Concept

Self-reference

A statement or object that describes itself, usually by way of a numbering that lets it be named inside its own system. It is what makes a sentence able to talk about its own provability, and it is the engine of the incompleteness and halting arguments alike.

Named by 6 essays across one field — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.

The diagonal, and the row built to be off the list. A table of rows of ones and zeros with the diagonal marked, and beneath it the row obtained by flipping every diagonal entry.

The row that is not on the list

Write down a list of infinite sequences, any list at all, and there is a rule that builds a sequence missing from it. The rule reads one entry from each row, and it is the single most reused argument in this field.

logic · Diagonalisation
Does this set contain that one — and the row that is missing. A membership table with the diagonal marked, and beneath it the complement of the diagonal, which is not among the rows.

A list that cannot contain itself

The set of all sets that do not contain themselves is not a set. The argument is the diagonal again, applied to a table whose rows and columns are the same objects, and it destroyed the foundations of mathematics in a postcard.

logic · Diagonalisation
The diagonal, and the row built to be off the list. A table of rows of ones and zeros with the diagonal marked, and beneath it the row obtained by flipping every diagonal entry.

The sentence that says it has no proof

Number every sentence and every proof, and a formal system can talk about itself. Then the diagonal is available one more time, and what it builds is a sentence that is true exactly when it is unprovable.

logic · Diagonalisation
The frames on which provability makes sense, and the two that are refused. Six small frames marked by whether Löb's axiom is valid on them: transitive frames with no cycles accept it, and any frame in which a world can reach itself does not.

Necessity that means provable

Read the box as "the theory proves" and one modal logic stops being a proposal about what necessity might mean. It becomes a complete description of what a formal system can prove about its own proofs — and its frames run forward, compose, and stop.

logic · Modal logic
Adjectives that describe themselves, and the one that cannot exist. A grid of 8 adjectives against the same adjectives as written words, marked where the property holds of the spelling; the diagonal marks self-describing adjectives, and a flipped diagonal row labelled heterological matches no row.

The word that cannot describe itself

Some adjectives describe themselves — 'short' is short — and some do not — 'lengthy' is not lengthy. Call the second kind heterological, and ask whether 'heterological' is heterological. It is exactly when it is not. The diagonal that beat every list of numbers, every set of sets and every provability predicate has been turned on words that describe words, and it proves that no language can contain a word for its own notion of describing, naming or truth.

logic · Diagonalisation
A program whose output is its own text. The 32-character program (f=>f(f))(f=>"(f=>f(f))("+f+")") beside its output, which is identical.

The program that prints itself

The diagonal argument has always been used to destroy — to show that a list misses something, that a sentence cannot be proved. Run the same move the other way and it builds. Kleene's recursion theorem says every program can be given its own text to work with, and the proof is a program that prints itself, thirty-two characters long, which can be run and checked.

logic · Diagonalisation

Named alongside it

The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.

Diagonal argumentFixed pointFormal systemConsistencyCountabilityIncompletenessProvabilityRussell paradoxArithmetisationBijectionCardinalityComprehension

All concepts