Equidistribution
Named by 14 essays across 5 fields — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.
Three gaps and no more
Turn a circle by the same irrational angle over and over. The points never repeat and never settle, and yet at every single stage the gaps they leave take at most three different lengths — never four, at any number of steps, for any angle.
A bounce is a fold of the table
Reflect the room instead of the ball and every bounce disappears — the trajectory becomes a straight line through a tiled plane, and questions about what a ball does forever become questions about the slope of that line.
Points too even to be random
Independent random points clump, and the clumping is what makes the error fall only as the square root. Points chosen to be evenly spread rather than independently beat that rate, and the price is that nothing about them is random at all.
A table folded into a surface
Unfolding a square billiard gives a straight line on a torus. Unfolding any table whose angles are whole fractions of half a turn gives a straight line on some surface — and which surface it is decides how hard the dynamics will be.
Nineteen thousand bits of state
The generator most simulations actually use is not clever. It is a linear recurrence over the two-element field with an enormous state, and its virtues are a proved period, a proved equidistribution and speed — none of which is unpredictability, which it does not have and does not claim.
When two circular motions come home
Drive a point across with one sine wave and up and down with another. If the two frequencies are in a whole-number ratio the point retraces a closed figure whose crossings can be counted in advance — 2pq − p − q of them — and if they are not, it never comes back and fills the square, spending twenty times longer in the corners than in the middle.
A filter that changes only the spread
The generator most simulations use passes every output through a last scrambling step before anyone sees it. The step is reversible, it changes nothing about the period, and it cannot make the generator any less predictable. What it changes is which patterns of consecutive outputs can occur at all — on a small twisted generator, from half of them to every one.
How evenly the fractions spread
List every fraction between nought and one with denominator at most n, in order. They spread across the interval almost evenly, and how fast the unevenness shrinks as n grows is — exactly, provably — the Riemann hypothesis. The link runs through a second fact: set the fractions round a circle and add them as arrows, and what is left is a whole number.
Is the partition count even half the time?
The number of partitions of n is even for 50.0% of the n up to half a million, its runs of one parity are as long as a coin's, and nothing proves that the share is a half — the best theorems only show there are at least about √n of each. Modulo 5 and 7 the zeros carry Ramanujan's congruences and something more: an excess that follows whether 1 − 24n is a square.
Multiplying makes the digit one common
Multiply a few random numbers together and the product starts with 1 about 30 per cent of the time and with 9 under 5 per cent — Benford's law, which no factor contains. The logarithm of a product is a sum, the central limit theorem spreads that sum across many powers of ten, and once it is spread its fractional part is uniform. The approach is geometric, at a rate fixed by a single number for each kind of factor; sums never get there, and the powers of two get there with no randomness at all.
A rotation that hides the lattice
A congruential generator modulo a power of two has a lowest bit that alternates and pairs of outputs that lie on a few lines. Keep the generator exactly as it is, and show only eight bits of each state, rotated by an amount the state's own top bits choose: every output bit now runs the full cycle, the pairs fill the square as a random sequence would, and triples pass a test the state's own bits fail by a factor of six. Nothing about the state has changed, and four outputs still give it away.
Which way a prime's two squares point
A prime one more than a multiple of four is a sum of two squares in exactly one way, and the two squares make a point on a circle. Draw that point for every such prime and ask which way it faces. It faces every way equally — the angles spread evenly over the sector, which Hecke proved by giving each angle a remainder and copying Dirichlet. Measured over seventy-four thousand primes, they are even more evenly spread than random angles would be.
![Primes in five thousand thin sectors. 581517 primes in (2e7, 4e7] in 4967 sectors; mean 117.08, variance ratio 0.874, 2 empty.](/f/primes-in-five-thousand-thin-sectors-90657fc7.svg)
Sectors that shrink with the primes
Hecke proved that the angles of the primes a² + b² are evenly spread, so every fixed sector eventually gets its share. Let the sector shrink as the primes grow, to width X^(−α), and the question is open beyond small α. Measured on the 581,517 such primes between twenty and forty million, wide shrinking sectors fluctuate far less than chance and thin ones as much as chance — and the thin sectors that go empty are not scattered: they gather beside the directions of small rational slope, most of all slopes like 1/3 and 1/1 whose two terms are both odd.
A share that depends on the average
What share of the whole numbers begin with the digit 1? Counted up to N, the answer swings between one ninth and five ninths for ever, and averaging the swing over N, even three times over, narrows it without removing it. Weight each number n by 1/n instead and the share settles at log₁₀ 2 — Benford's value — and so does every other sensible weighting that counts each decade alike. The primes behave the same way. Benford's law for the counting numbers is not a fact about them; it is a fact about how they are averaged.
Named alongside it
The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.
Irrational rotationPseudorandomnessDiscrepancyLinear recurrencePeriodPrime number theoremBilliardsConvergence rateFinite fieldGaussian integersLatticeLogarithm