Doing infinitely many things
The oldest algorithm, drawn as a tiling
Euclid's method for finding a greatest common divisor is usually presented as a loop. It is also a way of tiling a rectangle with squares, and the tiling explains why it works.
AnalysisAdding up rectangles until they stop being rectangles
The integral is defined as a limit of sums of rectangles. The definition is exact, the picture is honest about what it costs, and the gap between them is the whole subject.
AnalysisA square wave built entirely out of round ones
Add enough sine waves together and flat tops and vertical cliffs appear from nothing. Almost — there is a 9% overshoot that never goes away, and it is not a bug.
AnalysisThe curve that is its own slope
There is exactly one shape of exponential curve whose steepness at every point equals its height at that point. The number that produces it is 2.71828…, and it was not chosen for elegance.
GeometryA circle unrolled into a triangle
Take a disc apart into rings, straighten each one, and stack them. The result is a triangle whose base is the circumference and whose height is the radius — and its area is the disc's.
AnalysisA sum whose terms vanish and whose total does not
Add a half, a third, a quarter, and keep going. The terms shrink to nothing and the total passes every number there is — but so slowly that no computation will ever watch it happen.
AnalysisOne point's worth of information
A Taylor series claims that everything a function does, everywhere, is encoded in its behaviour at a single point. That claim is extraordinary, it is often true, and the cases where it fails are the interesting ones.
AnalysisThe slope of a single point
A slope needs two points. A derivative is the slope at one. The construction that bridges the gap is a sequence of secants, and the whole difficulty of calculus is in what "the limit of that sequence" is allowed to mean.
AnalysisThe same terms, in a different order, adding to whatever is asked
Flip alternate signs in the harmonic series and it converges. Reorder the terms — add nothing, remove nothing — and it converges to any number chosen in advance. Addition stops being commutative, and the picture shows where it goes.
ProbabilityA walk that always comes home, until it does not
Step left or right at random, forever, and the walk returns to where it started with certainty. On a grid it also returns. In space it does not, and about a third of walks leave and never come back.
NumberThere is no last prime
Euclid's argument is often described as producing a new prime from any finite list. It does not, and the number it builds is frequently composite — which makes the proof more interesting rather than less.
NumberA fraction that never closes
Euclid's algorithm throws away everything except the number of squares it peeled at each step. Those counts are a second name for the number it started from — one that terminates exactly when the ratio is a ratio.
NumberHow close a fraction can get
Drop eight points into seven boxes and two of them share. That one line, applied to the multiples of an irrational number, proves that every irrational has infinitely many astonishingly good rational approximations — and no construction is needed anywhere.
NumberThe square that cannot shrink
The usual proof that the square root of two is irrational is about even and odd numbers. There is a proof about squares instead, in which a supposed solution is folded into a smaller one — and the folding is a drawing.
LogicAn infinite tree has an infinite path
A tree that goes on forever, in which every node has only finitely many children, must contain a single branch that goes on forever. The proof is a rule for walking, and the rule is the whole of why finite information can decide an infinite question.
LogicThe row that is not on the list
Write down a list of infinite sequences, any list at all, and there is a rule that builds a sequence missing from it. The rule reads one entry from each row, and it is the single most reused argument in this field.
LogicTwo injections make a bijection
If each of two collections fits inside the other without collisions, they are the same size. That sounds obvious and is not, because neither injection needs to be onto — and the proof is a rule for deciding which of the two to follow, one chain at a time.