Literal
Named by 3 essays across one field — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.
The tree that closes
To prove a formula, assume it false and take it apart. Every branch ends in a contradiction, or one of them describes exactly how it could have been false — and either way the tree is the answer, drawn.
A proof with one rule
Two clauses that disagree about exactly one variable can be combined into a third that forgets it; repeat, and if the clauses cannot all be true the empty clause eventually appears — a complete proof system with a single move.
Two literals make an arrow
A clause of two literals, p ∨ q, says that if p is false then q is true, and if q is false then p is true — two arrows. A set of such clauses is a directed graph on the literals, and it is unsatisfiable exactly when some variable and its negation reach each other. Each of those two paths is a chain of resolution steps, and finding them takes time proportional to the size of the input.
Named alongside it
The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.
RefutationSatisfiabilityCompletenessNormal formProof systemResolutionSoundnessBranchingDecision procedureGraphTableauThreshold