Congruence
Named by 10 essays across 3 fields — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.
Euclid proves it without moving anything
The rearrangement proof cuts and slides. Euclid's does neither — it shows that a square and a rectangle are each exactly twice the same triangle, seen from opposite sides, and that is harder to hold in the head for a reason worth understanding.
The rope that squares a corner
The theorem turns two sides into a third. Run it backwards and it turns three lengths into a right angle — which is a different statement, needs its own proof, and is the only one of the two that has ever been used to build anything.
Equal area is enough, and equal volume is not
Any two polygons of the same area can be cut into each other with finitely many straight cuts. The same sentence with area replaced by volume and polygon by polyhedron is false, and what blocks it is an angle.
Every fifth one divides
p(4) is 5, p(9) is 30, p(14) is 135, and every partition count at a number leaving four on division by five is divisible by five. Ramanujan read it off a table; the explanation is a way of splitting those partitions into five equal heaps.
Infinitely many of one kind
Euclid's argument produces a prime nobody had listed, and says nothing about what it looks like. Ask for infinitely many primes ending in 3, or leaving a remainder of 1 on division by 4, and the same construction has to be aimed — and for most targets nobody knows how to aim it.
A dissection that never comes apart
The plane theorem lets the pieces be picked up and put down anywhere. Require instead that they stay joined at their corners and swing, and the theorem survives — which was open for a century and is a much stronger statement about the same cuts.
Slid, but never turned
The classical dissections all turn their pieces. Forbid the turn — allow the pieces to be slid and nothing else — and equal area stops being enough, for a reason that is a single number attached to each direction and that a cut cannot change.
Equal area on a sphere, without a rectangle
On a sphere, two polygons of the same area can still be cut into each other, exactly as in the plane. Almost nothing in the plane proof survives the move: a sphere has no rectangles, no parallel strips and no similar triangles of different sizes. What carries the theorem instead is a quadrilateral with two right angles, built from a triangle's midline.
A factorisation that hides its primes
Keep only the whole numbers one more than a multiple of four. They multiply among themselves and nothing is lost — yet 441 is 9 × 49 and also 21 × 21, and every one of those factors is unbreakable there. Unique factorisation turns out not to be a fact about multiplication at all.
Is the partition count even half the time?
The number of partitions of n is even for 50.0% of the n up to half a million, its runs of one parity are as long as a coin's, and nothing proves that the share is a half — the best theorems only show there are at least about √n of each. Modulo 5 and 7 the zeros carry Ramanujan's congruences and something more: an excess that follows whether 1 − 24n is a square.
Named alongside it
The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.
AreaDissectionOperation setPolygonConstructionInvariantModular arithmeticRigid motionDirichlet theoremImpossibilityQuadratic residueUnique factorisation