Things that cannot be done — page 4
An integral that cannot be a whole number
Niven's proof that π is not a fraction is the same squeeze as the one for e, with a much harder multiplier. A polynomial supplies the whole number; its own smallness supplies the contradiction; and both halves are computable.
Approached too fast to be algebraic
An algebraic number of degree d cannot be approached by fractions faster than the denominator's dth power. So a number that is approached faster than that is the root of no polynomial at all — and one can be built by choosing where its decimal digits go.
None of the four conditions is spare
Four conditions pick out one sharing rule. The half that is usually shown is that they are enough; the other half is that each is needed — drop any one and a different rule satisfies the rest, so the list cannot be shortened.
The plane hiding in the squares
A complete family of orthogonal squares is not a collection of squares that happen to agree nowhere. It is a geometry — a plane with n² points in which every two points lie on exactly one line — and reading it that way is how the impossible orders were found.
Sixteen of five hundred and seventy-six
A Latin square is a multiplication table in which every equation has exactly one solution. Ask it to be associative as well and almost every square drops out — sixteen of the five hundred and seventy-six of order four survive, and they are the two groups.
Reached from below, or not at all
Every limit ordinal anybody meets is the end of an increasing sequence — ω, ω·2, ω^ω, all of them approached one step at a time. The first uncountable ordinal is not, and the reason it is not constrains the size of the continuum.
One point in every big enough shape
A determinant measures a lattice, not the basis that happened to describe it — and that measurement is an exchange rate. Any symmetric convex region with more than four times that area has to swallow a lattice point.
The same sum without its minus signs
Delete the signs from the determinant's sum over permutations and what is left counts things directly rather than by cancellation. It is a better count and a far worse object — because the cancellation was what made the determinant computable.
A room that cannot be lit
Mirror the walls of a room and put a lamp inside it. Every point should be lit, since light bounces forever — and there are rooms with a dark spot no ray from the lamp ever reaches.
The triangle nobody can settle
Does every triangular billiard table have a path that closes on itself? Acute triangles do, right triangles do, triangles with rational angles do — and for the rest the question has been open since it was asked.
A curve that has area
The Jordan curve theorem assumes three things and nothing else — continuous, closed, no self-crossing. Everything else the eye supplies is false of some curve that satisfies all three, including the assumption that a curve is thin.
A ball whose outside is not one
Alexander's sphere separates space into two pieces, exactly as the theorem promises. Its inside is an ordinary ball. Its outside is not, and the obstruction is a tree of clasped horns whose tips never stop.
A cycle for every pair
A cyclic sequence in which every window of two consecutive symbols is a different pair of things. For five things it exists and for four it does not, and in both cases there are exactly as many pairs as there are places to put them.
Two out of three, and never all three
Stay inside every region's quota, never take a seat away when the house grows, never take one from a region that grew faster. Each pair is achievable. All three together are not, and the proof is that no rule anywhere manages it.
How many ways to sort it
An order says some things come before others and leaves the rest open. Counting the orderings consistent with it measures how much is still unknown — and the counting is as hard as any counting problem gets.
Which primes a form takes
A prime is the sum of two squares exactly when it is 1 modulo 4. Change the form slightly, to x² + 27y², and no congruence on p decides it at all — which is where the elementary subject ends and its successor begins.
The identity that multiplies sums of squares
A sum of two squares times a sum of two squares is a sum of two squares, and the same is true of four and of eight. It is true of three of nothing: 3 and 5 are each a sum of three squares, 15 is not, and one small pair of numbers rules the case out forever.
What is lost at eight
Double the quaternions and division still works, but ab times c and a times bc are no longer the same number. What survives is a weaker law that turns out to be enough for a great deal — and the whole multiplication table fits into a picture of seven lines.
A set that has no size at all
Slide the unit interval along itself by every rational and the points fall into classes. Choose one point from each and the resulting set has no length — not zero, not positive, none: countably many disjoint copies of it would have total length nought or infinity, and the union needs something in between.
The axiom with no property of the arrows
Each axiom of modal logic can be matched by hand to a condition on the arrows between worlds. There is a recipe that does it for a whole class of axioms, and there is an axiom the recipe cannot reach — not because nobody has looked, but because no condition on the arrows defines it at all.
The theorem that has no version in space
A lattice polygon's area is decided completely by two counts of dots. The obvious guess is that a lattice solid's volume is decided by the same two counts in three dimensions, and there is a family of tetrahedra with identical counts and every volume that says otherwise.
Why the second group commutes
Replace loops by spheres and the same construction gives a second homotopy group. It is always commutative, and the reason is not a fact about spheres or about any space — it is a two-line argument about any set carrying two compatible operations.
Angles survive and areas do not
Stereographic projection takes every circle on the sphere to a circle or a line, and every crossing angle to itself. It does both exactly, with no approximation anywhere, and it destroys area so thoroughly that a patch near the pole can be a thousand times its neighbour's size.
Neither a surface nor a solid
The attractor has no volume, because the flow shrinks volumes at a rate that can be read off the equations. It is also not a surface, because a surface cannot carry chaotic dynamics. What is left is an object of dimension a little over two, and that number is measurable.