Measure zero
Named by 6 essays across 2 fields — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.
Almost none of it left, and still uncountably many
Remove the middle third of an interval, then the middle third of each piece left, and keep going. The lengths removed add to exactly the whole interval, so nothing measurable survives — and what survives can be paired off one for one with every point of the interval that was started with.
Countable, and everywhere
The numbers a polynomial can catch arrive in finite batches, so they can be listed. They are also in every interval, however short. Being listable turns out to say nothing whatever about being sparse.
No interval in it, and length to spare
The middle-thirds set has no length because the removed pieces add to one. Remove shrinking middles instead and they add to a half — leaving a set that still contains no interval anywhere, and still has half the length it started with.
Covering a set from outside
To say how long a set is, cover it with intervals and add their lengths, then take the smallest total any covering achieves. That definition is short, obviously right for an interval, and gives the rationals a length of nothing.
Which functions can be added up
Riemann's integral works when the upper and lower sums close on each other. The exact condition for that, found once measure existed to state it in, is that the points where the function jumps have measure zero — which some nowhere dense sets fail.
A set that has no size at all
Slide the unit interval along itself by every rational and the points fall into classes. Choose one point from each and the resulting set has no length — not zero, not positive, none: countably many disjoint copies of it would have total length nought or infinity, and the union needs something in between.
Named alongside it
The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.
MeasureCantor setCountabilityDense setGeometric seriesLimitIntervalSelf-similarityAlgebraic numberAxiom of choiceBaire categoryBijection