The same thing twice — page 6
One dimension up, and the circles disappear
The Delaunay triangulation is defined by a condition about circles, which is awkward to compute and awkward to reason about. Lift every point onto a paraboloid and the circles turn into planes, the condition turns into convexity, and a two-dimensional problem is solved by looking at a three-dimensional shape from underneath.
When the sites are not the same size
Give every site a weight and the boundaries slide. The cells stay convex and the edges stay straight, which is surprising, and one thing happens that the unweighted diagram never allows — a site can end up owning nothing at all.
The tree inside the triangulation
The shortest network joining a set of points is built from edges chosen by length, and the triangulation is built from edges chosen by an emptiness condition about circles. The two constructions share no step, and every edge of the first is an edge of the second.
The shape described from outside
A convex shape can be given by its boundary or by the family of lines that touch it, and the second description turns the constant-width condition into one line of arithmetic — after which the perimeter falls out, and curves with no corners at all can simply be written down.
Counting the paths that go wrong
The number of good paths across a grid has no obvious formula. The number of bad ones does, because every bad path can be reflected into a path to a different corner, and that reflection is a perfect matching between two sets nobody chose to relate.
One word, and four objects
A balanced string of brackets, a lattice path, a triangulated polygon and a binary tree are four different-looking things counted by the same numbers. They are not four things that happen to agree — each is a way of writing the others down, and the translation is mechanical.
The equation a sequence satisfies
Write the whole sequence as the coefficients of one series, and the recursion becomes an equation with a square in it. Solving the equation by the ordinary quadratic formula produces the closed form, the growth rate and the correction term, none of which the recursion offers.
The solid whose corners are triangulations
Take the triangulations of a hexagon as points and join two of them when a single diagonal can be swapped for another. The result is not merely a graph — it is the edge skeleton of a genuine convex polyhedron, with fourteen corners, three square faces and six pentagonal ones.
The group a space has at a point
The loops of a space form a group once a starting point is fixed, and the fixing looks like an arbitrary choice that ought to be removable. It is removable, but only up to conjugation, and the residue is exactly what makes a non-commutative fundamental group harder to state than to compute.
Every cover is a subgroup
A space can be unrolled, and the ways of unrolling it are not arbitrary. They correspond exactly to the subgroups of its fundamental group — index equals sheets, normality equals symmetry — so a question about a group becomes a question about a picture and back again.
Cutting a space to find its group
A space assembled from two pieces has a fundamental group assembled from theirs, and the recipe is exact — take everything both groups offer and impose the relations the overlap forces. Almost every fundamental group anybody knows is computed this way, including all of the surfaces.
Why the second group commutes
Replace loops by spheres and the same construction gives a second homotopy group. It is always commutative, and the reason is not a fact about spheres or about any space — it is a two-line argument about any set carrying two compatible operations.
Angles survive and areas do not
Stereographic projection takes every circle on the sphere to a circle or a line, and every crossing angle to itself. It does both exactly, with no approximation anywhere, and it destroys area so thoroughly that a patch near the pole can be a thousand times its neighbour's size.
The sphere that complex numbers live on
Add one point to the complex plane and it becomes a sphere. The rotations of that sphere are exactly the maps written as one linear expression divided by another, so a fact about turning a ball is a fact about dividing polynomials.
One circle, and a straightedge
A straightedge alone cannot bisect a segment, so it cannot draw a parallel, so it can construct almost nothing. Draw one circle anywhere and mark its centre and everything a compass could ever have done becomes available — the circle is never needed again.
The compass that will not open
Fix the compass at one opening and never change it. That looks like a serious loss — a circle of a given radius through a given point is the compass's whole job — and it turns out to cost nothing at all, for reasons that are arithmetic rather than geometric.
The corners are whole assignments
A table of shares can be written as a lottery over whole assignments, which the anchor's first rung demonstrates on one example. The general statement is that the corners of the set of such tables are exactly the whole assignments, and that single fact is why the whole subject is easy.
A price for every person and task
The cheapest assignment can be found without comparing it to any other. Attach a number to each person and each task so that no pair's two numbers exceed its cost, and if the numbers add to an assignment's total, that assignment is cheapest — proved, by an argument that never mentions the alternatives.
One table, two lotteries
A table of shares says what fraction of each task each person does. It does not say how — the same table is a mixture of whole assignments in many different ways, and the differences are exactly what the people being assigned would care about.
How long until it forgets
The ladder's four rungs settle where a chain ends up and how much time it spends there, and none of them asks how long the settling takes. That question has an exact answer, it is a single number, and it is the only thing any practical use of a chain depends on.
A line under every point
The chord above the curve is one definition of convexity. There is a second — a line under the curve at every point, staying under everywhere — and it is the one that turns a statement about a derivative at a point into a statement about the whole function.
The function seen from its tangents
A convex function is the upper envelope of its own tangent lines, so it can be described by giving, for each slope, how far the line of that slope has to be pushed down. That description is a second function, and applying the construction twice returns the original.
How many worlds a formula can need
A modal formula can be true in a model with infinitely many worlds. It can also be true in a small one — and the small one is built from the large one by throwing away every distinction the formula was never able to make.
Two hundred and forty directions
The quaternions have twenty-four units and they are the vertices of the most symmetric object in four dimensions. Eight dimensions has two hundred and forty of them, and the quaternions turn out to be how they are built — twice over, with a hundred and ninety-two left to explain.