Independence of irrelevant alternatives
Named by 2 essays across one field — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.
Four conditions, and no rule that has all of them
The rung below shows five reasonable rules returning five different winners, which invites the obvious question of which one is right. The answer is that the conditions anybody would write down cannot all hold at once — and here each named rule's own violation is found by search rather than quoted.
A lie that pays
Three rungs of this ladder have read a ballot as a report of a preference. This one reads it as a move, and walks every move one voter has — all six rankings, the winner each produces, and the ones that beat honesty.
Named alongside it
The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.
Condorcet cyclePairwise majorityPreference profileVoting ruleArrows theoremCounterexampleDecisive setProof by contradictionStrategic votingStrategy proofness