Formal system
Named by 3 essays across one field — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.
The sentence that says it has no proof
Number every sentence and every proof, and a formal system can talk about itself. Then the diagonal is available one more time, and what it builds is a sentence that is true exactly when it is unprovable.
Necessity that means provable
Read the box as "the theory proves" and one modal logic stops being a proposal about what necessity might mean. It becomes a complete description of what a formal system can prove about its own proofs — and its frames run forward, compose, and stop.
The word that cannot describe itself
Some adjectives describe themselves — 'short' is short — and some do not — 'lengthy' is not lengthy. Call the second kind heterological, and ask whether 'heterological' is heterological. It is exactly when it is not. The diagonal that beat every list of numbers, every set of sets and every provability predicate has been turned on words that describe words, and it proves that no language can contain a word for its own notion of describing, naming or truth.
Named alongside it
The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.
Fixed pointSelf-referenceDiagonal argumentIncompletenessProvabilityArithmetisationConsistencyCountabilityDefinabilityFrameKripke modelModal logic