Field

Algebra — page 1

Structure — what stays true when the numbers change.
A linear map redrawing the plane. The integer grid before and after a linear transformation; the shaded unit square becomes a parallelogram whose area is the determinant.

A matrix is a picture of what happens to the grid

Four numbers in a box is not an object anyone has intuitions about. The same four numbers, shown as an instruction for redrawing the plane, are.

Multiplying two complex numbers. In the complex plane, multiplying adds the two angles and multiplies the two lengths.

Multiplying is turning

Complex numbers are introduced as an algebraic dodge for square roots of negatives. They are better understood as the arithmetic of rotation, at which point every rule stops needing to be remembered.

The dot product as a shadow. Two vectors and the shadow the first casts on the second. The shadow is 2.425 long and b is 4.123, so the dot product is 10.000.

The dot product is a shadow

Multiply the matching coordinates and add them up. That rule explains nothing, and it hides the fact that the answer is a length — how far one arrow reaches along another, times how long that other one is.

The directions the map leaves alone. Unit vectors and their images under the map. On the two marked lines the image points the same way as the original, stretched by 3.00 and 1.00.

The directions a map leaves alone

Almost every arrow comes out of a transformation pointing somewhere else. A few come out pointing exactly where they went in, only longer or shorter. Those few decide nearly everything the map does.

Completing the square, as a square. An x by x square with the strip split in half and laid along two sides, leaving a square hole of side 1.5. Filling the hole costs 2.25 and buys a perfect square.

Completing the square, by completing a square

The step everybody is taught as an algebraic trick is a literal instruction about a literal square. There is a corner missing, its size is forced, and paying for it is the whole method.

Every relabelling of a 4-gon's corners, and the 8 that are motions. All 24 permutations of the corners drawn one by one, with the 8 that preserve every distance marked; the rest deform the polygon and are not symmetries.

Eight ways to leave a square alone

A square can be picked up and put back so that nothing looks different. There are exactly eight ways to do it, and the number is not asserted here — it is what a search through all twenty-four relabellings of the corners comes back with.

16 colourings in 6 classes. Every way of colouring the corners, with the ones a motion carries to each other placed on the same row; the number of rows is the number of genuinely different colourings.

Colourings nobody can tell apart

Sixteen ways to colour four corners in two colours, and only six of them are genuinely different. The count can be got by pooling the sixteen — or by never forming a single class and instead averaging how many colourings each motion leaves untouched.

The unit square, mapped: area × 5. The unit square and the parallelogram it becomes under a linear map, with the area of that parallelogram computed from its own corners and set against ad − bc.

The number that says how much room is left

A linear map takes the unit square to a parallelogram. The area of that parallelogram is one number, it is computable from the four entries of the matrix, and almost everything the determinant is used for is a restatement of that sentence.

The image of four circles, turning 0 to 3 times. The polynomial applied to circles of four radii, each image drawn as a closed loop with the origin marked, and the number of times the loop goes round it.

A loop that cannot miss the middle

Feed a circle into a polynomial and a closed loop comes out. A small circle gives a loop that does not enclose the origin; a large one gives a loop that goes round it as many times as the degree. Something has to happen in between, and that something is a root.

A subgroup of 2, and the 4 blocks it cuts the group into. The 8 symmetries of a 4-gon, split into 4 blocks by composing every element onto the subgroup {e, r²}. The blocks all have 2 elements and no element is in two of them.

The blocks a subgroup cuts out

Take any part of a group that is closed under composition, and it slices the whole group into blocks of its own size that do not overlap. Everything Lagrange's theorem says is arithmetic about that picture — and whether the blocks can be multiplied is a separate question with a surprising answer.

A whole line arrives at the origin. A linear map whose determinant is zero, drawn before and after. One line of the plane is sent to the origin and the whole plane is sent onto another line; the dimension lost and the dimension kept add to two.

What a map throws away

A linear map redraws the grid, and the determinant measures how much it stretches area. When that measurement comes out zero the map has flattened the plane onto a line — and the question worth asking is not how much was lost but how much survived, because the two always add to what there was.

3 roots, and the two numbers the coefficients already knew. The roots of a degree-3 polynomial, found numerically, with the point they average to. That average, and their product, are readable straight off the coefficients without finding the roots at all.

What the coefficients already know

Finding the roots of a polynomial is hard and often impossible in closed form. Reading off their sum, their product and how many of them are real is none of those things — those numbers are sitting in the coefficients, and no root-finding is required to get at them.

The 7 7th roots of unity. 7 points spaced evenly around the unit circle, at the vertices of a regular 7-sided polygon.

The polygon an equation forces

The n solutions of z to the n equals one are the corners of a regular polygon, and nearly everything about them — that they form a group, that they sum to zero, that the equation factors into pieces with whole-number coefficients — is that picture read carefully.

The dihedral group of a 4-sided shape, drawn as a map. A Cayley graph: one dot per motion of the shape, with one arrow per generator, so that multiplying by a generator is following an arrow of that colour.

The group drawn as a map

A multiplication table says everything about a group and shows nothing; lay the same information out as one dot per element and one arrow per generator, and multiplying becomes walking, distance becomes a word length, and the group acquires a shape.

The tower ℚ ⊂ ℚ(√2) ⊂ ℚ(√2, √3). A tower of field extensions with the degree of each step, beside the multiplication table of the basis.

A tower whose degrees multiply

Treat a field containing another as a vector space over it, and the size of an extension becomes a dimension — one that multiplies along a tower, so that three impossible constructions become arithmetic about which numbers divide which.

Two coefficient arrays, one with determinant zero and one without. The Sylvester matrices of two pairs of polynomials drawn as grids of coefficients, one pair sharing a root and one not, with each determinant computed in whole numbers and checked against whether a shared root exists.

A shared root, found without finding it

Two polynomials have a root in common exactly when one determinant built from their coefficients is zero. No root is computed, nothing is approximated, and the same construction turns two equations in two unknowns into one equation in one.

The permutation (1 3 4 2) drawn as 4 strings, crossing 3 times. A permutation drawn as strings running from a row of numbered pegs to another, with every place two strings cross marked, and the crossing count checked against the number of pairs that are out of order.

The crossings that will not come out even

Draw a rearrangement as strings from one row of pegs to another and count where they cross. The count depends on how the strings are drawn; whether it is odd or even does not, and that single bit is what makes determinants exist and a sliding puzzle unsolvable.

The subgroups of a polynomial's symmetries, against the fields they name. Two lattices side by side, one of the subgroups of the symmetry group of the cube roots of two and the other of the fields between the rationals and the splitting field, drawn so that one is the other turned upside down.

The lattice that runs the other way

The symmetries of a polynomial's roots form a group, and the fields between the bottom and the top form a lattice. The two are the same picture, one of them turned over — a bigger group of symmetries fixes less, so it names a smaller field.

The quaternion multiplication table, from i² = j² = k² = ijk = −1. A four-by-four multiplication table of the quaternion units, with the row giving the left factor, every entry computed from Hamilton's rule, and the pair that differs between the two orders marked.

A multiplication that remembers the order

Four characters — i² = j² = k² = ijk = −1 — define a multiplication in which ab and ba are different numbers. Everything follows from them, including the fact that a rotation of a solid body has two names, and that two full turns are needed to get one of them home.

The derived series of S3, S4, S5. A table with one row per group giving the sizes along its derived series, each step the subgroup generated by all commutators of the last, and whether the series reaches the identity.

The group that will not come apart

Solving an equation by radicals means building a tower of roots, and a tower of roots corresponds to a chain of subgroups with abelian steps. For the general equation of degree five that chain would have to descend through a group of sixty elements with no normal subgroup in it — so there is no formula, and the obstruction is a finite object that can be written out.

The polynomial whose roots are the stretches. The determinant of A − λI plotted against λ for the map [2, 1, 1, 2], with its roots at 3 and 1 marked.

The polynomial whose roots are the stretches

Finding the directions a map leaves alone means finding the numbers at which it crushes something to nothing. Those numbers are the roots of one quadratic, and everything the map does is written in its two coefficients.

The same map, written in the basis of its own eigenvectors. Three panels: the map [2, 1, 1, 2] on the standard grid, the diagonal stretch by 3 and 1 it becomes on the eigenvector grid, and the two put back together.

The same map in a better basis

Measured along its own invariant directions, a linear map stops shearing and becomes two independent stretches. Nothing about the map has changed; the grid it is described against has.

The level curve, and the axes the matrix chooses. The curve xᵀAx = 1 for the matrix [2, 0.8, 0.8, 1.4], drawn by solving for the radius at each angle, with the two eigen-directions marked; they cross at a right angle and are the axes of the curve.

Symmetry forces a right angle

A matrix equal to its own reflection across the diagonal always has real stretches and always has perpendicular directions to stretch along. Neither is true of matrices in general, and both follow from one line of algebra.

What the map does to a circle. The unit circle with two perpendicular directions marked, and its image under [1.6, 1.2, −0.4, 1.1] — an ellipse whose axes are the images of those two directions, of lengths 2.04 and 1.10.

What a map does to a circle

Every linear map sends the unit circle to an ellipse. Two perpendicular directions go to two perpendicular directions, whatever the map is — even a map with no invariant direction at all, and even one that is not square.

All essays