Planar graph
Named by 9 essays across 3 fields — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.
Four colours, and a proof nobody can read
Every map on a plane can be coloured with four colours so that no two neighbours match. The statement is understandable by a child, it resisted a century of attempts, and the proof that settled it cannot be checked by a human being.
Every corner pays for itself
Count the corners of any solid, subtract the edges, add the faces. The answer is two. It is two for a cube, for a pyramid, for a football, for anything squashed or stretched — and the number is measuring the shape it is wrapped around rather than the shape itself.
The plane, divided by whoever is nearest
Scatter some points and colour every other point of the plane by which one is closest. The result is a tiling nobody designed, and its dual triangulation has a property that no part of the construction mentions.
Two graphs that will not lie flat
Five points, every pair joined: no matter how the points are placed or how the lines are drawn, two of the lines cross. The proof is not about drawing at all — it counts edges against faces and finds one edge too many.
Two trees, and every edge in exactly one of them
Euler's formula is usually proved by deleting things until nothing is left. There is a better argument that deletes nothing — a tree through the corners and a tree through the faces, which between them use every edge once and can therefore be counted.
Five colours, and a chain that can be followed
The four-colour theorem cannot be checked by a person. The five-colour theorem can, in a page, and the argument that does it is the one Kempe thought had settled four — with the exact step where it fails visible in the picture.
The tree inside the triangulation
The shortest network joining a set of points is built from edges chosen by length, and the triangulation is built from edges chosen by an emptiness condition about circles. The two constructions share no step, and every edge of the first is an edge of the second.
Five spokes squeezed into K5
The Petersen graph has no point with four neighbours, so no stretched copy of K5 can sit inside it. Contract its five spokes and K5 appears anyway. Kuratowski's theorem forbids stretched copies and Wagner's forbids squeezed ones, the two notions disagree on this graph — and they still name exactly the same planar graphs.
The few points that cut a flat graph
Any graph that can be drawn without crossings, however large, falls into pieces of at most two thirds once a few points are removed — about the square root of its size, never more than 2.83 times it. A grid shows the square root cannot be beaten, a ring of breadth-first neighbours comes close, and a cycle through a shallow tree finishes the job.
Named alongside it
The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.
Euler formulaGraphPlanarityEuler characteristicGraph colouringChromatic numberComplete graphDelaunay triangulationSpanning treeSubdivisionTopological invariantVoronoi diagram