Theme

Things that cannot be done — page 9

Results that close a door rather than open one — and the peculiar difficulty of drawing a picture of something that does not exist.
Which D up to 400 make x² − Dy² = −1 solvable. D from 2 to 400: 69 solvable, 302 blocked by 4 or a prime 4k + 3, 9 unsolvable with no such obstruction, first at 34. Number

When minus one can be reached

x² − Dy² = 1 always has a solution. Put −1 on the right and it sometimes does and sometimes does not. A remainder rules out most D at a glance, every prime of the form 4k + 1 is guaranteed one, and between the two lies a set of D decided by arithmetic several layers deep — of which, a million numbers in, 78% are solvable, on the way to a limit of 58% that was proved only in 2022.

A trefoil knot made of six straight sticks. Hexagon with corners (6, 2, 3), (7, 7, 10), (1, 6, 4), (2, 1, 7), (8, 10, 5), (0, 9, 9); three crossings from above, determinant 3, Alexander polynomial t² − t + 1. Topology

Six sticks tie a trefoil, and five cannot

Build a knot from straight sticks joined end to end and ask for the fewest. A trefoil takes six, and the six corners can be whole-number points in a box ten units wide. Five sticks can cross one another five times in a picture, as often as a cinquefoil needs, and still tie nothing — the five crossings always twist three one way and two the other. The fewest sticks is a measure of how knotted a knot is that no diagram shows directly.

A knot drawn with three sines: 5₂ as a Lissajous knot. Frequencies 2, 3, 7 with phases 0.1, 0.7, 0.3; 7 crossings from above; Alexander polynomial 2t − 3 + 2t⁻¹; determinant 7. Analysis

Three sines tie a knot

Let a point move with a different sine wave in each of the three directions of space, the three frequencies whole numbers with no common factor, and it traces a closed curve that is usually knotted. With frequencies 2, 3 and 7 the curve is the knot 5₂. The trefoil, the simplest knot of all, can never be made this way: the half-turn that shifting time by half a period performs forces a condition on the knot's polynomial that the trefoil fails.

The longest code that survives every erasure pattern, by field and dimension. q 2, k 2: 3; q 2, k 3: 4; q 3, k 2: 4; q 3, k 3: 4; q 3, k 4: 5; q 4, k 2: 5; q 4, k 3: 6; q 4, k 4: 5; q 4, k 5: 6; q 5, k 2: 6; q 5, k 3: 6; q 5, k 4: 6; q 5, k 5: 6; q 5, k 6: 7; q 7, k 2: 8; q 7, k 3: 8; q 7, k 4: 8; q 7, k 5: 8; q 7, k 6: 8; q 8, k 2: 9; q 8, k 3: 10; q 8, k 4: 9; q 8, k 5: 9; q 8, k 6: 9; q 9, k 2: 10; q 9, k 3: 10; q 9, k 4: 10. Computation

The longest code that survives every erasure

A Reed–Solomon code of k symbols can lose any n − k of its n and still be read. Over an alphabet of q symbols it can be at most q + 1 long — and it is conjectured that no code with the same perfect tolerance can ever be longer, apart from one family of exceptions in even characteristic. A search through every possible code for small alphabets confirms it cell by cell, a proof exists when q is prime, and for every other q the question is open.

The proof of Descartes' rule, one term at a time. Four stacked graphs: a four-term polynomial with three positive roots, and the three polynomials obtained by dividing out a power of x and differentiating, each with one fewer term, one fewer sign change and one fewer positive root. Geometry

What the signs allow

Descartes' rule reads the signs of a polynomial's coefficients and bounds its positive roots by how often they change — a bound set by the number of terms, not the degree, and proved by nothing more than Rolle's theorem. Each count the rule allows can be had. But not every pair of counts, positive and negative, that the rule allows together can be had together: the first combination that never occurs is at degree four, and the list of impossible ones is still being worked out.

Two curves with five crossings: x⁶ + (44/31)y³ − y and its mirror. Two curves in the positive quadrant, each the zero set of a trinomial, crossing at five marked points. Geometry

Five where four were promised

In one unknown, a polynomial with three terms has at most two positive roots, whatever its degree. The natural guess for two equations in two unknowns, each with three terms, was two times two: four. It is wrong. Bertrand Haas found two such equations in 2002 whose curves cross five times in the positive quadrant, all five crowded within a tenth of one corner, and five turned out to be the most there can ever be.

Descartes' number, perfect but for one factor. Five boxes for the prime powers of Descartes' number, each with its divisor sum factored beneath, multiplying to exactly twice the number provided 22021 is treated as a prime. Number

Perfect but for one factor

In 1638 Descartes wrote to Mersenne with an odd number whose divisors add up to exactly twice the number — provided one of its factors, 22021, is counted as a prime. It is not; it is 19² × 61. Nearly four centuries later that number is still the only odd one of its kind known, and a search of every odd number below ten million finds no other. It is the closest anyone has come to an odd perfect number, and what it shows is how an odd perfect number would have to be built.

A single table for 9 guests over 4 nights. Small circles of 9 guests, one per night, each showing the night's seating as a closed zigzag path; every pair of guests is adjacent in exactly one of them. Probability

Every pair side by side, once

Seat an odd number of guests at round tables for as many nights as it takes, the same table sizes every night, so that every two guests sit side by side on exactly one night. For a single table a zigzag turned a notch each night does it for any number of guests. For other table plans the answer is almost always yes — and for six guests at two tables of three, nine at tables of four and five, and eleven at three, three and five, an exhaustive search proves it is no.

Seven points in space and a knotted path through all of them, seed 12. A projection of K₇ with straight edges, faint, and one Hamiltonian cycle drawn heavy with its crossings broken: a trefoil. 9 of the 360 Hamiltonian cycles are knotted. Topology

Seven points and a knot they cannot avoid

Put seven points anywhere in space and join every pair with a straight segment. There are 360 closed paths that visit all seven points once each, and at least one of them is knotted — however the points are placed. The reason is a parity, as it was for six points and a linked pair: a number read off each path's knot adds up, over all 360, to something odd. Six points are not enough; seven always are.

Which pairs of the square's symmetries commute: 40 of 64. A 8-by-8 grid over the elements of the 8 symmetries of a 4-gon, rows and columns grouped into 5 conjugacy classes, with a filled square wherever the two elements commute: 40 filled squares, and each row's count of filled squares written at its end. Algebra

Five-eighths of the pairs, and no more

Pick two symmetries of a square at random and do them in both orders: forty times in sixty-four the result is the same. No group that fails to commute does better. The reason is a count of pairs that turns into a count of conjugacy classes, and a two-line argument about the centre that caps the answer at five-eighths — reached by the square and the quaternions, approached from above by nothing, and approached from below by groups that commute a little more than half the time.

What survives on each agenda, 3 judges. A table of four agendas with, for each, the size of its largest inconsistent set, the number of independent unanimous rules for 3 judges, how many are consistent on every profile, and how many of those are dictatorships, oligarchies and other rules: two unconnected questions 324 of 324; a chain of two thresholds 129 of 324; two premises and their conjunction 7 of 5,832; a ranking of three options 3 of 5,832. Applied

What the agenda leaves standing

Ask for a rule that settles each question from the votes on that question, follows a unanimous court and never contradicts itself, and search every such rule for three judges. On a ranking of three options, three survive: one dictator per judge. On two premises and their conjunction, seven survive: every rule in which a fixed set of judges must all agree. On a chain of thresholds, a hundred and twenty-nine, majority among them. The difference is not in the rules. It is in which answers force which, and whether that forcing ever runs back.

Six permutations as six arrows between three symbols. A directed graph with 3 vertices and 6 arrows, one per permutation of 3 symbols in shorthand, every vertex with two arrows in and two out, numbered in the order of an Euler circuit spelling 213231. Computation

Every ordering once, around a cycle

No cycle can show every ordering of three symbols as a window of three: a window holding each symbol once forces the next symbol to repeat the one just dropped, so the sequence has period three and shows three orderings of six. Two repairs work. Write each ordering by its first two entries and the transitions form a balanced graph, so Euler's theorem hands over the cycle at once. Or add a fourth symbol and ask only that each window keep a different relative order — which works too, but no graph explains why.

The seven graphs of the Petersen family. Seven small graph drawings, K₆, G7, K₃,₃,₁, K₄,₄ minus an edge, G8, G9, Petersen graph, arranged by vertex count with 6 arrows for the triangle-to-star exchanges between them. Topology

Seven graphs that must link

Six points joined in every way cannot be placed in space without two disjoint triangles hooking together. Trade any triangle for a three-pointed star, or a star back for a triangle, and the property survives; doing it in every possible way from K₆ reaches exactly seven graphs, the Petersen graph among them, and stops. Every placement of every one of them links, by the same parity count. Remove any edge from any of them, and placements that link nothing appear at once. The seven are the whole answer: a graph must link exactly when it contains one of them.

Four equal quarters of an L-shaped plate. An L-shaped plate cut by two perpendicular halving lines at 48.8 degrees into four pieces of equal area. Topology

Four equal quarters with two lines

Any flat shape, however lopsided, can be cut into four pieces of equal area by two perpendicular straight lines. The proof turns the pair of lines like the hands of a clock: the area in one quadrant, minus a quarter, reverses its sign every quarter-turn, so somewhere it is zero. The same kind of argument cuts a solid into eight equal pieces with three planes. It stops working in five dimensions, where some masses cannot be cut into thirty-two equal pieces by five hyperplanes — and in four, nobody knows.

How many three-state chains constant rates can produce. s 0.05: 94.9%; s 0.1: 90.2%; s 0.2: 79.6%; s 0.3: 70.3%; s 0.5: 47.7%; s 0.7: 22.9%; s 1: 4.3%. Analysis

When a table of moves came from steady rates

A process that jumps between states at constant rates, watched once a year, produces a table of yearly moves that is the exponential of its rates. Most tables that anyone could write down are not — a random three-state table is only about one time in twenty-three — and the few that are can have two different sets of rates behind them, but only once the process has forgotten where it started.

No prices clear a market for a pair worth 3. The plane of prices for items A and B, with the triangle pA + pB ≤ 3 where buyer 1 wants the pair and the square pA, pB ≥ 2 where buyer 2 wants neither; they do not meet. Applied

Prices for things wanted only together

When every buyer wants one thing, there are always prices at which everyone is content with what they get. Let one buyer want two things together and there may be none — and whether there are is decided exactly by whether the market's best fractional allocation beats its best whole one.

Petersen's graph and a tour that cannot close. The words of length 5 with 2 ones, joined when disjoint (10 vertices, 15 edges), with an open tour through every vertex drawn heavy. Discrete

The symmetric graphs no tour can close

Take the words of five places with two ones and join two when they share no one. The ten words look exactly alike to the graph, and no closed tour runs through them — because every way of leaving out one edge at each word leaves two pentagons. Only four connected graphs this symmetric are known to fail like that, and nobody knows whether a fifth exists.

The lowest mode of the regular pentagon. Level lines of the first Dirichlet eigenfunction of a regular 5-gon; λ times area 18.9191. Geometry

Three sides and four are proved

Among all shapes of a given area, the disc has the smallest lowest eigenvalue. Among triangles it is the equilateral one, among quadrilaterals the square — both proved by sliding chords to an axis. For five sides the regular pentagon wins every computation, every nudge raises its value by the square of the nudge, and there is still no proof.

Seven points split into three groups whose hulls share a point. Seven random points in a square split into three groups of sizes 2, 2, 3 whose convex hulls share a common point; 4 of the 301 splits work. Topology

Seven points split three ways

Any seven points in the plane can be divided into three groups whose convex hulls share a point, and six points in general position never can. The theorem is Helge Tverberg's; its topological version, in which straight lines may bend, is true when the number of groups is a power of a prime and false otherwise — and the proof that decides which is the same antipodal argument that halves a sandwich.

Every three-state machine and what becomes of it. halt: 1379; no halting entry: 12492; exact repeat: 361; shifted repeat: 2254; dies backwards: 36; unexplained: 27. Logic

The machines that need a reason never to stop

Run every three-state machine on a blank tape and the ones that halt announce themselves: the longest stops after 21 steps. The work is in the others. Each needs a reason it will never stop, and four simple kinds of reason settle all but 27 of them — machines that sweep back and forth over a growing tape and defeat every check that looks for a repeat.

Apéry's proof for ζ(3), as three numbers. log₁₀ of 2·lcm(1, …, n)³, of |a(n)ζ(3) − b(n)| and of their product for n up to 60: slopes 1.262, -1.546, -0.284 per step. Number

The race that makes ζ(3) irrational

Roger Apéry's 1978 proof that the sum of the reciprocal cubes is not a fraction comes down to a race between two numbers. A whole-number multiplier grows by a factor of ten every 0.79 steps; the gap it multiplies shrinks by a factor of ten every 0.65. The gap wins, by a margin of about seventeen per cent, and that margin is the whole proof.

Three polynomials of signs around the circle. The size of the polynomial around the unit circle divided by √64 for all-plus, random and Rudin–Shapiro sign polynomials of length 64; maxima 8.00, 2.50, 1.41. Algebra

The flattest polynomials of signs

A polynomial whose coefficients are all +1 or −1 has average size √n on the unit circle. Keeping it near √n everywhere is the problem Littlewood posed: the Rudin–Shapiro polynomials never exceed √2 times it, searching every sign pattern up to length 22 finds the best are the Barker sequences, and whether the maximum can come arbitrarily close to √n is still open.

Sperner's corridor to the same fixed point, on a gentle map and a twisted one. Two 32 by 32 labelled grids; the corridor crosses 44 triangles reading 100 corners on the gentle map and 148 triangles reading 204 corners on the twisted one. Topology

What it costs to find the point that stays put

Brouwer's theorem promises a point a map leaves where it is, and Sperner's corridor walks to it. On a gentle map the walk is short; twist the map about its fixed point and the corridor follows every turn, so its cost grows like the square of the grid. Halving the square by winding number finds the same point in a number of readings proportional to the grid's side whatever the map does — and no method that only reads the map can do fundamentally better.

Every envy-free way to split one rent among three rooms. A triangle of rent splits of 90 with the envy-free hexagon (corners 30, 30, 30; 46.7, 21.7, 21.7; 50, 25, 15; 45, 35, 10; 35, 40, 15; 28.3, 33.3, 28.3) and the maximin, equal and grid splits marked. Applied

A rent nobody envies is not one rent

Three housemates, three rooms, one rent, and Sperner's lemma promises a split nobody envies. It does not promise one split. For housemates who judge rooms by value for money, the envy-free splits fill a polygon, and in a typical house some room's rent can move across a quarter of the total without anyone envying anyone. Choosing inside it is a second decision. The rule the rent-splitting websites use makes the worst-off housemate as well off as possible, and in almost every house it rewards a housemate who understates what the rooms are worth.

All themes