Reuleaux triangle
Named by 5 essays across one field — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.
Round is not the only way to be the same width
A shape that measures the same in every direction sounds like a description of a circle. It is not — there are infinitely many others, one of them is on a coin in most people's pockets, and a drill built from one cuts a nearly square hole.
The most area a fence can hold
One length of boundary, and the question of what shape to bend it into. The answer is a circle, everybody knows it, and the argument that convinced the nineteenth century turned out to prove something slightly different.
The least area a width can hold
Barbier's theorem says every curve of constant width has the same perimeter, which removes perimeter as a way of telling the family apart. Area is not like that — the circle holds the most and the Reuleaux triangle the least — and the reason the minimiser has corners is a constraint rather than a preference.
The same question in space
Intersect four balls at the corners of a tetrahedron and the result is not of constant width — it misses by two and a half per cent, computed exactly. Repairing it gives a body that is, and whether that body is the smallest of its kind has been open for a century.
Nearly the most means nearly round
A shape that holds almost as much as a circle of the same perimeter must almost be a circle. Bonnesen made that exact: the ring between a convex shape's largest inscribed circle and smallest enclosing circle is never wider than √(L² − 4πA)/π. Three quite different shapes holding 99% of the circle's area all have rings under 9.55 wide, and not one of 200 random convex shapes breaks the bound.
Named alongside it
The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.
Constant widthConvexityAreaSupport functionCircleIntegral geometryOptimalityBarbier's theoremConvex hullEigenvalueEllipseExistence proof