Commitment
Named by 2 essays across one field — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.
Worth more for being seen first
Moving first sounds like a disadvantage, since the other side gets to see the move and answer it. When the move is a mixture that is announced and believed, it is never a disadvantage, it is worth exactly nothing in a game of pure conflict, and in other games it is worth more than any equilibrium — sometimes by announcing an action that would never be played in secret.
Patience instead of a contract
Commitment had to assume an announcement binds. Play the same game again tomorrow and the assumption is unnecessary — the future does the binding. What it costs is that nearly every outcome becomes an equilibrium, so a theory that could not choose between two now cannot choose between infinitely many.
Named alongside it
The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.
Best replyEquilibrium selectionMinimaxMixed strategyNash equilibriumZero-sum gameConvexityDominant strategy