Convexity
Named by 36 essays across 8 fields — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.
Why the list of perfect solids stops at five
There are infinitely many regular polygons and exactly five regular solids. The reason is not deep, but it is very sharp, and it can be checked on a single row of corners.
Round is not the only way to be the same width
A shape that measures the same in every direction sounds like a description of a circle. It is not — there are infinitely many others, one of them is on a coin in most people's pockets, and a drill built from one cuts a nearly square hole.
One sequence, counting everything
The number of ways to cut a polygon into triangles is 1, 2, 5, 14, 42. So is the number of ways to bracket a product, the number of binary trees, and the number of paths that never cross a diagonal. They are the same count, and the reason is one picture.
The plane, divided by whoever is nearest
Scatter some points and colour every other point of the plane by which one is closest. The result is a tiling nobody designed, and its dual triangulation has a property that no part of the construction mentions.
Four circles cannot do it
Three overlapping circles cut the plane into exactly the eight regions three sets need. Four circles cut it into fourteen, and sixteen are required — so the diagram everyone draws stops working at four, and the reason is a count.
Two numbers that have to meet
Every linear program has a shadow — a second program built from the same numbers read the other way, whose minimum can never fall below the first's maximum. That much is a one-line calculation; the theorem is that the two numbers are always exactly equal.
What a constraint is worth
A linear program and its dual reach the same number. What the dual's variables are is a separate question, and the answer converts a solution into a rate for every constraint — piecewise constant, zero on the constraints that are not doing any work.
The value from both sides
Two choosers move at the same instant, and each asks the cautious question — how much can be guaranteed, whatever the other does. With pure choices the two answers are usually different numbers; allow a probability and they are forced to be the same one.
The road that makes everyone later
An equilibrium is a state nobody can improve alone, which is a much weaker thing than a state anybody would choose. Adding a link that costs nothing to use makes every traveller in this network strictly slower, and the arithmetic says by exactly how much.
The most area a fence can hold
One length of boundary, and the question of what shape to bend it into. The answer is a circle, everybody knows it, and the argument that convinced the nineteenth century turned out to prove something slightly different.
Circles that are diamonds and squares
The theorem hands over a formula for distance. Take the formula as a definition, change the exponent in it, and the set of points one unit from the origin stops being round — while remaining, in every sense that matters, a circle.
A lottery over whole assignments
A table of shares in which every person's shares add to one task and every task is exactly covered is never anything more than a mixture of whole assignments — and finding the mixture is a matter of taking one complete assignment out at a time.
The curve of the average, and the average of the curve
A curve that bends upwards keeps every one of its chords above it. That single fact, applied to a weighted average instead of a midpoint, turns into an inequality that produces the arithmetic–geometric mean inequality, Cauchy–Schwarz and the entropy bound as special cases.
One point in every big enough shape
A determinant measures a lattice, not the basis that happened to describe it — and that measurement is an exchange rate. Any symmetric convex region with more than four times that area has to swallow a lattice point.
One dimension up, and the circles disappear
The Delaunay triangulation is defined by a condition about circles, which is awkward to compute and awkward to reason about. Lift every point onto a paraboloid and the circles turn into planes, the condition turns into convexity, and a two-dimensional problem is solved by looking at a three-dimensional shape from underneath.
Every site in the middle of its own cell
Move each point to the centre of mass of its own Voronoi cell, then redraw the diagram, then do it again. The rule is two lines long, it never mentions hexagons, and what it settles into is a honeycomb.
When the sites are not the same size
Give every site a weight and the boundaries slide. The cells stay convex and the edges stay straight, which is surprising, and one thing happens that the unweighted diagram never allows — a site can end up owning nothing at all.
The shape described from outside
A convex shape can be given by its boundary or by the family of lines that touch it, and the second description turns the constant-width condition into one line of arithmetic — after which the perimeter falls out, and curves with no corners at all can simply be written down.
The corners are whole assignments
A table of shares can be written as a lottery over whole assignments, which one worked example shows. The general statement is that the corners of the set of such tables are exactly the whole assignments, and that single fact is why the whole subject is easy.
One table, two lotteries
A table of shares says what fraction of each task each person does. It does not say how — the same table is a mixture of whole assignments in many different ways, and the differences are exactly what the people being assigned would care about.
A line under every point
The chord above the curve is one definition of convexity. There is a second — a line under the curve at every point, staying under everywhere — and it is the one that turns a statement about a derivative at a point into a statement about the whole function.
The function seen from its tangents
A convex function is the upper envelope of its own tangent lines, so it can be described by giving, for each slope, how far the line of that slope has to be pushed down. That description is a second function, and applying the construction twice returns the original.
Where the guarantee stops
Convexity converts every downhill method into a correct one, and its absence removes the guarantee entirely rather than degrading it. What is left is a collection of partial answers, and knowing which of them apply to a given problem is most of what non-convex optimisation is.
Three points, however many there are
A point inside the hull of a thousand points is inside the hull of three of them. Any four points split into two groups whose hulls meet. And a family of convex sets, every three of which have a common point, has one common to all — three, in each case, being one more than the dimension.
A wall between two bodies
Two convex sets that do not meet can be told apart by a single straight line, and the line is a certificate — one object, checkable in a moment, proving something about every point of both. Remove convexity from either and no line exists, which is what the hypothesis was for.
The least area a width can hold
Barbier's theorem says every curve of constant width has the same perimeter, which removes perimeter as a way of telling the family apart. Area is not like that — the circle holds the most and the Reuleaux triangle the least — and the reason the minimiser has corners is a constraint rather than a preference.
Half a circle against a wall
Lay a fence of fixed length with both ends against a straight wall and the best shape is a half-circle, holding exactly twice what a full circle of the same fence holds. The proof is a mirror: doubled in the wall, any fence becomes a closed curve with twice the length and twice the area, and the closed-curve answer carries over. In a corner the same mirrors give a slice of a circle — until the corner's angle stops dividing a half-turn.
Nearly the most means nearly round
A shape that holds almost as much as a circle of the same perimeter must almost be a circle. Bonnesen made that exact: the ring between a convex shape's largest inscribed circle and smallest enclosing circle is never wider than √(L² − 4πA)/π. Three quite different shapes holding 99% of the circle's area all have rings under 9.55 wide, and not one of 200 random convex shapes breaks the bound.
Patience instead of a contract
Commitment had to assume an announcement binds. Play the same game again tomorrow and the assumption is unnecessary — the future does the binding. What it costs is that nearly every outcome becomes an equilibrium, so a theory that could not choose between two now cannot choose between infinitely many.
A map that offers a choice
Brouwer's theorem needs a function, and the object it was most wanted for is not one — a best reply is a whole set whenever a chooser is indifferent. Allow a point to be sent to a set and the fixed point survives, provided the sets are convex, and the convexity is the entire hypothesis.
Any unevenness brings the match sooner
Real birthdays are not spread evenly across the year, and every such departure pushes the famous twenty-three down rather than up. The proof is one move on two days at a time, and what it leaves behind is a single number — the one ecologists use to count species.
The product that makes a division fair
Divide goods to make the total happiness as large as possible and the result can be monstrously unfair; make the least happy person as happy as possible and it can waste. Multiply the people's values together and maximise the product instead, and something unexpected happens — nobody envies anybody when goods can be split, and nobody envies by more than one item when they cannot.
Moves that only ever add edges
Turán's theorem says the densest graph avoiding a complete graph on r + 1 points is the balanced r-part graph. Zykov's proof finds it by a sequence of moves — turn a point into a copy of a better-connected one it is not joined to — each of which adds edges and none of which can create the forbidden clique. A second proof spreads a unit of weight over the points and gets the same bound from a maximum.
The densest graph without a square
Forbid four points joined in a cycle and a graph can keep only about ½n^(3/2) of its edges — far fewer than the quarter of all pairs a triangle-free graph keeps. Counting pairs of neighbours proves the ceiling in two lines. What reaches it is not a random graph but a finite geometry: the points of a projective plane, joined when they are orthogonal.
When one of the two numbers is missing
The duality theorem is usually quoted as an equality: a linear program and its dual reach the same number. That is one of four cases. A program can run away to infinity, or have no feasible point at all, and then its dual is forced into a matching failure. Every small program with coefficients from minus one to one has been classified, and the table has exactly four occupied cells out of nine.
The lines the optimum lies under
Change the resources a linear program is given and its best value changes too, tracing a graph. Every solution of the dual is a straight line lying above that graph, and the graph is exactly the lowest of those lines — a bent roof of finitely many planks. Require the answer to be in whole numbers and the roof stays where it was while the graph falls away beneath it in steps, and the space between is the part of the problem no price can see.
Named alongside it
The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.
DualityLinear programAreaCircleConvex hullExistence proofConstant widthOptimisationReuleaux triangleSupporting lineTilingVoronoi diagram