Attractor
Named by 5 essays across one field — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.
The staircase that shows the whole orbit
Take a number, feed it to a rule, feed the answer back in. There is a way of drawing that on the rule's own graph which turns the entire future of a starting point into a shape — and the shape is legible.
The road paved with doublings
Turn one dial slowly and watch what a map settles into. It settles on a point, then on two points, then four, then eight — faster and faster, and the doublings run out at a parameter that is finite.
Two lobes and no cycle
Three equations, three variables, and a trajectory that never crosses itself, never repeats, and never leaves a region of zero volume. The set it settles onto is not a point, not a loop, and not a surface.
A dimension that is not a whole number
Cover a set with boxes of side ε and count how many are needed. For a line the count grows like 1/ε, for a region like 1/ε². For the Koch curve it grows like 1/ε to the power 1.26, and that exponent is as good a definition of dimension as the other two.
A dimension from the stretching rates
An attractor has no construction rule, so its dimension has to be counted — that was the rung below's argument for defining dimension by counting at all. Kaplan and Yorke's formula computes it instead, from two numbers that describe the map and never look at the set.
Named alongside it
The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.
Self-similarityBifurcationBox dimensionDissipationFixed pointIterated function systemLogistic mapOrbitPeriodic orbitScalingSensitive dependenceTransient