Graph colouring
Named by 6 essays across 2 fields — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.
Four colours, and a proof nobody can read
Every map on a plane can be coloured with four colours so that no two neighbours match. The statement is understandable by a child, it resisted a century of attempts, and the proof that settled it cannot be checked by a human being.
An infinite tree has an infinite path
A tree that goes on forever, in which every node has only finitely many children, must contain a single branch that goes on forever. The proof is a rule for walking, and the rule is the whole of why finite information can decide an infinite question.
Two graphs that will not lie flat
Five points, every pair joined: no matter how the points are placed or how the lines are drawn, two of the lines cross. The proof is not about drawing at all — it counts edges against faces and finds one edge too many.
Five colours, and a chain that can be followed
The four-colour theorem cannot be checked by a person. The five-colour theorem can, in a page, and the argument that does it is the one Kempe thought had settled four — with the exact step where it fails visible in the picture.
Counting the colourings
Asking whether a graph can be coloured with four colours gives a yes or a no. Asking how many ways there are gives a polynomial — and the polynomial answers the first question, and several others nobody asked.
Seven regions on a doughnut
A map on a torus can need seven colours, and the proof is a picture — seven regions, each sharing a border with all six others. The plane needed a computer and eighty-six years; the harder surface was settled in 1890 by drawing something.
Named alongside it
The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.
Chromatic numberPlanar graphPlanarityComplete graphEuler characteristicEuler formulaGraphChromatic polynomialCompactnessComputer-assisted proofCounterexampleCounting