Cubic — where it appears
Named by 6 essays across 4 fields — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.
The mark that changes what is reachable
Two thousand years of failure to trisect an angle with compass and straightedge was failure at a stated set of operations. Scratch two marks on the straightedge and Archimedes trisects any angle in four steps — because the new operation solves a cubic, and the old ones could only ever solve quadratics.
Two instruments with one reach
Allow every conic to be drawn at will, or allow an angle to be cut in three. The two permissions look nothing alike and reach exactly the same numbers — because what an operation buys is a degree, and both of these buy three.
A quintic a sliding mark reaches
The eleven-sided polygon needs a number of degree five, and five is not a product of twos and threes — so no conic and no angle trisector reaches it. A ruler with two scratches does, which places the marked ruler strictly above the conics and leaves its exact reach unknown.
Where two roots run into each other
Put every quadratic equation at a point of a plane, one coordinate per coefficient. Each possible root becomes a straight line there, every one of those lines touches the same parabola, and that parabola is the discriminant — the crease where the plane of roots is folded onto the plane of equations.
A cube root that looks like chance
The continued fraction of √61 repeats after eleven terms, and every square root's must. The cube root of 2 obeys no such law. Computed exactly, by a method of Lagrange's that never leaves the whole numbers, its terms run 1, 3, 1, 5, 1, 1, 4 … and throw up a 534 at the thirty-fifth place and a 7,451 at the 571st — and in every statistic anyone has measured, they look like the terms of a number picked at random.
The sine of one degree
Every table of sines ever made by hand needed the sine of one degree, and no construction with ruler and compass can produce it: one degree is a third of three, and thirds are what the constructions cannot make. Ptolemy fenced it in with an inequality and got it right to the precision his table carried. Thirteen centuries later Jamshīd al-Kāshī wrote the triple-angle formula as a rule for improving a guess and let it run, gaining almost three decimal places at every turn — a cubic solved without Cardano, by doing the same thing again.
Named alongside it
The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.
Constructible numberDegreeField extensionMarked straightedgeNeusisOperation setTrisectionIrreducible polynomialAlgebraic numberAlgorithmChordCobweb