Borda count
Named by 2 essays across one field — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.
Five rules and five winners
Twenty-seven ranked ballots, five entirely reasonable ways of counting them, and five different candidates declared the winner. Every count is correct, every rule is defensible, and the answer turns out to be a property of the rule rather than of the ballots.
The fewest swaps to a winner
When no candidate beats every other head to head, Charles Dodgson proposed in 1876 to elect the one that is closest to doing so — the candidate that the fewest swaps of neighbouring names on the ballots would turn into a winner of every contest. The rule is easy to state and hard to compute: the count needs a search, and deciding the winner is provably among the hardest problems of its kind. A much simpler count, the votes still to be won, usually agrees, more often the larger the electorate.
Named alongside it
The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.
Voting ruleApproximationCondorcet cycleCondorcet winnerCounterexampleCounting argumentExhaustive searchInstant runoffMajority ruleNP-hardPairwise majorityPreference profile