Drift — where it appears
Named by 2 essays across 2 fields — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.
The heuristic that cannot be a proof
There is a two-line argument that the Collatz conjecture is true, it is convincing, and everybody who works on the problem believes it. It also cannot be turned into a proof, and understanding exactly where it fails is more instructive than the argument itself.
Two losing games that win together
Game A is a coin that wins 49.5% of the time. Game B tosses a bad coin when the capital is a multiple of three and a good one otherwise, and it loses too, because the capital spends more than a third of its time on multiples of three. Choose between the two games at random and the walk drifts upwards by 0.0157 a round; play A, B, B over and over and it gains 0.0574. Nothing is wrong with the arithmetic. The losing coin A wins by knocking the capital off the bad remainder.
Named alongside it
The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.
Random walkCollatzExpectationExpected valueHeuristicIterationLogarithmMarkov chainParadoxPeriodicityProofStationary distribution