Constructible number
Named by 23 essays across 4 fields — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.
What two points can build
A compass and a straightedge are not a craft. They are two operations on a set of points, applied over and over, and writing them that way turns "can this be drawn?" into a question with an answer.
Every step is a square root
A line meets a line by solving a linear equation and a circle by solving a quadratic one. There is no third case, so the numbers a construction reaches can only ever double in complexity — and a doubling is a thing that can be counted.
The cube that will not double
Doubling a cube needs an edge in the ratio of the cube root of two. That number satisfies an equation of degree three, three does not divide any power of two, and the oldest open problem in geometry closes in a line.
The angle that will not divide by three
Halving an angle costs one circle. Cutting it in three means solving a cubic, and for sixty degrees that cubic has no rational root — but plenty of angles do trisect, and which ones is a question with a countable answer.
Which polygons can be drawn
Three sides yes, seven no, seventeen yes. The list of constructible regular polygons is neither everything nor almost nothing, and the pattern in it is a fact about which numbers are one less than a power of two.
The circle that will not square
The other three impossibilities are a number having the wrong degree. This one is a number having no degree at all — and that is a claim no finite search can establish, which makes it the one place in this field where the picture has to admit what it is not doing.
A tower whose degrees multiply
Treat a field containing another as a vector space over it, and the size of an extension becomes a dimension — one that multiplies along a tower, so that three impossible constructions become arithmetic about which numbers divide which.
The straightedge buys nothing
Every point a compass and a straightedge can construct together can be constructed by the compass alone. The straightedge draws lines nobody needs; the compass does the work, and the proof that it does is an inversion performed with arcs.
The mark that changes what is reachable
Two thousand years of failure to trisect an angle with compass and straightedge was failure at a stated set of operations. Scratch two marks on the straightedge and Archimedes trisects any angle in four steps — because the new operation solves a cubic, and the old ones could only ever solve quadratics.
One circle, and a straightedge
A straightedge alone cannot bisect a segment, so it cannot draw a parallel, so it can construct almost nothing. Draw one circle anywhere and mark its centre and everything a compass could ever have done becomes available — the circle is never needed again.
The compass that will not open
Fix the compass at one opening and never change it. That looks like a serious loss — a circle of a given radius through a given point is the compass's whole job — and it turns out to cost nothing at all, for reasons that are arithmetic rather than geometric.
Two instruments with one reach
Allow every conic to be drawn at will, or allow an angle to be cut in three. The two permissions look nothing alike and reach exactly the same numbers — because what an operation buys is a degree, and both of these buy three.
A quintic a sliding mark reaches
The eleven-sided polygon needs a number of degree five, and five is not a product of twos and threes — so no conic and no angle trisector reaches it. A ruler with two scratches does, which places the marked ruler strictly above the conics and leaves its exact reach unknown.
A curve that divides any angle
Let a radius turn at a steady rate while a horizontal line falls at a steady rate, both finishing together, and mark where they cross. The curve they trace turns heights into angles, so dividing a height — which a ruler and compass can always do — divides the angle in the same ratio. The same curve meets its base at 2/π of the side, a length from which a square with the area of a circle follows. It reaches what no marked ruler or conic can, and the ancient objection to it is exact.
The lengths dividers cannot reach
A pair of dividers carries a length from one place to another and draws nothing. With a straightedge it finds midpoints, parallels and right angles, and it draws the regular 17-gon. It cannot draw a segment of length √(1 + √2) — and the reason is not on the page at all, but in the other root of the equation that number solves.
The sums that obey a smaller equation
The twelve non-trivial thirteenth roots of unity satisfy an equation of degree twelve. Split them into three groups of four — the right three groups — and add each group: the three sums are the roots of x³ + x² − 4x + 1, an equation of degree three with whole-number coefficients. Gauss called such sums periods, found one for every divisor of p − 1, and used them to build the seventeen-gon from four quadratic equations.
The spiral that measures its own circle
Let a ray turn steadily while a point moves steadily out along it, and the point draws Archimedes' spiral. Distance from the centre is then proportional to angle, so dividing a length divides an angle in any ratio. The spiral's second power is stranger: the tangent at the end of the first turn cuts off, on a line through the centre, a straight length exactly equal to the circumference of the circle through that end — a curved length laid out straight, and with it the circle squared. The catch is the tangent itself.
A third reached only in the limit
No compass-and-straightedge construction trisects every angle. But a quarter, plus a quarter of a quarter, plus a quarter of that, and so on, adds up to a third — and each of those pieces is two bisections away. So an angle can be trisected by bisecting forever, every stage exact and the shortfall shrinking to a quarter each time. The construction never ends, and that is precisely what Wantzel's proof forbids: a construction is a finite thing, and a third of a general angle is only reached in the limit.
Three real roots and no real radicals
The cubic x³ − 3x + 1 has three real roots, and Cardano's formula reaches every one of them by way of the cube roots of a complex number. That detour cannot be removed: Hölder proved in 1891 that no expression built from real radicals gives a root of an irreducible cubic whose roots are all real. The proof is three lines of the Galois correspondence, and its general form says that real radicals reach all-real roots only when square roots alone would.
The five crescents that can be squared
The circle cannot be squared, but some regions bounded by circular arcs can: Hippocrates of Chios found a crescent with exactly the area of a triangle around 440 BC. The trick is to make two multiples of π cancel, and it works for a crescent whose two arcs turn through angles in the ratio m to n exactly when an angle defined by a polynomial can be drawn with ruler and compass. That happens for five ratios and no others.
What two points build in two rounds
Start with two points and draw every line and circle they allow; mark every crossing; do it again. The first round gives six points, the second gives 203, and the third gives over 1.7 billion. Computed exactly, the 203 points show the tower of square roots growing in real time — eleven rational points, seventy-six that need √3, and the rest needing one of six new square roots.
The sine of one degree
Every table of sines ever made by hand needed the sine of one degree, and no construction with ruler and compass can produce it: one degree is a third of three, and thirds are what the constructions cannot make. Ptolemy fenced it in with an inequality and got it right to the precision his table carried. Thirteen centuries later Jamshīd al-Kāshī wrote the triple-angle formula as a rule for improving a guess and let it run, gaining almost three decimal places at every turn — a cubic solved without Cardano, by doing the same thing again.
The slides a compass could have made
Slide a marked ruler through a point until one mark sits on each of two perpendicular lines, and the positions solve a quartic. Usually no compass can find them. Put the point on the bisector and every position is two square roots away, which is why the ancient vergings of a square were plane problems. Off the bisector the dividing line is a cubic with a whole-number root: 18 of 1,694 small slides pass, the point (1, 7) passes at infinitely many lengths, and (1, 2) at none yet found.
Named alongside it
The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.
Field extensionOperation setDegree of an extensionStraightedge and compassIrreducible polynomialTrisectionConstructionCubicDegreeGalois groupMarked straightedgeMinimal polynomial