Incompleteness
Named by 4 essays across one field — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.
The sentence that says it has no proof
Number every sentence and every proof, and a formal system can talk about itself. Then the diagonal is available one more time, and what it builds is a sentence that is true exactly when it is unprovable.
Necessity that means provable
Read the box as "the theory proves" and one modal logic stops being a proposal about what necessity might mean. It becomes a complete description of what a formal system can prove about its own proofs — and its frames run forward, compose, and stop.
Arithmetic with addition alone
Over the real numbers, a quantifier's shadow is described by inequalities. Over the whole numbers with addition and multiplication, a shadow can be any set a computer can list. In between lies arithmetic with addition and no multiplication, and there the shadows are always the same kind of thing: a finite exception, then a pattern that repeats. The whole numbers made from coins worth 6, 9 and 20 are every number from 44 on; the squares, which need multiplication, never repeat at all.
The shortest description nobody can certify
A string's complexity is the length of the shortest program that prints it. Counting shows almost every string has no short program, and diagonal arguments show nothing can compute the length, or even prove it large for any single string past a fixed point. All 16,777,216 three-state Turing machines leave only 95 strings on their tapes, and a compressor treats π exactly as it treats random bits.
Named alongside it
The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.
Diagonal argumentFixed pointFormal systemProvabilitySelf-referenceArithmetisationCompletenessConsistencyCounting argumentDecision procedureExhaustive searchFrame