Algebraic integer
Named by 7 essays across 3 fields — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.
On the circle and never home
Every root of unity lies on the unit circle, and so does the point (3 + 4i)/5 — yet no power of it ever returns to 1. A root of a whole-number polynomial of degree ten does the same. What forces a point home is a condition on the numbers its polynomial ties it to, and how far one of them may stray is a question open since 1933.
![The integers of ℚ(√5), with ℤ[√5] inside them. Points a + bφ plotted against their conjugates for small whole a and b, with the index-two sublattice ℤ[√5] filled and the basic cells of both lattices shaded, of areas √5 and 2√5.](/f/the-integers-of-q-5-with-z-5-inside-them-a4f067e7.svg)
The integers a field contains
Inside the field of numbers a + b√5, the obvious integers are those with whole a and b. They are not all of them: the golden ratio has a one-half in it and satisfies x² = x + 1, a monic equation with whole coefficients, exactly as an integer should. The right integers form a lattice twice as dense as the obvious one — and a whole-number matrix proves they are closed under addition.
Factoring uniquely with no way to divide
Unique factorisation is proved by dividing with a small remainder, and in the Gaussian integers that works because discs of radius one cover the plane. In the integers of ℚ(√−19) the discs leave holes, no division algorithm of any kind can be made to work — and factorisation is unique anyway. The same field is why n² + n + 41 is prime forty times running.
Two sign patterns that land together
At λ = 1/φ the sign patterns + − − and − + + land in exactly the same place, because λ² + λ = 1. That one coincidence, repeated wherever it fits, puts 2ⁿ patterns onto a Fibonacci number of points, leaves the random sum's transform ringing at the same height forever, and makes a distribution that fills a whole interval live on a set of no length.
Units that form a lattice
In the whole numbers only 1 and −1 have whole-number reciprocals. In the integers of a bigger field there can be infinitely many such units, and they are not scattered: take logarithms of their sizes under each way of placing the field in the real or complex numbers, and the units land exactly on a lattice. How many dimensions that lattice has is a count of those placements, and the area of its cell is a number no formula gives.
The class number is a degree
The integers of ℚ(√−23) fall into three classes of ideals, and that 3 can be found by counting forms. It is also the degree of a single number: the modular function j, evaluated at the three forms' points, gives three values that are not whole but are the roots of one cubic with whole-number coefficients. When there is only one class, the value is a whole number outright — and that is why e^(π√163) misses being whole by less than a trillionth.
How near nought a sum of roots can come
Five arrows of length one, each pointing at a 122nd root of unity, laid end to end, return to within fifteen millionths of where they started. No five of the 123rd roots come within a thousandth. Two, three and four arrows shrink their smallest miss in a tidy power of n; five scatter over four powers of ten from one n to the next, and nobody knows the law they follow.
Named alongside it
The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.
LatticeMinimal polynomialNormUnique factorisationCyclotomic polynomialDeterminantField extensionGaussian integersGolden ratioPigeonhole principleRoots of unityUnit