Correlated equilibrium
Named by 3 essays across one field — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.
A signal both can see
Two choosers who randomise privately can reach a set of outcomes that is smaller, and worse, than the set they reach when a device draws one cell and whispers each of them their half of it. Nothing is enforced and nobody is bound, and the arrangement is stable anyway.
A signal both can see
Two choosers who randomise privately can reach a set of outcomes that is smaller, and worse, than the set they reach when a device draws one cell and whispers each of them their half of it. Nothing is enforced and nobody is bound, and the arrangement is stable anyway.
Two equilibria and no way to choose
A game can have two states nobody wants to leave, one paying more than the other, and the definition of an equilibrium has nothing to say about which happens. The two standard tie-breakers disagree, and the one that wins is usually the worse.
Named alongside it
The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.
Best replyConditional probabilityMixed strategyNash equilibriumExhaustive searchLinear programZero-sum gameCongestionEquilibrium selectionExistence proofPotential function