Modular group
Named by 4 essays across 2 fields — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.
Two matrices that generate the tree
A node of the Stern–Brocot tree is not really a fraction — it is the pair of fractions it lies between. Written as the columns of a matrix, the two turns of the tree become two multiplications, and the determinant that kept everything in lowest terms becomes a property of a product.
The arcs a line crosses on its way to a number
Draw a semicircle over every pair of neighbouring fractions and the half-plane above the number line is cut into curved triangles that never overlap. A straight line dropped towards any number crosses those arcs one after another, and the arcs it crosses, and the side it leaves each triangle by, are exactly the steps of the Stern–Brocot descent towards that number.
A twist that carries one loop to another
Cut a torus along a loop, turn one side of the cut once round, and glue it back. Nothing is torn, so every loop that did not cross itself still does not — but a loop of class (0, 1) is now a loop of class (1, 1). Two such twists reach every loop that never crosses itself, by Euclid's algorithm, and the symmetries they generate are exactly the whole-number matrices of determinant one.
Counting the classes that break factorisation
The class number measures how badly unique factorisation fails in a field, and defined through ideals it looks impossible to compute. Gauss computed it by hand, for every field he wanted, by counting quadratic forms — and every form can be squeezed, by changes of variable that keep its values, into exactly one small standard shape.
Named alongside it
The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.
DeterminantMatrixMediantStern brocot treeUnimodularBijectionClass groupClass numberContinued fractionsDehn twistDiscriminantEuclidean algorithm