Iteration
Named by 11 essays across one field — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.
The staircase that shows the whole orbit
Take a number, feed it to a rule, feed the answer back in. There is a way of drawing that on the rule's own graph which turns the entire future of a starting point into a shape — and the shape is legible.
A point that pulls, and a point that pushes
Every crossing of a curve with the diagonal is a value the rule leaves alone. Whether anything ever arrives there is decided by one number — the slope at the crossing — and the picture makes the reason obvious.
A difference too small to draw
Two starting points a ten-thousandth apart, under the same rule, with nothing random anywhere. Within forty steps they have nothing in common — and the rule was not doing anything to them that it does not do to everything.
The shape in every picture of itself
One line of arithmetic, repeated, with a single complex number as its only input. Sort the numbers by whether the result stays bounded and the boundary between the two answers is the most complicated object anyone draws from a rule this short.
One c, one picture
The same iteration, with the parameter held still and the starting point varied instead. Every complex number gets its own picture, and moving the parameter a hair can shatter it into dust.
Where Newton's method goes instead
An algorithm designed to find roots, run from every starting point at once. Three roots, three basins, and a boundary at which all three are arbitrarily close — so a rule with no randomness in it has starting points whose answer cannot be predicted.
Eight rules and a triangle
A row of cells, each one deciding its next state from the three above it. Eight cases, one bit of output each — a rule that fits in a byte, and 256 of them in total. One of those bytes draws Pascal's triangle.
The rule that computes
One of the 256 elementary rules can run any program. Not simulate one, not approximate one — a machine that can compute anything computable, built from a lookup table with eight rows and nothing else.
Three gaps and no more
Turn a circle by the same irrational angle over and over. The points never repeat and never settle, and yet at every single stage the gaps they leave take at most three different lengths — never four, at any number of steps, for any angle.
The orbit that must come back
A system with finitely many states has to repeat itself. Poincaré showed the same thing holds when the states are a continuum — almost every starting point returns arbitrarily close to where it began, however complicated the rule, and the argument is the pigeonhole principle with volume in place of counting.
The question nobody can answer
Halve it if it is even, triple it and add one if it is odd. Every number anyone has tried comes down to one. Nobody can prove they all do, and the reason is not that the problem is hard to state.
Named alongside it
The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.
OrbitComplex numbersFractalLogistic mapSelf similarityBasin of attractionCellular automatonCobwebConnectednessConvergenceDerivativeDeterminism