Euler formula
Named by 5 essays across 3 fields — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.
Four circles cannot do it
Three overlapping circles cut the plane into exactly the eight regions three sets need. Four circles cut it into fourteen, and sixteen are required — so the diagram everyone draws stops working at four, and the reason is a count.
Two graphs that will not lie flat
Five points, every pair joined: no matter how the points are placed or how the lines are drawn, two of the lines cross. The proof is not about drawing at all — it counts edges against faces and finds one edge too many.
Two trees, and every edge in exactly one of them
Euler's formula is usually proved by deleting things until nothing is left. There is a better argument that deletes nothing — a tree through the corners and a tree through the faces, which between them use every edge once and can therefore be counted.
Five colours, and a chain that can be followed
The four-colour theorem cannot be checked by a person. The five-colour theorem can, in a page, and the argument that does it is the one Kempe thought had settled four — with the exact step where it fails visible in the picture.
The solid whose corners are triangulations
Take the triangulations of a hexagon as points and join two of them when a single diagonal can be swapped for another. The result is not merely a graph — it is the edge skeleton of a genuine convex polyhedron, with fourteen corners, three square faces and six pentagonal ones.
Named alongside it
The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.
Planar graphGraphGraph colouringPlanarityArrangementAssociativityCatalan numbersChromatic numberClosed curveComplete graphConvex hullConvexity