats the rate at the shortest, at every distance drawn
- the received word is seven bits
- the repetition code and the Hamming code both meet the bound exactly
- the repetition code meets the bound at n = d
- the search finished rather than running out of budget
- the seven columns of the parity-check matrix are distinct
- the seven single errors give seven different syndromes
- the syndrome of a single error is the column of the position it hit
- the view is one of syndrome, cosets, bound, best, rate
- the word the syndrome repairs really is a codeword
incidence
26 kinds of claim · 17 placements
- the pair 0,1 appears once ×105
- a construction is known here for this many points
- a design on this many points was actually found by search
- a projective plane over GF(q) has q² + q + 1 points
- any two lines meet in exactly one point
- each point lies in (v−1)/2 triples
- every line carries q + 1 points
- every pair of points appears
- every point lies on q + 1 lines
- exactly one line passes through any two points
- the design drawn is one that exists
- the design has v(v−1)/6 triples
- the divisibility test and the residue rule agree
- the drawing is the projective plane over GF(2), up to relabelling
- the largest number of points in the table is a whole number between 9 and 25
- the largest number of points tested is a whole number between 9 and 40
- the number of points in the design drawn is a whole number between 7 and 15
- the number of points in the design is a whole number between 3 and 21
- the plane is built over a prime between 2 and 5
- the plane is built over a prime field between 2 and 5
- the points are labelled or not
- the residue rule and the divisibility rule agree at every size
- the search agrees with the arithmetic
- the size of the permuted set is a whole number between 1 and 8
- the three midpoints are the same distance from the centre, so one circle holds them
- the two divisibility conditions are exactly v ≡ 1 or 3 mod 6
latin
93 kinds of claim · 30 placements
- the squares for 1 and 2 produce every ordered pair once ×15
- the count at order 1 is a positive number ×8
- a symbol was found for column 1 ×6
- and once in each column of the square for 1 ×6
- column 1 repeats no symbol ×6
- column 1 was given a symbol it could take ×6
- every symbol appears once in each row of the square for 1 ×6
- relabelling left the pair 1, 2 orthogonal ×6
- symbol 0 is missing from exactly n−k of the columns ×6
- a field of order 4 has 3 non-zero multipliers ×5
- the relabelled square for 1 starts 0…3 along its first row ×5
- there is a field with 4 elements only if 4 is a prime power ×5
- row 1 uses every symbol once ×4
- every point lies on 4 lines, one from each class ×3
- the number of rows already placed is a whole number between 1 and 4 ×3
- the 3 available symbols are all used, so an extra square would repeat one ×2
- the order enumerated in full is a whole number between 1 and 4 ×2
- the order of the squares is a whole number between 3 and 8 ×2
- a square laid over itself produces only its own diagonal of pairs
- addition and multiplication are commutative
- an associative Latin square has an identity
- an irreducible polynomial of the right degree was found
- and every table whose elements are all self-inverse has one
- and fifty-six of order five
- and four have every element its own inverse
- and nine thousand four hundred and eight of order six
- and no pair of points is met by two lines
- and none of them carries the symbol already standing in that column
- and once in each column of the first square
- and once in each column of the second square
- and once in each column of the square for α
- and once in each column of the square for α+1
- and sixteen of them associate
- and three of them associate
- and twelve have an element of order four
- each class holds n lines
- each column may still take n−k symbols
- each square either associates or does not
- every line holds n of the points
- every non-zero element has a reciprocal
- every ordered pair of symbols occurs exactly once
- every pair of points is met by some line
- every set of columns can still take at least as many symbols as it has columns
- every symbol appears once in each row of the first square
- every symbol appears once in each row of the second square
- every symbol appears once in each row of the square for α
- every symbol appears once in each row of the square for α+1
- four of the sixteen have every element its own inverse
- multiplication distributes over addition
- multiplication is associative
- no table with an element of order four has a transversal
- no two non-zero elements multiply to zero
- no two standardised squares carry the same entry under the corner
- one shift per row already placed
- relabelling left the pair 1, α orthogonal
- relabelling left the pair 1, α+1 orthogonal
- relabelling left the pair α, α+1 orthogonal
- sixteen tables of order four associate
- the cyclic square has transversals exactly at odd orders
- the drawn order agrees with the table
- the field is closed
- the four self-inverse tables have the same number of transversals
- the largest order enumerated is a whole number between 3 and 6
- the Latin square view is one of transversal, mols, bound, net, count, extend, quasi, mates
- the multiplier of the second square is a whole number between 1 and 7
- the neighbouring orders are shown or not
- the new row uses every symbol once
- the number being factorised is a whole number between 1 and 1000000
- the number of columns is a whole number between 3 and 6
- the number of parallel classes drawn side by side is a whole number between 2 and 5
- the number of squares drawn side by side is a whole number between 1 and 4
- the order of the field the squares are built from is a whole number between 3 and 8
- the order of the plane is a whole number between 2 and 4
- the order of the square is a whole number between 3 and 7
- the pair is built from a prime order, where the construction works
- the parallel classes are the rows, the columns and one per square
- the quasigroup view is one of counts, tables
- the quoted orders are orders between 7 and 11 and larger than the ones enumerated
- the radius of the points is a whole number between 3 and 8
- the relabelled square for α starts 0…3 along its first row
- the relabelled square for α+1 starts 0…3 along its first row
- the second square uses a multiplier that makes it a different square
- the size of the field is a whole number between 2 and 16
- the size of the permuted set is a whole number between 1 and 8
- the squares for 1 and α produce every ordered pair once
- the squares for 1 and α+1 produce every ordered pair once
- the squares for α and α+1 produce every ordered pair once
- the total at order four agrees with every square of order four, listed
- there are 576 Latin squares of order four
- there are four reduced squares of order four
- there are twelve Latin squares of order three
- twelve of them have an element of order four
- two associative squares were found to draw
lcg
59 kinds of claim · 36 placements
- and output 4, which was not ×11
- all 4 windows of 2 bits occur somewhere in the period ×7
- the recovered rule matches output 0, which was given ×4
- the modulus is a whole number between 16 and 65536 ×3
- the register of 4 bits visits every nonzero state before repeating ×3
- a multiplier consistent with the outputs exists
- a multiplier is a whole number between 2 and 1048576
- a short vector the modulus annihilates exists
- and it is a de Bruijn sequence: every window of that width, exactly once
- and so is the second
- and the all-zero window never appears
- and they occur equally often, but for the one the all-zero state would have supplied
- and visits none of them twice
- each of them exactly once
- each window is between one bit and the register's width
- every generator's points fall on a genuine family of parallel lines
- every point of the sequence satisfies the relation exactly
- how many high bits are predicted is a whole number between 1 and 8
- no short whole-number relation holds between consecutive outputs
- the all-zero state is the one the register cannot leave
- the all-zero window is the one that is short, by exactly one
- the criterion and the measured period agree
- the dimension is a whole number between 2 and 3
- the first prime is a whole number between 3 and 4000
- the first prime is three modulo four, which the construction requires
- the highest tap is the register's own width, or it is a shorter register
- the increment is a whole number between 0 and 1048576
- the linear solve, run on this generator, predicts the next output wrongly
- the modulus is small enough that the arithmetic stays exact
- the multiplier is a whole number
- the multiplier is a whole number between 2 and 1048576
- the multipliers really do differ, by more than a factor of two in spacing
- the number of outputs it then predicts is a whole number between 2 and 16
- the number of outputs the solver is given is a whole number between 3 and 8
- the number of points is a whole number between 16 and 4096
- the number of predictions is a whole number between 50 and 4000
- the number of triples is a whole number between 100 and 4000
- the occupied hyperplanes are consecutive, so the family has no gaps
- the output shows every nonzero window of the register's width
- the patched sequence is as long as there are windows
- the predictor gets essentially every output right
- the register does not repeat before its full period
- the register visits every non-zero state before repeating
- the register width is a whole number between 5 and 14
- the relation involves the middle coordinate, so an edge-on view exists
- the relation involves the second coordinate
- the relation's normal lies in the screen, so the planes are seen edge on
- the second prime is a whole number between 3 and 4000
- the solver is given only a handful of outputs
- the taps are positions inside the register
- the triples lie on a small number of planes
- the two multipliers give different numbers of lines
- the vector really does annihilate every point
- the view is one of compare, period, planes, lfsr, spectral, recover, nextbit, bbs, equi
- the width of the register is a whole number between 3 and 6
- three to eight multiplier-and-increment pairs
- two multipliers below the modulus
- two taps
- which is enormously better than guessing the leading bits
poly-code
32 kinds of claim · 14 placements
- the symbol lost at position 1 came back the same ×7
- the number of symbols transmitted is a whole number between 3 and 12 ×4
- the alphabet is a prime between 5 and 17 ×3
- the number of message symbols is a whole number between 2 and 4 ×2
- and inside the Johnson radius the list stays short
- and the count climbs steeply once the radius passes the Johnson bound
- and they differ in that many places
- and this far from the second
- any k of the n symbols recover the message exactly
- at least k symbols survive, or nothing can be recovered and the figure would be a lie
- at the full length every codeword is inside the ball
- every choice of surviving symbols was tried
- every lost position is one of the positions sent
- every non-zero remainder has a reciprocal mod a prime
- more symbols are sent than the message has
- no position is lost twice
- no received word has two codewords within half the minimum distance
- only the zero message gives the zero codeword
- so at least two codewords are within that radius
- the code has two words differing in all but one place
- the code is shorter than the field and longer than the message
- the code meets the Singleton bound exactly
- the field is a prime between 3 and 31
- the lightest non-zero codeword weighs n − k + 1
- the message is k symbols of the alphabet
- the number of received words examined is a whole number between 40 and 2000
- the received word sits this far from the first codeword
- the survivors recover the message
- the view is one of erase, distance, list, pair
- there are at most as many evaluation points as field elements
- which is further than unique decoding reaches
- with one symbol too few, exactly p messages fit the survivors
Applied
7 families
apportion
101 kinds of claim · 38 placements
- district 1 gets exactly the seats it is due ×4
- party 1 gets exactly the seats it is due ×3
- the dial at δ = 0/20 is Adams's own answer ×2
- the dial at δ = 10/20 is Webster's own answer ×2
- the dial at δ = 20/20 is Jefferson's own answer ×2
- the house size is a whole number between 2 and 200 ×2
- a divisor above the interval awards fewer than the house size
- a divisor strictly inside the interval awards exactly the house size
- a quota violation is a whole number of seats away from the band
- a rational is a whole numerator over a non-zero whole denominator
- a rational is never divided by zero
- a region outside quota does not sit exactly on its quota
- a table meeting every district's target and every party's target exists
- a trial divisor awards no more seats than the search allows for
- Adams does the opposite
- Adams is found outside quota
- Adams is never found failing house or population monotonicity, which is a theorem about every divisor method
- Adams's awarded seats sum to the house size
- almost every instance drawn is usable
- and Hamilton is found losing a seat as the house grows
- and Hill's is the one no transfer improves for the relative difference
- and losing a seat to a region that grew more slowly
- and the smallest never gains one
- and Webster's bias for the largest region is smaller than either of theirs
- apportioning each district on its own gets at least one party's total wrong
- both ends of the interval land inside the drawn divisor axis
- each entry of the populations is a whole number between 1 and 10000000
- every house size swept has a seat for every region
- every method searched fails at least one of the three properties
- floor division is taken of a whole number by a positive whole number
- Hamilton gives every region the floor or the ceiling of its own quota
- Hamilton is never found outside quota, which is a theorem about it
- Hamilton's awarded seats sum to the house size
- Hamilton's seats sum to the house at every size swept
- Hill seats every region before any second seat
- Hill's awarded seats sum to the house size
- Jefferson gives the largest region more than its quota on average and the smallest less
- Jefferson is found outside quota
- Jefferson is never found failing house or population monotonicity, which is a theorem about every divisor method
- Jefferson's apportionment is improvable under every one of the three
- Jefferson's awarded seats sum to the house size
- no region's seat count falls anywhere in the swept range
- one seat target per district
- one seat target per party
- some allocation is stable for the district measure
- some allocation is stable for the relative measure
- some allocation is stable for the share measure
- the allocations stable for the district measure are all the same allocation
- the allocations stable for the relative measure are all the same allocation
- the allocations stable for the share measure are all the same allocation
- the awarded seats sum to exactly the house size
- the closed end of the interval awards exactly the house size
- the dial changes the answer at all
- the dial has a step exactly at one half
- the districts' seats and the parties' seats add to the same house
- the divisor and the priority ranking award the same seats
- the divisor method is one of jefferson, webster, adams
- the exact arithmetic stays inside the safe integer range
- the exact floor of a quota and its decimal floor agree
- the exact quotas sum to exactly the house size
- the exact quotas sum to the house size in both censuses
- the fall the sweep found is by a single seat
- the family of second censuses is small enough to walk in full
- the faster-growing region holds exactly one seat fewer after the census
- the floors leave between none and one seat per region over
- the growth step is a whole number between 1 and 100000
- the house has at least one seat for every region
- the house is large enough for every seat the method gives away for free
- the house is large enough for the seats the method gives away
- the interval of divisors is not empty
- the largest house swept is a whole number between 2 and 200
- the largest region never loses a seat as the dial turns toward Jefferson
- the marked region really holds fewer seats in the larger house
- the method is one of hamilton
- the method is one of hamilton, jefferson, webster, hill, adams
- the method is one of jefferson, webster, adams
- the mode is one of quota, alabama, divisor, population, family, bias, impossible, unfair, biproportional
- the named quota violation is a real comparison of the seats against the exact quota
- the number of growth steps is a whole number between 1 and 12
- the number of instances generated is a whole number between 50 and 1200
- the number of instances searched is a whole number between 20 and 400
- the number of regions is a whole number between 3 and 6
- the number of steps along the dial is a whole number between 8 and 40
- the open end of the interval awards more than the house size
- the populations is a list of 2 to 8 numbers
- the populations together stay inside the exact range
- the priority list reaches past the house size, so the interval has both ends
- the region that lost a seat grew by the larger exact ratio
- the seats awarded along the dial sum to the house size
- the second census fills exactly the same house
- the second census is larger than the first
- the second census totals what it says it does
- the signpost offset is a fraction between zero and one
- the slower-growing region holds exactly one seat more after the census
- the smallest house swept is a whole number between 2 and 200
- the sweep is short enough to draw one house size at a time
- the sweep runs over at least two house sizes
- Webster is found outside quota
- Webster is never found failing house or population monotonicity, which is a theorem about every divisor method
- Webster's apportionment is the one no transfer improves for the difference in seats per person
- Webster's awarded seats sum to the house size
ballot
191 kinds of claim · 57 placements
- voter 1 ranks A and B the same way in both profiles ×5
- each ballot ranks all 3 of them exactly once ×3
- the 3-voter profiles fall into one class per pattern of the pair ×3
- the number of candidates is a whole number between 2 and 5 ×3
- the space of 3-voter profiles was built entire ×3
- B wins all 4 of its pairs ×2
- each candidate of the pair is a whole number between 0 and 2 ×2
- every one of the 64 profiles is examined ×2
- the manipulating voter's true ranking ranks all 3 of them exactly once ×2
- the number of judges is a whole number between 3 and 7 ×2
- A ≻ B ≻ D ≻ C is not an improvement and is not marked as one
- A ≻ C ≻ B ≻ D is not an improvement and is not marked as one
- A ≻ C ≻ B is not an improvement and is not marked as one
- A ≻ C ≻ D ≻ B is not an improvement and is not marked as one
- A ≻ D ≻ B ≻ C is not an improvement and is not marked as one
- A ≻ D ≻ C ≻ B is not an improvement and is not marked as one
- A does not beat everybody
- A has more Borda points than B
- A has more Borda points than C
- A has more Borda points than D
- A has more Borda points than E
- A has more first places than B
- A has more first places than C
- A has more first places than D
- A has more first places than E
- a profile is between one and eight voter groups
- a rational is a whole numerator over a non-zero whole denominator
- A really beats B
- A wins all 4 of its pairs
- an odd number of judges
- an odd number of judges, so majorities are decisive
- an odd number of judges, three to seven, each with a yes or no on three questions
- and it is silent on more profiles than the majority quota is
- and most do not
- and none is both, which is the impossibility this agenda exhibits
- and on some that are not aligned, so alignment is sufficient and not necessary
- and some are consistent
- and some do not, so neither procedure is always wrong
- and the aligned rule gives up universal domain
- and the drawn profile really is one of them
- B ≻ A ≻ C ≻ D elects B, which the voter ranks above D
- B ≻ A ≻ C elects B, which the voter ranks above C
- B ≻ A ≻ C is not an improvement and is not marked as one
- B ≻ A ≻ D ≻ C elects B, which the voter ranks above D
- B ≻ C ≻ A ≻ D elects B, which the voter ranks above D
- B ≻ C ≻ A elects B, which the voter ranks above C
- B ≻ C ≻ A is not an improvement and is not marked as one
- B ≻ C ≻ D ≻ A elects B, which the voter ranks above D
- B ≻ D ≻ A ≻ C elects B, which the voter ranks above D
- B ≻ D ≻ C ≻ A elects B, which the voter ranks above D
- B beats every other candidate head to head
- B does not beat everybody
- B has more Borda points than A
- B has more Borda points than C
- B has more Borda points than D
- B has more Borda points than E
- B really beats C
- Borda can be flipped by moving a third candidate somewhere in this range
- Borda puts A above B in the first profile
- Borda puts B above A in the second
- C ≻ A ≻ B ≻ D is not an improvement and is not marked as one
- C ≻ A ≻ B is not an improvement and is not marked as one
- C ≻ A ≻ D ≻ B is not an improvement and is not marked as one
- C ≻ B ≻ A ≻ D elects B, which the voter ranks above D
- C ≻ B ≻ A is not an improvement and is not marked as one
- C ≻ B ≻ D ≻ A elects B, which the voter ranks above D
- C ≻ D ≻ A ≻ B is not an improvement and is not marked as one
- C ≻ D ≻ B ≻ A is not an improvement and is not marked as one
- C does not beat everybody
- C really beats A
- C really beats D
- Coombs can be flipped by moving a third candidate somewhere in this range
- Coombs eliminated exactly one candidate in every round but the last
- Coombs puts A above B in the first profile
- Coombs puts B above A in the second
- Coombs reaches a winner without a level elimination
- counting the three-way cycles gives the same answer as looking for a winner
- D ≻ A ≻ B ≻ C is not an improvement and is not marked as one
- D ≻ A ≻ C ≻ B is not an improvement and is not marked as one
- D ≻ B ≻ A ≻ C is not an improvement and is not marked as one
- D ≻ B ≻ C ≻ A is not an improvement and is not marked as one
- D ≻ C ≻ A ≻ B is not an improvement and is not marked as one
- D ≻ C ≻ B ≻ A is not an improvement and is not marked as one
- D beats every other candidate head to head
- D does not beat everybody
- D really beats A
- D wins all 4 of its pairs
- dictatorship of judge 1 gives up at least one condition
- dictatorship of judge 1 is consistent wherever it is defined
- dictatorship of judge 1 is defined somewhere
- E does not beat everybody
- each judge is consistent
- each voter group carries a count and an order
- each voter group's size is a whole number between 1 and 500
- every assignment of positions to judges is considered
- every ballot the voter could submit produces a single winner
- every class holds the same number of profiles
- every consistent rule leaves some proposition undecided
- every inconsistent majority on this agenda has the same shape
- every judge's own three answers hang together
- every profile in the space was decided one way or the other
- every ranking the voter could submit was built
- every systematic anonymous rule on this agenda is considered
- instant runoff can be flipped by moving a third candidate somewhere in this range
- instant runoff eliminated exactly one candidate in every round but the last
- instant runoff puts A above B in the first profile
- instant runoff puts B above A in the second
- instant runoff reaches a winner without a level elimination
- majority is consistent on every aligned profile
- majority is defined somewhere
- majority, aligned profiles only gives up at least one condition
- majority, aligned profiles only is consistent wherever it is defined
- majority, aligned profiles only is defined somewhere
- no candidate beats every other, which is what having no Condorcet winner means
- no misreport helps the voter once only two candidates remain
- not every profile is aligned, which is what makes the restriction a restriction
- one candidate has strictly the most Borda points
- one candidate has strictly the most first places
- one disagreeing profile is drawn
- plain majority on every proposition is the rule the impossibility rules out
- plurality can be flipped by moving a third candidate somewhere in this range
- plurality puts A above B in the first profile
- plurality puts B above A in the second
- premise-based gives up at least one condition
- premise-based is consistent wherever it is defined
- premise-based is defined somewhere
- raising the quota never reduces how often the rule says nothing
- some profiles make the two procedures disagree
- some profiles produce an inconsistent majority
- some rules are complete
- the Coombs winner ends with a strict majority
- the dictatorship gives up anonymity
- the distinct winners counted by walking the list agree with the set
- the electorate is a whole number between 2 and 2000
- the electorate is odd, so the two-candidate control cannot end level
- the exact arithmetic stays inside the safe integer range
- the exhausted profile space is small enough to give every profile its own cell
- the exhausted profile space stays small enough to walk
- the honest ballot appears exactly once among the submissions
- the honest winner does not depend on the order the ballots are listed in
- the instant-runoff winner ends with a strict majority
- the largest electorate searched is a whole number between 3 and 6
- the majority between A and B is decided rather than level
- the majority between A and C is decided rather than level
- the majority between A and D is decided rather than level
- the majority between B and C is decided rather than level
- the majority between B and D is decided rather than level
- the majority between C and D is decided rather than level
- the majority quota is inconsistent on some profiles
- the majority tournament runs in a cycle through every candidate
- the majority's three answers do not hang together, which is the whole point
- the margin between A and B is antisymmetric
- the margin between A and C is antisymmetric
- the margin between A and D is antisymmetric
- the margin between A and E is antisymmetric
- the margin between B and C is antisymmetric
- the margin between B and D is antisymmetric
- the margin between B and E is antisymmetric
- the margin between C and D is antisymmetric
- the margin between C and E is antisymmetric
- the margin between D and E is antisymmetric
- the mode is one of profile, cycle, rules, iia, manipulate, judge, agenda, escape, doctrinal, impossible, escapes, quota, aligned
- the number of distinct winners lies between one and the number of rules
- the number of judges is odd, so no question ties
- the number of voters in the exhausted space is a whole number between 2 and 6
- the ordered pairs inside a class counted two ways agree
- the pair is two different candidates
- the premise-based answer is consistent
- the premise-based rule gives up systematicity
- the profile space has one entry for every assignment of ballots
- the rule being manipulated is one of plurality, borda, irv, coombs
- the rule to violate is one of plurality, borda, irv, coombs
- the two opposed counts for A against B sum to the electorate
- the two opposed counts for A against C sum to the electorate
- the two opposed counts for A against D sum to the electorate
- the two opposed counts for A against E sum to the electorate
- the two opposed counts for B against C sum to the electorate
- the two opposed counts for B against D sum to the electorate
- the two opposed counts for B against E sum to the electorate
- the two opposed counts for C against D sum to the electorate
- the two opposed counts for C against E sum to the electorate
- the two opposed counts for D against E sum to the electorate
- the two profiles really differ on some ballot
- the two rules disagree on this profile, which is what makes it a choice
- the two-candidate contest has a winner whichever ballot the voter submits
- the unanimity quota is inconsistent on none
- three judges with three yes-or-no answers each
- unanimity gives up at least one condition
- unanimity gives up completeness
- unanimity is consistent wherever it is defined
- unanimity is defined somewhere
coalition
92 kinds of claim · 41 placements
- the layer formula and the average over all 3! orders agree for A ×2
- the layer formula and the average over all 3! orders agree for B ×2
- the layer formula and the average over all 3! orders agree for C ×2
- the quota is a whole number between 1 and 120 ×2
- the weights is a list of 3 to 3 numbers ×2
- A and B are interchangeable
- a member who can never swing a vote has no power by either count
- a rational is a whole numerator over a non-zero whole denominator
- a rational is never divided by zero
- and at least one of the other rules fails one
- and D adds nothing
- and it falls at about the square-root rate over the whole sweep
- and satisfies the other three
- and the additivity column's rule gives a different answer here
- and the efficiency column's rule gives a different answer here
- and the symmetry column's rule gives a different answer here
- and the the null player column's rule gives a different answer here
- and their heights add to it
- at least one assembly drawn has power and weight ordered differently
- averaging what each adds satisfies all four on this game
- averaging what each player adds passes every condition on every game tested
- between one and four assemblies
- between three and eight increasing sample sizes
- C is not interchangeable with them, so symmetry is a real condition here
- each entry of the capacities the users need is a whole number between 1 and 200
- each entry of the weights is a whole number between 1 and 40
- each share lands on the grid the search used
- every coalition's value is a whole number
- every estimate is a share
- every ordering ends with everybody in
- no other split on the table has a quieter list of complaints
- on this game the nucleolus and the average split are different points
- some coalition objects to every split drawn here
- some split is individually rational
- somebody can swing something, or the assembly decides nothing
- the capacities the users need is a list of 2 to 5 numbers
- the closed-form shares pay the whole bill
- the coalitions together demand more than there is to give
- the core is drawn for three players
- the core, nucleolus and excess views are written for a game whose value is shared out, and this game's value is a bill
- the denominator the splits are searched over is a whole number between 12 and 180
- the empty coalition is worth nothing
- the error at the largest sample is a third of the error at the smallest
- the error is a distance
- the exact arithmetic stays inside the safe integer range
- the exact shares add to one
- the game is big enough that listing the orders is the point
- the game is one of partnership, majority, gloves, shops, capacity, dummy
- the game names a value for every coalition
- the grid divides the whole group's value evenly
- the group A pays no more together than it would alone
- the group AB pays no more together than it would alone
- the group ABC pays no more together than it would alone
- the group ABCD pays no more together than it would alone
- the group ABD pays no more together than it would alone
- the group AC pays no more together than it would alone
- the group ACD pays no more together than it would alone
- the group AD pays no more together than it would alone
- the group B pays no more together than it would alone
- the group BC pays no more together than it would alone
- the group BCD pays no more together than it would alone
- the group BD pays no more together than it would alone
- the group C pays no more together than it would alone
- the group CD pays no more together than it would alone
- the group D pays no more together than it would alone
- the layer formula and the average over all 4! orders agree for D
- the layers stack up to the largest requirement
- the marginal contributions along one ordering add up to the whole
- the nucleolus survives every objection exactly when some split does
- the power shares add to one
- the proportional rule needs somebody to be worth something alone
- the quota is more than half the weight and no more than all of it
- the requirements are given smallest first
- the resolution of the exhaustive sweep is a whole number between 12 and 120
- the rule in the additivity column fails additive
- the rule in the efficiency column fails efficient
- the rule in the symmetry column fails symmetric
- the rule in the the null player column fails null player
- the search is written for three players
- the second game names a whole value for each of the eight coalitions of three, starting at nothing
- the seed is a whole number between 0 and 10000
- the shares add to what the whole group is worth
- the shares add up to what the whole group is worth
- the splits achieving the minimum are one point to within a grid step
- the sweep and the balancedness condition agree about whether any split survives
- the users do not all need the same thing, or there is nothing to divide unevenly
- the view is one of axioms, core, nucleolus, excess, unique, power, sample, layers
- the whole group is worth a whole number
- there is more than one layer, or the figure has nothing to show
- two games on the same number of players
- two to four games this family knows
- what all four players are worth together is a whole number between 4 and 40
divide
53 kinds of claim · 24 placements
- person 1 values their own share at least as highly as person 1's ×9
- the value matrix, person 1's row is a list of 3 to 3 numbers ×7
- person 1's valuation is a list of 6 to 6 numbers ×6
- trimming piece 1 is worth exactly a third of the trimming to person 3 ×6
- the control matrix, person 1's row is a list of 3 to 3 numbers ×5
- each entry of person 1's valuation is a whole number between 0 and 100 ×4
- no allocation of these goods is envy-free — all 8 were tested and each failed ×4
- person 1 strictly prefers person 3's piece to their own ×4
- person 1's own piece is worth at least 25 to person 1 ×4
- person 1's valuation of the whole cake is 100 ×4
- person 1's values of the 4 pieces account for the whole cake ×4
- person 2's calling mark stays over the bar it belongs to ×4
- each entry of the control matrix, person 1's row is a whole number between 0 and 100 ×3
- each entry of the value matrix, person 1's row is a whole number between 0 and 100 ×3
- person 1's values of the three shares account for the whole cake ×3
- person 2 called the knife at exactly 25 ×3
- piece 1 is worth exactly a third of the cake to person 1 ×3
- the control matrix: person 1 values the whole set at 100 ×3
- the valuations are given for 2 to 2 people ×3
- the value matrix: person 1 values the whole set at 100 ×3
- a knife is asked to pass a non-negative amount of value
- a rational is a whole numerator over a non-zero whole denominator
- a rational is never divided by zero
- every envy-free allocation is also envy-free up to one item
- every person still waiting gets a calling mark
- every way of giving each item to one of the people was formed
- person 2 does not envy person 1's piece before the trimming is divided
- person 4, who never called, is left with at least 25
- the chooser envies nobody, having taken the piece it valued higher
- the chooser gains strictly more than half — the promise is not tight
- the chooser's piece is worth at least half the cake to the chooser
- the chooser's values of the two pieces sum to the whole cake
- the claim that somebody is left envious is either made or not made
- the claim that the chooser strictly gains is either made or not made
- the control matrix gives a row of values for two, three or four people
- the control was searched over every allocation too
- the control: a chooser with the cutter's own measure gains exactly nothing
- the control: the same search finds an envy-free allocation where one exists
- the cutter's envy is exactly zero: the piece left behind is worth what the other is
- the division being shown is one of cutchoose, trim, items, moving
- the division is proportional and not envy-free: somebody prefers another's piece
- the exact arithmetic stays inside the safe integer range
- the exact value of the left piece and the decimal one agree
- the number of items in the control matrix is a whole number between 2 and 6
- the number of items in the value matrix is a whole number between 2 and 6
- the number of segments the cake is cut into is a whole number between 2 and 12
- the round-robin allocation is envy-free up to one item
- the three pieces go to three different people
- the trimmed piece ties person 2's second largest exactly
- the value asked for is still ahead of the knife
- the value matrix gives a row of values for two, three or four people
- two calling marks never print on top of one another
- under the cutter's own measure the two pieces are exactly equal
game
82 kinds of claim · 36 placements
- moving participant 1 from state 0 lowers the potential by exactly what they save ×12
- nobody improves by moving alone out of state 1 ×4
- the column chooser's options names all 2 of them in one to three characters ×2
- the row chooser's options names all 2 of them in one to three characters ×2
- a cell carries both marks exactly when neither chooser can gain by moving alone
- a rational is a whole numerator over a non-zero whole denominator
- a rational is never divided by zero
- all the traffic arrives at T
- all the traffic leaves S after the link is added
- all the traffic leaves S before the link is added
- and a move that does not improve raises it by exactly what it costs
- at least one column holds the row chooser exactly to the value
- at least one order of elimination was run
- at least one state has no improving move, so an equilibrium exists
- between two and four participants
- both of them sit on the diagonal, which is what makes the two tie-breakers comparable
- every cell of the matrix was put to both tests
- every distribution on the lattice was tested
- every order of elimination reaches the same surviving set
- every payoff is a whole number no larger than 20 in size
- every traveller is strictly slower after the zero-cost link is added
- no mixing weight on the sweep guarantees the row chooser more than the peak
- no mixture on the lattice holds the row chooser below the value
- no route is cheaper than the one everybody is on, so the flow after is an equilibrium
- no split of the traffic on the lattice costs less in total than the computed optimum
- some pair of columns achieves the column chooser's best mixture
- the best correlated equilibrium is at least as good as the best pure one
- the best use of the added link is somewhere between none of the traffic and all of it
- the bimatrix carries two payoffs in every cell
- the bimatrix drawn by the payoff mode is one of coordination, none, dominant, three
- the bimatrix has between 2 and 4 columns
- the bimatrix has between 2 and 4 rows
- the bimatrix is rectangular — every row offers the same columns
- the closed form for the least possible total agrees with pricing its own flow edge by edge
- the column chooser's mixture holds the row chooser to at most the value against every row
- the computed optimum is itself a point of the lattice
- the correlated mode draws a two-by-two game
- the cost of a fixed-cost link is a whole number between 1 and 400
- the cost per unit of flow on a congestible link is a whole number between 1 and 10
- the crossing sits strictly inside the unit interval
- the drawn distribution is a correlated equilibrium
- the drawn distribution is whole numerators
- the drawn distribution sums to one
- the equilibrium costs strictly more in total than the optimum
- the exact arithmetic stays inside the safe integer range
- the exact value and its decimal recomputation agree
- the first option is the better reply above the crossing and the worse below it
- the first resource never gets cheaper as more use it
- the first resource prices every load it can carry, as whole numbers no larger than forty
- the fixed-cost link is cheap enough that the old routes beat the new one
- the fixed-cost link is dear enough that the added link is taken by everybody
- the game drawn has exactly two pure equilibria
- the game the correlated mode draws is one of chicken, stag, battle
- the game the selection mode draws is one of chicken, stag, battle
- the lattice contains at least one correlated equilibrium
- the lattice of distributions has a denominator between 4 and 24
- the mode of the game family is one of payoff, mixed, dominance, network, correlated, potential, select
- the pure equilibrium AA is a correlated equilibrium too
- the pure equilibrium BB is a correlated equilibrium too
- the pure equilibrium CD is a correlated equilibrium too
- the pure equilibrium DC is a correlated equilibrium too
- the pure equilibrium HH is a correlated equilibrium too
- the pure equilibrium SS is a correlated equilibrium too
- the ratio of the equilibrium's total to the least possible total is exact
- the row chooser's maximin and the column chooser's minimax are the same number
- the row chooser's mixture is worth at least the value against every single column
- the second never gets cheaper as more use it
- the second prices every load it can carry, as whole numbers no larger than forty
- the selection mode draws a two-by-two game
- the state of least potential is one of them
- the surviving column is a best reply to the surviving row
- the surviving row is a best reply to the surviving column
- the traffic entering the network is a whole number between 3 and 40
- the two lines are not parallel, or there is no crossing to draw
- the two lines meet at the mixed equilibrium
- the two routes cost the same before the link is added, so nobody moves
- the zero-sum matrix has between 2 and 4 columns
- the zero-sum matrix has exactly two rows — the mixing probability is one number
- the zero-sum matrix is rectangular — every row offers the same columns
- what arrives at A leaves A
- what arrives at B leaves B
- with two columns
match
49 kinds of claim · 25 placements
- 1's ranking of side one ranks all 4 of them exactly once ×14
- A's ranking of side two ranks all 4 of them exactly once ×4
- B's ranking of side two ranks all 4 of them exactly once ×4
- the matching drawn as unstable ranks all 4 of them exactly once ×4
- C's ranking of side two ranks all 4 of them exactly once ×3
- D's ranking of side two ranks all 4 of them exactly once ×2
- the member of side two whose lists are searched is a whole number between 0 and 3 ×2
- a profitable misreport is profitable under the ranking actually held
- a proposer still has a name left to propose to
- at least one of the matchings has no blocking pair at all
- at the top, every member of side two has its worst stable partner
- E's ranking of side two ranks all 5 of them exactly once
- each annotation fits inside its own cell with a gap to the cell beside it
- each member of side one settles on the last name it proposed to
- every matching of the two sides was formed
- every ordered pair of stable matchings was joined and met
- every pair of the two sides is put the blocking question
- every proposer ends the construction matched
- every ranking the participant could submit was formed
- every stable matching lies between the two the construction can reach
- no member of the proposing side has a profitable misreport
- nobody proposes to the same name twice
- nothing with a blocking pair is anything the construction returns
- side one has one ranking per member
- side two has one ranking per member
- submitting the true ranking returns the truthful matching
- the bottom of the order is what the construction returns with side two proposing
- the construction returns a one-to-one pairing
- the count of pairs put the blocking question
- the instance has a matching that stability excludes, or there is nothing to draw
- the instance has at least one stable matching
- the join of two stable matchings is stable
- the matching side one proposing returns is in the zero band of the census
- the matching side two proposing returns is in the zero band of the census
- the matching this mode draws is one stability actually excludes
- the meet of two stable matchings is stable
- the mode of the match family is one of run, blocking, lattice, strategy
- the pointwise better of two stable matchings is a matching
- the pointwise worse of two stable matchings is a matching
- the proposals counted and the proposals drawn are the same proposals
- the rounds cannot outnumber the proposals available
- the settled matching has no blocking pair
- the size of each side is a whole number between 2 and 6
- the tally accounts for every matching exactly once
- the top is at least as good as every stable matching for side one
- the top of the order is what the construction returns with side one proposing
- the true ranking is one of the rankings searched
- the whole strategy space of both sides was searched
- the zero column of the tally is the stable set
polytope
99 kinds of claim · 43 placements
- the program at b₂ = 2 has at least one feasible vertex ×33
- the program at b₂ = 2 is bounded — an objective that increases without limit has no optimal vertex to draw ×33
- the program at b₂ = 5/2 has at least one feasible vertex ×32
- the program at b₂ = 5/2 is bounded — an objective that increases without limit has no optimal vertex to draw ×32
- the program at b₁ = 2 has at least one feasible vertex ×31
- the program at b₁ = 2 is bounded — an objective that increases without limit has no optimal vertex to draw ×31
- the program at b₁ = 5/2 has at least one feasible vertex ×30
- the program at b₁ = 5/2 is bounded — an objective that increases without limit has no optimal vertex to draw ×30
- the weights on person 1's task 1 add back to the share ×16
- round 1: what is left still has a whole assignment inside it ×5
- person 1's shares add to a whole task ×4
- task 1 is exactly covered ×4
- constraint row 1 constrains at least one variable ×3
- constraint row 1 has one coefficient per variable ×3
- the decomposition needs at most n² − 2n + 2 = 5 whole assignments ×2
- the right-hand side is a list of 2 to 2 numbers ×2
- a program here has between two and five constraint rows
- a rational is a whole numerator over a non-zero whole denominator
- a rational is never divided by zero
- a set of prices whose total equals the cheapest assignment exists
- an intersection is kept exactly when it satisfies every constraint
- and every corner is a whole assignment
- and every pair the assignment uses is tight
- and its weights add to one
- and the fractional corner is a half on every edge
- and the weight taken out is positive
- between three and six edges
- each decomposition rebuilds every entry exactly
- each entry of the right-hand side is a whole number between 0 and 400
- each piece's slope is the dual variable on that piece
- every complementary product is exactly zero
- every constraint coefficient is a whole number of size at most 40
- every dual certificate at this optimum gives the same price for the swept constraint
- every feasible primal value is at most every feasible dual value
- every objective coefficient is a whole number of size at most 40
- every pair of constraints was formed, not a selection of them
- every set of people is willing to take at least as many tasks as there are of them
- no dual variable and no reduced cost is negative
- no feasible lattice point beats the best vertex
- no pair's two prices exceed its cost
- no share is negative
- no slack and no variable is negative at the optimum
- so a mixture containing it would give a share to a pairing the corner refuses
- so its total is half the number of edges
- so the prices add to the cheapest assignment's cost, which certifies it
- some order gives a genuinely different decomposition of the same table
- the constraint whose right-hand side is swept is a whole number between 1 and 2
- the corners number the permutations, and no more
- the cost table is square
- the drawn dual region is convex
- the drawn primal region is convex
- the dual certificate is worth exactly what the primal optimum is worth
- the dual is drawn only for a program with two constraints — with more, the dual polytope has more than two variables and is not a polygon in the plane
- the dual optimum is unique, so each constraint has one price — a degenerate optimum, with more than two constraints through one point, has a whole set of them and no single table of products
- the dual program has at least one feasible vertex
- the dual program is bounded — an objective that increases without limit has no optimal vertex to draw
- the exact arithmetic stays inside the safe integer range
- the exact optimum and the decimal one agree
- the exact optimum at the top of the sweep and the decimal one agree
- the feasible vertices are in convex position
- the first order decomposes the table completely
- the fractional table needs at least two whole assignments
- the grid holds more matrices than there are permutations
- the grid the search runs on is a whole number between 3 and 8
- the high end of the sweep is a whole number between 1 and 400
- the low end of the sweep is a whole number between 0 and 400
- the multipliers reproduce the objective exactly
- the number of people is a whole number between 2 and 4
- the objective has one coefficient per variable
- the objective is not identically zero
- the optimal vertex has a dual certificate — a non-negative multiplier on each binding constraint
- the optimal vertex's coordinates are labelled clear of every dot, every value and the axis ticks
- the optimum has a dual certificate
- the optimum is linear across this interval, so the drawn segment is exact
- the polytope figure's mode is one of primal, dual, slack, shadow, birkhoff, extreme, support, assign, hungarian, lottery, fractional
- the primal maximum and the dual minimum are the same number
- the primal program has at least one feasible vertex
- the primal program is bounded — an objective that increases without limit has no optimal vertex to draw
- the reduced cost is the multiplier on the variable's own non-negativity
- the relaxation has a corner that is not whole
- the round empties at least one more cell than it found
- the share table is one of thirds, quarters, sparse
- the size of the assignment is a whole number between 2 and 4
- the slope of the optimum equals the dual variable for the swept constraint
- the support contains a whole assignment
- the sweep produced at least one linear piece
- the sweep runs over between two and sixty units of the right-hand side
- the sweep solved the program once at every whole right-hand side
- the table is one the family knows
- the table is square
- the table is used up exactly
- the two optima agree as decimals too
- the weights add to one
- there are n! = 6 whole assignments
- there is one breakpoint between consecutive pieces
- there is one product per constraint and one per variable
- two different assignments differ somewhere
- weak duality was checked on the whole cross product of the two vertex lists
- which beats every whole matching, so the relaxation is genuinely loose