Incompleteness
Named by 3 essays across one field — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.
The sentence that says it has no proof
Number every sentence and every proof, and a formal system can talk about itself. Then the diagonal is available one more time, and what it builds is a sentence that is true exactly when it is unprovable.
Necessity that means provable
Read the box as "the theory proves" and one modal logic stops being a proposal about what necessity might mean. It becomes a complete description of what a formal system can prove about its own proofs — and its frames run forward, compose, and stop.
Arithmetic with addition alone
Over the real numbers, a quantifier's shadow is described by inequalities. Over the whole numbers with addition and multiplication, a shadow can be any set a computer can list. In between lies arithmetic with addition and no multiplication, and there the shadows are always the same kind of thing: a finite exception, then a pattern that repeats. The whole numbers made from coins worth 6, 9 and 20 are every number from 44 on; the squares, which need multiplication, never repeat at all.
Named alongside it
The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.
Fixed pointFormal systemProvabilitySelf-referenceArithmetisationCompletenessConsistencyDecision procedureDiagonal argumentFrameFrobenius numberKripke model