Normal number
Named by 3 essays across one field — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.
Almost every orbit is fair
Double a number and keep the fractional part, and do it again, and again. Where the orbit goes is written in the number's binary digits, and for almost every starting point it spends exactly a quarter of its time in each quarter of the interval. The proof is a short argument about Fourier coefficients being pushed to infinity — and it leaves room for a set of exceptions with no length at all, which includes every fraction and, for all anyone can prove, every number anyone has ever named.
Fractions repeat and roots look random
Almost every number between 0 and 1 has base-φ digits with the frequencies Parry's measure predicts. Which particular numbers do? Every fraction, provably, does not: its expansion repeats from the first digit, with a period equal to the period of the Fibonacci numbers modulo its denominator. And √2 − 1 and 1/π, computed exactly to twelve thousand digits, match every predicted frequency to within sampling error — which proves nothing about them at all.
The cosines of the powers of two
Start at cos 1 and apply x ↦ 2x² − 1 over and over. The map is chaotic and exactly solvable: the k-th point is cos(2ᵏ), the cosine of two to the k radians. Iterate it in floating point and the computed orbit leaves the true one after 51 steps. Read the binary digits of 1/(2π) instead and the true orbit can be followed for as long as digits can be computed — here 262,080 steps — and at that length it is as fair as any orbit can look. Whether it stays fair is a question about those digits, and nobody can answer it.
Named alongside it
The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.
Binary expansionErgodic theoremInvariant measureBeta expansionChebyshev polynomialDoubling mapErgodicityFibonacci numbersFourier seriesGolden ratioMeasure zeroRounding