Matrix
Named by 25 essays across 7 fields — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.
A matrix is a picture of what happens to the grid
Four numbers in a box is not an object anyone has intuitions about. The same four numbers, shown as an instruction for redrawing the plane, are.
Seven bridges, and the invention of throwing things away
Euler solved a puzzle about a Prussian city by deleting the city. What survived the deletion was a new branch of mathematics.
The dot product is a shadow
Multiply the matching coordinates and add them up. That rule explains nothing, and it hides the fact that the answer is a length — how far one arrow reaches along another, times how long that other one is.
The directions a map leaves alone
Almost every arrow comes out of a transformation pointing somewhere else. A few come out pointing exactly where they went in, only longer or shorter. Those few decide nearly everything the map does.
Two numbers that have to meet
Every linear program has a shadow — a second program built from the same numbers read the other way, whose minimum can never fall below the first's maximum. That much is a one-line calculation; the theorem is that the two numbers are always exactly equal.
The number that says how much room is left
A linear map takes the unit square to a parallelogram. The area of that parallelogram is one number, it is computable from the four entries of the matrix, and almost everything the determinant is used for is a restatement of that sentence.
The rule that forgets where it came from
A walk between a few states, with the next step decided by the current one and nothing else. Run it long enough and the starting point stops mattering — but only when two conditions hold, and both of them have a picture in which they fail.
What a map throws away
A linear map redraws the grid, and the determinant measures how much it stretches area. When that measurement comes out zero the map has flattened the plane onto a line — and the question worth asking is not how much was lost but how much survived, because the two always add to what there was.
A tree that holds every triple
Three fixed matrices, applied to 3-4-5 over and over, produce every primitive Pythagorean triple there is — each of them once, none of them twice, and with no test for common factors anywhere in the procedure.
The flat map that fits closest
A derivative is usually met as a number, which works because a line through a point is described by one. In more than one dimension the object that plays the same role is a linear map, and the number was always a one-by-one instance of it.
The polynomial whose roots are the stretches
Finding the directions a map leaves alone means finding the numbers at which it crushes something to nothing. Those numbers are the roots of one quadratic, and everything the map does is written in its two coefficients.
The same map in a better basis
Measured along its own invariant directions, a linear map stops shearing and becomes two independent stretches. Nothing about the map has changed; the grid it is described against has.
What a map does to a circle
Every linear map sends the unit circle to an ellipse. Two perpendicular directions go to two perpendicular directions, whatever the map is — even a map with no invariant direction at all, and even one that is not square.
The exponential of a square
The series for e makes perfect sense with a matrix in it. What comes out solves a system of equations the way the ordinary exponential solves one, and a skew matrix exponentiates into a rotation with no trigonometry anywhere.
The only function that behaves like a volume
Ask for a function of the columns of a matrix that scales when a column scales, vanishes when two columns agree, and gives one on the identity. Three conditions, and there is exactly one such function in every dimension.
A determinant that counts trees
Write down a graph's Laplacian, strike out one row and its column, take the determinant. The answer is the number of spanning trees — and the minus signs in the determinant are what cancel every subset of edges that is not one.
The same sum without its minus signs
Delete the signs from the determinant's sum over permutations and what is left counts things directly rather than by cancellation. It is a better count and a far worse object — because the cancellation was what made the determinant computable.
The chain that stops
Give a chain a state it cannot leave and there is no long run to find — every walk ends. What is worth computing instead is how long it lasts and where it finishes, and both are exact answers to a linear system rather than limits of anything.
Seats to parties and places at once
Seats can be given to regions in proportion to one list of populations, and no rule does it perfectly. Ask for seats to regions and to parties simultaneously and the object stops being a list — and the impossibility that closed the subject does not apply.
Two matrices that generate the tree
A node of the Stern–Brocot tree is not really a fraction — it is the pair of fractions it lies between. Written as the columns of a matrix, the two turns of the tree become two multiplications, and the determinant that kept everything in lowest terms becomes a property of a product.
A plane disguised as an arrow
The cross product of two arrows is an arrow perpendicular to both, as long as the area of their parallelogram. Reflect everything in a mirror and it points the wrong way, because it was never an arrow: it is a plane, written as the one direction a plane in three dimensions leaves over.
The table inside every quota
Give seats to districts and parties at once, and every cell of the table has a fair share it ought to round from. A table rounding every cell to its floor or its ceiling, with every total exact, always exists. The biproportional method does not always choose one: here it gives a party 2 seats where its fair share is 3.088.
Counted across and counted down
A rectangular array has a number of independent rows and a number of independent columns. The two are counted in different spaces, from different objects, by computations that share nothing — and they are always the same number, which is why 'rank' is one word.
The cycles and the cuts
The count that splits a map's source into what dies and what survives has nothing to do with graphs. Apply it to a matrix built from a graph's edges and points and it says that a graph's independent cycles and its independent cuts add to its number of edges — a theorem about drawings, obtained from an array.
A twist that carries one loop to another
Cut a torus along a loop, turn one side of the cut once round, and glue it back. Nothing is torn, so every loop that did not cross itself still does not — but a loop of class (0, 1) is now a loop of class (1, 1). Two such twists reach every loop that never crosses itself, by Euclid's algorithm, and the symmetries they generate are exactly the whole-number matrices of determinant one.
Named alongside it
The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.
DeterminantBasisEigenvectorEigenvalueRankOrientationOrthogonalityShearBijectionDimensionGraphInvariant