Concept

Chain — where it appears

A collection of elements of an order every two of which are comparable, so that they can be listed one above another. Chains are the opposite extreme from antichains, and the two are related by a min-max theorem: the fewest chains covering an order equals the size of its largest antichain.

Named by 4 essays across 2 fields — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.

The widest layer of the subsets of a set of 4. A Hasse diagram of a small order with the widest layer marked, and the largest set of mutually incomparable elements found by examining every subset.

The widest layer and the longest chain

Order sixteen subsets by inclusion and ask for the largest collection with no two comparable. The answer is the six subsets of size two — the widest layer — and no cleverer collection beats it. Ask instead for the fewest chains covering everything, and the answer is the same number again.

discrete · Posets $Everybody's share of the 24 chains. The subsets of a set of 4, each labelled with the fraction of maximal chains it lies on; the shares of any antichain add to at most one, and to exactly one only for a whole layer.$

Everybody's share of the chains

There are twenty-four ways to build a four-element set one element at a time. Every subset lies on some of them, and no two incomparable subsets share one — so an antichain is a set of disjoint shares of a single whole.

discrete · Posets

The cube cut into 6 symmetric chains. The subsets of a set of 4 partitioned into 6 chains by the bracket rule, each chain running from size k to size 4 − k and passing once through the middle layer.

The cube cut into chains

Write a subset as a string of brackets, match them the ordinary way, and the unmatched ones say which chain it is on. Six chains cover all sixteen subsets of a four-element set, and the bound and the example arrive together.

discrete · Posets

Which chains of truth values validate Gödel's disjunctions. A grid of Gödel's pigeonhole formulas in m letters against chains of n truth values, marking which chains validate which formula, forming a staircase where m exceeds n.

No table of truth values is enough

Two truth values decide classical logic. Gödel asked in 1932 whether some longer list of values could decide the constructive system, and answered with a pigeonhole: with n values, some two of n + 1 statements must share one, so a formula saying exactly that holds in every n-valued table and is not a theorem. The chains of truth values then descend forever, and what they share is a logic of its own — the logic of the real interval.

logic · Non classical logic

Named alongside it

The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.

Antichain Binomial coefficient Sperner theorem Poset Bijection Counting argument Counting two ways Dilworth theorem Disjunction property Extremal problem Hasse diagram Heyting algebra

All concepts