Equivalence relation
Named by 4 essays across 3 fields — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.
A set that has no size at all
Slide the unit interval along itself by every rational and the points fall into classes. Choose one point from each and the resulting set has no length — not zero, not positive, none: countably many disjoint copies of it would have total length nought or infinity, and the union needs something in between.
Two diagrams the language cannot tell apart
A modal formula sees a diagram of worlds and arrows through a very narrow window. Exactly how narrow is settled by a game: where one player can answer every move, no formula whatever separates the two starting worlds, however different the diagrams look.
The group a space has at a point
The loops of a space form a group once a starting point is fixed, and the fixing looks like an arbitrary choice that ought to be removable. It is removable, but only up to conjugation, and the residue is exactly what makes a non-commutative fundamental group harder to state than to compute.
How many worlds a formula can need
A modal formula can be true in a model with infinitely many worlds. It can also be true in a small one — and the small one is built from the large one by throwing away every distinction the formula was never able to make.
Named alongside it
The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.
BisimulationDecision procedureKripke modelModal logicAccessibilityAxiom of choiceBase pointCompletenessConjugacyContradictionCountabilityDense set