Concept

Exact arithmetic

Computation carried out in whole numbers or fractions, with no rounding anywhere. It is what a claim of strict inequality requires, because an arithmetic that has already rounded a quantity to the edge of an interval cannot say whether it was strictly inside.

Named by 8 essays across 6 fields — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.

The tail that would have to be a whole number. For each denominator, the value of q! times the tail of the series for e, plotted against the band between zero and one where no whole number lies, with the bound 1/q above it.

A tail too small to be a whole number

If e were a fraction with denominator q, then q! times e would be a whole number. It splits into a whole part and a tail, the tail is squeezed strictly between nothing and one, and there is no whole number there.

number · Irrationality
The orbit a computer draws, and the orbit. Two orbits of the tent map from the same starting fraction plotted against the step number — one computed exactly in whole-number arithmetic and periodic, one computed in double precision and reaching zero.

The orbit a computer draws

A chaotic orbit computed in floating point is not the orbit of the point it started from. Sometimes it is the true orbit of a nearby point, which is enough; sometimes the arithmetic simply runs out, and the picture is of the rounding.

dynamics · Iteration
Counting the real roots of x⁵ − 5x³ + x² + 3x − 1 with Euclid's algorithm. Above, the graph of a polynomial over an interval with its real roots marked; below, a step function counting sign changes in the polynomial's Sturm chain, which drops by one at each root; beside them the chain of polynomials listed.

The remainders that count the roots

Run Euclid's algorithm on a polynomial and its derivative, flipping the sign of each remainder, and write down the signs of the whole chain at any point. The number of sign changes drops by exactly one each time the point passes a real root — so the roots in any interval can be counted, exactly, without finding a single one.

geometry · Euclidean algorithm
Six thirtieths of a turn that add to nothing. On the left a unit circle with the roots of unity in a vanishing sum marked and coloured by origin; on the right the same unit vectors placed head to tail, returning to their start.

The sums of roots of unity that add to nothing

All n of the n-th roots of unity add to zero, and so does any regular polygon among them, turned. Those are not the only vanishing sums: six thirtieths of a turn close into a loop with no polygon in them. Which counts of roots can close at all is decided by the prime factors of n — no seven fifteenths ever add to zero — and the same question counts where the diagonals of a regular polygon cross.

algebra · Roots of unity
The proof of Descartes' rule, one term at a time. Four stacked graphs: a four-term polynomial with three positive roots, and the three polynomials obtained by dividing out a power of x and differentiating, each with one fewer term, one fewer sign change and one fewer positive root.

What the signs allow

Descartes' rule reads the signs of a polynomial's coefficients and bounds its positive roots by how often they change — a bound set by the number of terms, not the degree, and proved by nothing more than Rolle's theorem. Each count the rule allows can be had. But not every pair of counts, positive and negative, that the rule allows together can be had together: the first combination that never occurs is at degree four, and the list of impossible ones is still being worked out.

geometry · Euclidean algorithm
One form completed three ways, and the same straddle each time. The plane coloured by the sign of 2x² + 6xy + 3y². Three pairs of lines, one for completing with x first, one for y first and one along the eigenvectors; their coefficients are 2 and −3/2; 3 and −1; 5.541 and −0.541, and every pair has one line in a positive wedge and one in a negative wedge.

The signs no completion can change

A quadratic in several variables can be completed square by square in many orders, and each order hands back different coefficients. What no order changes is how many come out positive and how many negative — and that count, read off a completion of A − tI, says how many eigenvalues lie below t without finding a single one.

algebra · Completing the square
Strings that overlap themselves leave more behind. 00: 253.293; 01: 230.283; 02: 230.299; 03: 230.315; 04: 230.330; 05: 230.345; 06: 230.361; 07: 230.376; 08: 230.390; 09: 230.405; 10: 220.887; 11: 244.784; 12: 222.442; 13: 223.049; 14: 223.575; 15: 224.033; 16: 224.438; 17: 224.798; 18: 225.120; 19: 225.410; 20: 225.673; 21: 225.913; 22: 249.163; 23: 226.334; 24: 226.520; 25: 226.692; 26: 226.852; 27: 227.001; 28: 227.140; 29: 227.270; 30: 227.393; 31: 227.508; 32: 227.617; 33: 250.747; 34: 227.817; 35: 227.910; 36: 227.998; 37: 228.081; 38: 228.161; 39: 228.237; 40: 228.310; 41: 228.380; 42: 228.446; 43: 228.510; 44: 251.598; 45: 228.631; 46: 228.688; 47: 228.743; 48: 228.796; 49: 228.847; 50: 228.896; 51: 228.944; 52: 228.990; 53: 229.035; 54: 229.078; 55: 252.146; 56: 229.161; 57: 229.201; 58: 229.239; 59: 229.277; 60: 229.313; 61: 229.348; 62: 229.383; 63: 229.416; 64: 229.449; 65: 229.481; 66: 252.538; 67: 229.543; 68: 229.572; 69: 229.601; 70: 229.630; 71: 229.657; 72: 229.684; 73: 229.711; 74: 229.737; 75: 229.762; 76: 229.787; 77: 252.837; 78: 229.835; 79: 229.859; 80: 229.882; 81: 229.904; 82: 229.927; 83: 229.948; 84: 229.970; 85: 229.991; 86: 230.011; 87: 230.031; 88: 253.077; 89: 230.071; 90: 230.090; 91: 230.109; 92: 230.128; 93: 230.146; 94: 230.164; 95: 230.182; 96: 230.199; 97: 230.216; 98: 230.233; 99: 253.275.

What a missing string of digits leaves behind

Strike from the harmonic series every term whose denominator contains 42 and the rest adds up to 228.45. Strike out 99 instead and it adds up to 253.28. The difference is not about which numbers are lost but about waiting: 99 overlaps itself, so it takes 110 random digits on average to turn up where 42 takes 100, and the sum is almost exactly ln 10 times that wait.

analysis · Harmonic series
Two hundred and three points from two. After two rounds: 203 points, 11 rational, 76 in ℚ(√3) but not rational, 116 needing a new square root (√2: 20, √5: 22, √7: 14, √11: 36, √13: 20, √35: 4); 10 lines and 16 circles in the second round.

What two points build in two rounds

Start with two points and draw every line and circle they allow; mark every crossing; do it again. The first round gives six points, the second gives 203, and the third gives over 1.7 billion. Computed exactly, the 203 points show the tower of square roots growing in real time — eleven rational points, seventy-six that need √3, and the rest needing one of six new square roots.

computation · Constructible numbers

Named alongside it

The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.

Exhaustive searchConvergence rateDerivativeEigenvalueGeometric seriesPolynomialRootsSignBinary expansionBisectionClosureCompass and straightedge

All concepts