Graph colouring
Named by 13 essays across 4 fields — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.
Four colours, and a proof nobody can read
Every map on a plane can be coloured with four colours so that no two neighbours match. The statement is understandable by a child, it resisted a century of attempts, and the proof that settled it cannot be checked by a human being.
An infinite tree has an infinite path
A tree that goes on forever, in which every node has only finitely many children, must contain a single branch that goes on forever. The proof is a rule for walking, and the rule is the whole of why finite information can decide an infinite question.
Two graphs that will not lie flat
Five points, every pair joined: no matter how the points are placed or how the lines are drawn, two of the lines cross. The proof is not about drawing at all — it counts edges against faces and finds one edge too many.
Five colours, and a chain that can be followed
The four-colour theorem cannot be checked by a person. The five-colour theorem can, in a page, and the argument that does it is the one Kempe thought had settled four — with the exact step where it fails visible in the picture.
Counting the colourings
Asking whether a graph can be coloured with four colours gives a yes or a no. Asking how many ways there are gives a polynomial — and the polynomial answers the first question, and several others nobody asked.
Seven regions on a doughnut
A map on a torus can need seven colours, and the proof is a picture — seven regions, each sharing a border with all six others. The plane needed a computer and eighty-six years; the harder surface was settled in 1890 by drawing something.
Where the rounding runs out
In two dimensions a table of seats inside every fair share always exists. Add a third family of totals — every district and party split between groups — and it need not. Sixteen halves in a three-by-three-by-three table meet every total, and no whole table does it without a seat where the fair share is nothing, because the halves close a loop of seven.
Five spokes squeezed into K5
The Petersen graph has no point with four neighbours, so no stretched copy of K5 can sit inside it. Contract its five spokes and K5 appears anyway. Kuratowski's theorem forbids stretched copies and Wagner's forbids squeezed ones, the two notions disagree on this graph — and they still name exactly the same planar graphs.
The colours a circle forces
Take every pair from five things and join two pairs when they share nothing. Three colours are enough to colour the result so joined pairs differ, and two are not — but no triangle, no dense cluster and no counting argument explains why. The reason is five points on a circle and a direction that cannot be told apart from its opposite, and the same reason, one sphere at a time, settles Kneser's question for every size.
Several colours on every vertex
Give every pair from six points three colours, so that pairs with nothing in common share no colour. Counting says nine colours might do; ten are needed. Stahl conjectured in 1976 exactly how many colours every such problem needs — a formula that meets Lovász's topological answer at one colour a vertex and the obvious answer at k — and a search over stars and triangles confirms it in every case small enough to run.
The order decides the colours
The simplest way to colour a graph is to take the vertices one at a time and give each the first colour its neighbours are not already using. It never needs more than one colour beyond the largest degree — and on a graph that needs only two colours it can be made to use as many as there are vertices on a side, depending on nothing but the order it is handed.
How many colours the plane needs
Colour every point of the plane so that no two points exactly one unit apart share a colour. Seven colours are enough, by a tiling with hexagons, and four are necessary, by a graph of seven points. For sixty-eight years nothing better was known on either side; then in 2018 a graph of 1,581 points showed four is not enough — and the answer is still somewhere from five to seven.
The fewest corners a surface needs
Build a closed surface from triangles, any two meeting along a whole edge, at a single corner or not at all, and ask for the fewest corners. Two lines of counting give a floor for every surface, in terms of its Euler characteristic alone. The torus meets it with seven, the projective plane with six — and the Klein bottle, which the counting says could be built from seven, cannot, as a search of every possible arrangement shows.
Named alongside it
The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.
Chromatic numberExhaustive searchPlanar graphComplete graphPlanarityEuler characteristicEuler formulaAntipodal pairCompactnessCounterexampleExistence proofGenus