Things that cannot be done — page 1
Why the list of perfect solids stops at five
There are infinitely many regular polygons and exactly five regular solids. The reason is not deep, but it is very sharp, and it can be checked on a single row of corners.
Multiplying is turning
Complex numbers are introduced as an algebraic dodge for square roots of negatives. They are better understood as the arithmetic of rotation, at which point every rule stops needing to be remembered.
More things than boxes
If there are more objects than containers, some container holds two. That is the entire principle, it is impossible to disagree with, and it settles questions that look nothing like it.
Four colours, and a proof nobody can read
Every map on a plane can be coloured with four colours so that no two neighbours match. The statement is understandable by a child, it resisted a century of attempts, and the proof that settled it cannot be checked by a human being.
Something always stays put
Stir a cup of coffee however violently and let it settle. Some molecule is exactly where it started. Crumple a map and drop it on the region it depicts, and one point lies over the place it names.
The same terms, in a different order, adding to whatever is asked
Flip alternate signs in the harmonic series and it converges. Reorder the terms — add nothing, remove nothing — and it converges to any number chosen in advance. Addition stops being commutative, and the picture shows where it goes.
Six people at a party
Among any six people, three are mutual acquaintances or three are mutual strangers. Five is not enough, and the arrangement that saves five is a pentagon. Beyond that the numbers become unknowable.
Three moves, and what they cannot undo
A knot is a closed loop of string, and two knots are the same if one can be wiggled into the other. Reidemeister reduced all possible wiggling to three local pictures — which is what makes it possible to prove that a knot is knotted.
Nothing on a sphere can be combed flat
Point an arrow along the surface at every place on a sphere, continuously, and somewhere an arrow has to vanish. On a doughnut it can be done. The difference between the two is a number that was already known from counting corners.
How close a fraction can get
Drop eight points into seven boxes and two of them share. That one line, applied to the multiples of an irrational number, proves that every irrational has infinitely many astonishingly good rational approximations — and no construction is needed anywhere.
Numbers that are their own parts
Six is one plus two plus three. Twenty-eight is one plus two plus four plus seven plus fourteen. Euclid explained where such numbers come from; Euler proved there are no others of that kind; and whether an odd one exists has been open for two thousand years.
The square that cannot shrink
The usual proof that the square root of two is irrational is about even and odd numbers. There is a proof about squares instead, in which a supposed solution is folded into a smaller one — and the folding is a drawing.
A difference too small to draw
Two starting points a ten-thousandth apart, under the same rule, with nothing random anywhere. Within forty steps they have nothing in common — and the rule was not doing anything to them that it does not do to everything.
The rule that computes
One of the 256 elementary rules can run any program. Not simulate one, not approximate one — a machine that can compute anything computable, built from a lookup table with eight rows and nothing else.
The orbit that must come back
A system with finitely many states has to repeat itself. Poincaré showed the same thing holds when the states are a continuum — almost every starting point returns arbitrarily close to where it began, however complicated the rule, and the argument is the pigeonhole principle with volume in place of counting.
Two lobes and no cycle
Three equations, three variables, and a trajectory that never crosses itself, never repeats, and never leaves a region of zero volume. The set it settles onto is not a point, not a loop, and not a surface.
The question nobody can answer
Halve it if it is even, triple it and add one if it is odd. Every number anyone has tried comes down to one. Nobody can prove they all do, and the reason is not that the problem is hard to state.
Four circles cannot do it
Three overlapping circles cut the plane into exactly the eight regions three sets need. Four circles cut it into fourteen, and sixteen are required — so the diagram everyone draws stops working at four, and the reason is a count.
Two worlds that both obey the rules
A statement is independent of a list of axioms when there is a structure satisfying the axioms where it holds and another where it fails. That is not a claim about what nobody has managed to prove — it is a proof that nobody can.
The row that is not on the list
Write down a list of infinite sequences, any list at all, and there is a rule that builds a sequence missing from it. The rule reads one entry from each row, and it is the single most reused argument in this field.
A list that cannot contain itself
The set of all sets that do not contain themselves is not a set. The argument is the diagonal again, applied to a table whose rows and columns are the same objects, and it destroyed the foundations of mathematics in a postcard.
The sentence that says it has no proof
Number every sentence and every proof, and a formal system can talk about itself. Then the diagonal is available one more time, and what it builds is a sentence that is true exactly when it is unprovable.
The cube that will not double
Doubling a cube needs an edge in the ratio of the cube root of two. That number satisfies an equation of degree three, three does not divide any power of two, and the oldest open problem in geometry closes in a line.
The angle that will not divide by three
Halving an angle costs one circle. Cutting it in three means solving a cubic, and for sixty degrees that cubic has no rational root — but plenty of angles do trisect, and which ones is a question with a countable answer.