Concept

Cauchy schwarz

The inequality saying that an inner product is never larger in size than the product of the two lengths. Equality holds exactly when one vector is a multiple of the other, and the bound is what makes the ratio of a product to two lengths a cosine, so that an angle can be defined in a space with no picture.

Named by 5 essays across 3 fields — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.

The parabola that proves |a·b| ≤ |a||b|. The squared length of a − t b plotted against t. It is a parabola opening upward whose least value is 7.118; that this is never negative is exactly the Cauchy–Schwarz inequality.

The square that cannot be negative

Cauchy–Schwarz is the load-bearing inequality of the whole subject and is nearly always stated without proof. It is one line away from a fact nobody would argue with, and the line is a parabola with no room to cross the axis.

algebra · Inner product
One subtraction clears a direction. Gram–Schmidt on two planar vectors, in 3 panels: the pair as given, the shadow of the second on the first, and the perpendicular pair that is left when the shadow is removed.

One subtraction clears a direction

A basis is a set of directions to measure along, and most bases are awkward because the directions get in each other's way. Removing one shadow at a time turns any basis into one where every coordinate is a shadow and nothing interferes.

algebra · Inner product
Perpendicular to both, and as long as their parallelogram. The vectors (2, 0.4, 0.2) and (0.6, 1.8, 0.3), the parallelogram they span, and their cross product (−0.24, −0.48, 3.36), drawn perpendicular to both with a length of 3.403, which is the parallelogram's area.

A plane disguised as an arrow

The cross product of two arrows is an arrow perpendicular to both, as long as the area of their parallelogram. Reflect everything in a mirror and it points the wrong way, because it was never an arrow: it is a plane, written as the one direction a plane in three dimensions leaves over.

algebra · Inner product
Parity and majority on the cube, and the edges between true and false. Two cubes of three-letter assignments, parity with all twelve edges joining a true and a false corner and majority with 6; Khrapchenko's bound at its best 9.00 against an exact size of 10 and 4.00 against an exact size of 5.

The formula that cannot share

A circuit computes the parity of n letters with a chain of n − 1 exclusive-or gates. A formula in and, or and not, which may use each result only once, needs n² letters at least — a bound Khrapchenko proved by counting the cube's edges between true and false — and exhaustive search over every formula of four letters finds parity sitting exactly on it.

logic · Truth functions
No graph has fewer four-cycles than chance. random p=0.092 t(C4)=0.00141 p^4=0.00007; random p=0.143 t(C4)=0.00344 p^4=0.00042; random p=0.112 t(C4)=0.00203 p^4=0.00016; random p=0.112 t(C4)=0.00276 p^4=0.00016; random p=0.112 t(C4)=0.00266 p^4=0.00016; random p=0.112 t(C4)=0.00266 p^4=0.00016; random p=0.306 t(C4)=0.01739 p^4=0.00878; random p=0.378 t(C4)=0.03223 p^4=0.02032; random p=0.316 t(C4)=0.02140 p^4=0.01001; random p=0.276 t(C4)=0.01400 p^4=0.00576; random p=0.245 t(C4)=0.01249 p^4=0.00360; random p=0.235 t(C4)=0.01182 p^4=0.00303; random p=0.490 t(C4)=0.07476 p^4=0.05755; random p=0.469 t(C4)=0.06862 p^4=0.04854; random p=0.449 t(C4)=0.05685 p^4=0.04064; random p=0.520 t(C4)=0.09126 p^4=0.07335; random p=0.480 t(C4)=0.07648 p^4=0.05290; random p=0.490 t(C4)=0.08080 p^4=0.05755; random p=0.673 t(C4)=0.23074 p^4=0.20572; random p=0.724 t(C4)=0.29628 p^4=0.27550; random p=0.673 t(C4)=0.23511 p^4=0.20572; random p=0.612 t(C4)=0.16150 p^4=0.14051; random p=0.633 t(C4)=0.19013 p^4=0.16020; random p=0.694 t(C4)=0.25750 p^4=0.23181; bipartite p=0.500 t(C4)=0.12500 p^4=0.06250; bipartite p=0.408 t(C4)=0.08330 p^4=0.02775; bipartite p=0.337 t(C4)=0.05670 p^4=0.01286; structured p=0.462 t(C4)=0.05189 p^4=0.04538; structured p=0.214 t(C4)=0.03389 p^4=0.00211; structured p=0.429 t(C4)=0.06778 p^4=0.03374; structured p=0.071 t(C4)=0.00036 p^4=0.00003

No graph is poorer in squares than chance

Take any graph with a fixed share of its possible edges and count how often four points chosen in order close up into a ring. However the edges are arranged — in cliques, in two-sided blocks, at random — the count never falls below what a random graph of the same density gives. Sidorenko conjectured that the same holds for every pattern without an odd cycle. For a triangle it is false; for a path or a ring of four it takes two lines; for K₅,₅ with a ten-cycle removed nobody knows.

discrete · Extremal graphs

Named alongside it

The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.

Inner productOrthogonalityDot productPositive definiteProjectionApproximationBasisBipartite graphBoolean formulaCircuit complexityCounterexampleCross product

All concepts