Growth rate
Named by 12 essays across 5 fields — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.
The size of a number with no formula
There is no closed expression for the number of partitions of n. There is an expression for how large it is — with a square root in the exponent and a π in front — and it is accurate enough that rounding a few terms of its refinement gives the exact count.
How fast the ball fills
Count the elements within r steps of doing nothing. The count grows like a polynomial in some groups and like a power of three in others, the distinction survives every change of generating set, and which polynomial degrees are possible is a theorem nobody expected.
The edge that is as big as the ball
In a lattice the boundary of a large ball is a negligible fraction of it. In a tree it is two thirds of it at every size — and that single ratio, not the group's size, is what decides whether a set can be cut into pieces and reassembled into two copies of itself.
Sixty needs two digits and sixty-one needs ten
The smallest solution of x² − 60y² = 1 is x = 31. For x² − 61y² = 1 it is x = 1,766,319,049. The jump is not an accident of 61: the solution is exactly the product of one period's complete quotients, so its size is set by how long the continued fraction takes to come home — and for the cattle problem Archimedes is said to have posed, that product has 103,273 digits.
The ground a walk covers
A random walk of a thousand steps visits far fewer than a thousand places: in one dimension about fifty, in the plane about four hundred, in space about six hundred and sixty. The share of steps that land on new ground is exactly the chance of never coming home — so the number that decides whether a walker returns also decides how much of the world it sees.
A walk that may not step where it has been
Forbid a walk on the square grid from ever revisiting a site and the number of possible n-step walks grows like 2.638ⁿ instead of 4ⁿ — a number nobody can write down exactly. On the honeycomb it is exactly √(2 + √2), proved in 2010. And the walks spread out like n to the three-quarters, faster than any ordinary walk, which physicists have used since 1949 and mathematicians still cannot prove.
The ripples that make a series run away
Adding up the first N terms of a Fourier series is the same as averaging the function against one fixed wiggly curve. Its area is always one, but the area of its absolute value grows like the logarithm of N, without limit — and that single number is enough to force a continuous function, with no jump and no corner anywhere, whose Fourier series diverges at a point. Averaging the partial sums removes the negative ripples, and with them the whole problem.
What is left when the middle is taken out
Cut a finite piece out of a group's picture and count the parts of what remains that run off forever. The integers leave two, the plane one, a tree more with every cut — and no group anywhere leaves exactly three, because a third end is always the first of infinitely many.
The polygon a lattice becomes from far away
Walk the grid of whole-number points with a fixed set of moves and the places reachable in r moves fill a shape. With axis steps it is a diamond, add a diagonal and it is a hexagon, move like a knight and it is a ragged thing full of holes — which, seen from far enough away, is an octagon exactly. The generators decide the polygon, and the polygon decides the count.
How rarely a walk on a group comes home
Walk at random on the picture of a group, one generator at a time, and ask for the chance of standing at the start after 2n steps. On the line, the plane and three-dimensional space it falls like a power of n. On the tree that pictures the free group it falls by the factor √3/2 every step, exponentially. Kesten proved in 1959 that this is no accident of two examples: the chance falls exponentially exactly when the group's balls are mostly boundary, so a probabilistic rate and a geometric ratio are the same measurement.
A threshold no average can see
Damp the random Fibonacci sequence — add or subtract β times the term before last, by a coin — and somewhere between β = 0.6 and β = 0.8 almost every run stops shrinking and starts growing. The switch is at β ≈ 0.70258. The average of the squares, which can be computed exactly, grows for every β there is, so the one number that decides the sequence's fate is invisible to the one number anybody can compute.
Four lists find a collision sooner
Two lists of random 24-bit strings need about four thousand entries each before some string appears in both — the birthday bound. Ask instead for one string from each of four lists whose exclusive-or is zero, and lists of a few hundred suffice, because merging the lists in pairs manufactures the near-misses a direct search would have to find by luck. David Wagner's algorithm turns the square root into a cube root, and more lists into smaller roots.
Named alongside it
The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.
Cayley graphFree groupRandom walkWord metricExpectationInvariantSimulationConvergenceCountingEnds of a groupGroup actionLattice