pythagoras
pythagoras is one function. Everything below came out of it during this
build, at parameters taken from the essays rather than invented for this page — so a figure
here is the same figure a reader meets in an essay, and if the generator changes, this page
changes with it.
At its defaults
What it checks while it draws
Collected by running the family and listening to lib/verify.js, not written
here. The count is how many separate times this build put that claim to the test.
- and half the rectangle — same base, apex on the parallel through the altitude ×1
- four triangles and the tilted square fill the left square ×1
- four triangles and the two upright squares fill the right square ×1
- so the square and the rectangle are equal ×1
- the altitude cuts the big square into exactly these two rectangles ×1
- the angle at C is a right angle ×1
- the eight triangles are all the same ×1
- the long leg is b ×1
- the short leg is a ×1
- the square on the hypotenuse is c² ×1
- the square on the leg has the leg's area squared ×1
- the tilted square equals the two upright squares ×1
- the tilted square is c² ×1
- the triangle is half the square — same base, apex on the opposite side ×1
- the two triangles are the same triangle turned ×1
Where it is called
Changing this generator changes every figure on this list. That is what makes the list worth publishing rather than keeping in a check script.
Euclid proves it without moving anything
The rearrangement proof cuts and slides. Euclid's does neither — it shows that a square and a rectangle are each exactly twice the same triangle, seen from opposite sides, and that is harder to hold in the head for a reason worth understanding.
NumberEvery triple, on one circle
Draw a line of rational slope through a single point of a circle. Wherever it comes out is a rational point, and clearing the denominators turns it into a Pythagorean triple — so every triple there is comes from one line through one point.
GeometryTwo squares, four triangles, and no algebra
The Pythagorean theorem is usually met as a formula to be memorised. It is much better met as a rearrangement that can be checked by eye.