The collection

Every essay — page 3

Page 3 of 28, continuing through the fields in the same order.

Geometry Analysis Algebra Discrete Topology Probability Number Dynamics Logic Computation Applied What's new Series Concepts Search

Geometry

Shapes, and the arguments that can be made by rearranging them.

100 as three triangular numbers. 100 drawn as three triangles of dots with 36, 36 and 28 dots. There are 6 such decompositions.

Three triangular numbers, and no fewer

On 10 July 1796 Gauss wrote in his diary: ΕΥΡΗΚΑ — num = Δ + Δ + Δ. Every whole number is a sum of three triangular numbers. Two are not enough, and not by a little: the numbers that are sums of two thin out to a share of nought. Both facts are statements about squares in disguise, and one picture translates them.

5 figures
A triangle, its midpoints and its centroid, turned into lines. The dual arrangement of 7 points: one line per point, crossing where points were collinear. 3 crossings are of exactly two lines, the dual of the ordinary lines; the others are where three or more meet.

Three ordinary lines from a count

Kelly's proof finds one line through exactly two of the points by minimising a distance. Melchior, seven years earlier, had found three — by turning every point into a line and counting the corners, edges and regions of the picture that results. Euler's formula for the projective plane does the rest, and it says exactly which configurations have no more than three.

5 figures
Böröczky's 12 points and their 6 ordinary lines. A disc standing for the projective plane: the 6 corners of a regular polygon inside, and 6 points at infinity marked in pairs on the rim. All 22 connecting lines are drawn, the 6 ordinary ones solid.

The fewest ordinary lines a polygon allows

Take the corners of a regular polygon and add the points at infinity where its parallel chords meet. Every chord then carries three points, the line at infinity carries all the new ones, and the only lines left with exactly two points are the tangents at the corners — half as many as there are points. Dirac guessed in 1951 that nothing does better, and Green and Tao proved it in 2013.

5 figures
Every chord through the point cuts into pieces whose product is 16.00. A circle with a point inside it and four chords drawn through the point, each labelled with the lengths of its two pieces, beside four rectangles whose sides are those pieces and whose areas are all equal.

One number for every chord through a point

Draw any line through a point and let it cut a circle twice. The two distances from the point to the circle multiply to the same number whichever line is drawn — inside, outside, or grazing as a tangent. The number belongs to the point, and the reason it does not depend on the line is the inscribed angle: two chords through a point cut out two triangles with the same angles.

6 figures
Each side over the sine of the opposite angle is the diameter. A triangle inscribed in a circle, with the diameter from one corner drawn and joined to a second corner to make a right-angled triangle; the angle opposite the side at the far end of the diameter equals the triangle's own angle opposite that side.

Every side measured by one diameter

In any triangle, divide each side by the sine of the angle opposite it: the three answers are equal. That much is the law of sines, and it is usually left there. The common answer has a name — it is the diameter of the circle through the triangle's corners — and the reason is the inscribed angle once more. It is also why the sine was first a half-chord, why Ptolemy's theorem is the addition formula, and why a circle can hold infinitely many points all at rational distances from each other.

7 figures
Conway's seven pieces, pulled apart and measured. A triangle with angles 78, 54, 48 degrees divided along its angle trisectors into an equilateral centre, three pieces touching it along its sides and three along the outer sides, spread apart, with each corner's angle labelled as a third of an outer angle plus a multiple of sixty degrees.

Seven pieces and an equilateral middle

Morley's theorem has two proofs worth knowing, and they run in opposite directions. The trigonometric one starts from the triangle and computes each side of the inner one as 8R sin α sin β sin γ, symmetric in the three angles. Conway's starts from an equilateral triangle, builds six pieces round it from their angles alone, and shows they fit — so the triangle they make is whatever triangle was wanted, and its middle is equilateral because it was built that way.

5 figures
Twenty-seven choices of trisector, and the eighteen equilateral triangles. Twenty-seven small panels, one for each choice of trisecting line at each corner of a triangle, each drawing the triangle and the triangle the chosen lines cut out; the eighteen equilateral ones are marked.

Eighteen equilateral triangles

Every angle of a triangle has three trisectors, not one, once the angle and its outside are both counted. Choosing one at each corner gives twenty-seven ways to cut out a triangle, and eighteen of them give an equilateral one. The nine that fail are exactly the choices whose labels add to 2, 5 or 8 — and all eighteen equilateral triangles have their sides in the same three directions, fixed by a third of the difference between two angles.

5 figures
Euclid's game on 34 and 21. A 34 by 21 rectangle tiled by the squares of Euclid's algorithm, each run of equal squares shaded by the player who faces it, with the deciding run outlined.

The player who meets the first long run

Turn Euclid's algorithm into a game: two players take turns cutting squares off the rectangle, any number from the current run, and whoever cuts the last one wins. The whole game is decided before it starts — by whether the ratio of the sides is more or less than the golden ratio, which is the same thing as how many runs of length one come first.

5 figures
Counting the real roots of x⁵ − 5x³ + x² + 3x − 1 with Euclid's algorithm. Above, the graph of a polynomial over an interval with its real roots marked; below, a step function counting sign changes in the polynomial's Sturm chain, which drops by one at each root; beside them the chain of polynomials listed.

The remainders that count the roots

Run Euclid's algorithm on a polynomial and its derivative, flipping the sign of each remainder, and write down the signs of the whole chain at any point. The number of sign changes drops by exactly one each time the point passes a real root — so the roots in any interval can be counted, exactly, without finding a single one.

6 figures
A pentagon, its pentagram, and the pentagon inside. A regular pentagon with its diagonals drawn as a pentagram, enclosing a smaller pentagon, repeated 3 times inward; every pentagon has diagonal-to-side ratio φ.

The diagonal no unit measures

Draw the five diagonals of a regular pentagon and they make a star with a smaller pentagon at its centre. Subtract the side from the diagonal and what is left is the smaller pentagon's diagonal; subtract that from the side and what is left is its side. The pentagon has handed back a smaller copy of itself, and it will do so for ever — which means no unit, however small, measures both the side and the diagonal an exact whole number of times.

5 figures
A patch of Penrose's rhombs. A disc of Penrose rhombus tiling after 5 subdivisions, thick and thin rhombs shaded differently: 550 thick and 340 thin half-rhombs.

Tiles that never repeat

Two rhombs with angles taken from the pentagon, cut each into halves, and cut each half into smaller copies of the two halves by a fixed rule. Repeat, and the pieces fill the plane with no gaps and no overlaps, in a pattern with five-fold stars everywhere and no period anywhere. The reason it cannot repeat is a single number: thick tiles outnumber thin ones by φ, and a repeating pattern would make that ratio a fraction.

5 figures
Three tilings by cells of one area, and the wall each needs. Panels of triangles, squares and hexagons, all with cells of the same area, labelled with the wall length each cell needs once shared walls are split between neighbours: the hexagons need the least.

The least wall for equal rooms

Divide the plane into rooms of equal area using as little wall as possible, and every wall does double duty. Bees settled on hexagons long ago, and the proof that nothing does better — not even rooms with curved walls — came in 1999. The straight-walled half of it is two facts: the rooms of any division average six sides, and more sides never cost more wall.

5 figures · new
One symmetrisation: every chord slid to the middle. A lopsided shape with a dent beside its Steiner symmetrisation about a horizontal line, with a few vertical chords marked in both: the chords keep their lengths and are centred on the line.

Every chord slid to the middle

Take a shape, pick a line, and slide every chord that crosses the line at right angles until the line cuts it in half. The area cannot change, the boundary can only get shorter, and the result is symmetric. Do it again about another line, and another, and the shape is squeezed towards a disc — unless the lines are badly chosen, in which case it stops short.

5 figures · new

Analysis

Limits, curves, and what happens when the going does not stop.

A circle unrolled into a sine wave. On the left a radius turns through an angle; on the right the height of its tip is plotted against the angle, tracing a sine curve.

A sine wave is a circle seen from the side

Sine is introduced as a ratio in a right triangle, which is true and explains nothing about why its graph is a wave. There is a better picture.

7 figures
8 rectangles under a curve. A left-endpoint Riemann sum with 8 rectangles approximating the area under a curve.

Adding up rectangles until they stop being rectangles

The integral is defined as a limit of sums of rectangles. The definition is exact, the picture is honest about what it costs, and the gap between them is the whole subject.

7 figures
Partial sums of the square wave. Approximations using 1, 3, 7, 21 terms; the corners sharpen but a fixed overshoot remains.

A square wave built entirely out of round ones

Add enough sine waves together and flat tops and vertical cliffs appear from nothing. Almost — there is a 9% overshoot that never goes away, and it is not a bug.

7 figures
eˣ and its tangent lines. The exponential curve with tangent lines at several points; at each point the slope equals the height.

The curve that is its own slope

There is exactly one shape of exponential curve whose steepness at every point equals its height at that point. The number that produces it is 2.71828…, and it was not chosen for elegance.

7 figures
Terms that vanish, a total that does not. The first 24 terms of the harmonic series as bars, with the running total above them. The last bar is 0.042 tall and the total has reached 3.776.

A sum whose terms vanish and whose total does not

Add a half, a third, a quarter, and keep going. The terms shrink to nothing and the total passes every number there is — but so slowly that no computation will ever watch it happen.

6 figures
Partial sums of sin x. sin x with its Taylor partial sums of degree 1, 3, 5, 9 about zero. Each extra term buys agreement over a wider interval and none of them is right everywhere.

One point's worth of information

A Taylor series claims that everything a function does, everywhere, is encoded in its behaviour at a single point. That claim is extraordinary, it is often true, and the cases where it fails are the interesting ones.

6 figures
Secants closing on the tangent to x². Secant lines through x = 1 and a second point 1.2, 0.8, 0.5, 0.28, 0.12 away, with the slope of each. They approach 2, the derivative there.

The slope of a single point

A slope needs two points. A derivative is the slope at one. The construction that bridges the gap is a sequence of secants, and the whole difficulty of calculus is in what "the limit of that sequence" is allowed to mean.

7 figures
The same terms, with the signs alternating. The partial sums of 1 - 1/2 + 1/3 - 1/4 + …, out to 24 terms. They close on 0.69315 from both sides at once, and the gap between consecutive sums is the next term, so the answer is trapped.

The same terms, in a different order, adding to whatever is asked

Flip alternate signs in the harmonic series and it converges. Reorder the terms — add nothing, remove nothing — and it converges to any number chosen in advance. Addition stops being commutative, and the picture shows where it goes.

7 figures
Area is the undoing of slope. Above, a positive function with the area from 0 to 1.80 shaded. Below, that area plotted against where it stops. The lower curve's slope at 1.80 is 1.129, which is exactly the upper curve's height there.

Area is the undoing of slope

Two operations invented for unrelated reasons — measuring a region and measuring a rate — turn out to be inverse. The picture is two panels sharing one axis, and the claim is that the lower curve's steepness is the upper curve's height.

7 figures
A square cut into 7 pieces and a remainder. A square divided by cutting off a fixed fraction of what is left, over and over, so that the pieces are the terms of a geometric series and the uncut corner is the tail.

The sum that fits in one square

Half, then a quarter, then an eighth, forever. Adding infinitely many things sounds like it should give infinity, and the picture that says otherwise is a square with a corner left uncut.

6 figures
Four staircases against a quarter circle, all of length 2. A quarter circle with staircases of 1, 2, 4, 16 steps drawn over it; each hugs the curve more closely than the last and every one of them is exactly 2 long.

The staircase that is not the diagonal

A staircase can be made to follow a quarter circle as closely as anyone likes. Its length is 2 at every stage and the arc's length is 1.5708, and no amount of refinement closes the gap — which is a fact about length rather than about staircases.

7 figures