Series

The exponential — the series

10 essays on one idea, from the one that introduces it to the one that assumes the rest.
  1. eˣ and its tangent lines. The exponential curve with tangent lines at several points; at each point the slope equals the height.

    The curve that is its own slope

    There is exactly one shape of exponential curve whose steepness at every point equals its height at that point. The number that produces it is 2.71828…, and it was not chosen for elegance.

    part 1 · analysis
  2. The area that names the number. The curve 1/x with the area under it from 1 to 2.7183 shaded, measuring 1.0000.

    The area that names the number

    The number e can be defined without mentioning slopes at all. Slide right along the curve 1/x until the area underneath reaches exactly one, and stop. That is where e is, and the reason logarithms turn multiplication into addition is visible in the same picture.

    part 2 · analysis
  3. The slopes the equation demands, and the curves that obey them. A field of short segments whose slope at each point is 0.9 times the height there, with 3 solution curves integrated through it; each doubles over an interval of 0.770 wherever that interval is taken.

    The equation with only one answer

    A rate of change proportional to the current amount is the most common description in nature, and it pins down the function completely. There is exactly one curve through each starting point, and a half-life and a doubling time are the same measurement.

    part 3 · analysis
  4. The flow of a linear equation, and the matrix that runs it for one unit of time. Paths of points moving so that their velocity is [0.25, −1.2, 1.2, 0.25] applied to their position, with the position after time 1 marked on each; the matrix taking start to finish is e^A.

    The exponential of a square

    The series for e makes perfect sense with a matrix in it. What comes out solves a system of equations the way the ordinary exponential solves one, and a skew matrix exponentiates into a rotation with no trigonometry anywhere.

    part 4 · analysis
  5. The share of arrangements that fix nothing, up to 8 objects. A bar per number of objects, giving the proportion of its arrangements that leave nothing in place, against the horizontal line at 1/e.

    The constant that counts what does not happen

    Nothing grows in a shuffled pack of cards, and nothing grows in a factorial. Yet e sits in the middle of both — as the chance that a shuffle leaves nothing in place, and as the base that makes n! nearly a power.

    part 5 · analysis
  6. The trace–determinant plane and the flows it sorts. The plane of trace against determinant, divided by the horizontal axis and the parabola tr² = 4 det into saddle, node, spiral and centre regions, with 6 matrices marked and their phase portraits drawn alongside.

    Two numbers decide the flow

    A linear system in the plane has four coefficients, and what its solutions do forever afterwards — spiral in, race out, swing round, or split along two lines — is decided by two of the numbers made from them. The plane of trace against determinant is a complete map of the possibilities, and the only places it cannot decide are the lines where it changes its mind.

    part 6 · analysis
  7. Which real 2 × 2 matrices have a real logarithm, read off their eigenvalues. Eigenvalues of 7 matrices plotted in the complex plane with the negative real axis emphasised, beside a table saying for each whether a real logarithm exists and why: A yes, B yes, C yes, D no, E no, F yes, G no.

    The matrix that has no logarithm

    Every square matrix has an exponential, and a matrix exponential is always invertible. The converse fails, and it fails in a way that can be read straight off the eigenvalues — a real matrix with eigenvalues −1 and −2 is no exponential at all, while minus the identity is the exponential of a whole continuum of matrices that do not even commute with each other.

    part 7 · analysis
  8. How many three-state chains constant rates can produce. s 0.05: 94.9%; s 0.1: 90.2%; s 0.2: 79.6%; s 0.3: 70.3%; s 0.5: 47.7%; s 0.7: 22.9%; s 1: 4.3%.

    When a table of moves came from steady rates

    A process that jumps between states at constant rates, watched once a year, produces a table of yearly moves that is the exponential of its rates. Most tables that anyone could write down are not — a random three-state table is only about one time in twenty-three — and the few that are can have two different sets of rates behind them, but only once the process has forgotten where it started.

    part 8 · analysis
  9. Fewer tables have rates behind them as states are added. n=2: 0.02:1.000 0.05:1.000 0.1:1.000 0.2:1.000 0.3:1.000 0.5:1.000 0.7:0.847 1:0.489; n=3: 0.02:0.975 0.05:0.945 0.1:0.881 0.2:0.797 0.3:0.690 0.5:0.453 0.7:0.244 1:0.043; n=4: 0.02:0.941 0.05:0.865 0.1:0.735 0.2:0.520 0.3:0.329 0.5:0.108 0.7:0.019 1:0.001; n=5: 0.02:0.896 0.05:0.755 0.1:0.526 0.2:0.275 0.3:0.130 0.5:0.020 0.7:0.001 1:0.000; n=6: 0.02:0.807 0.05:0.575 0.1:0.388 0.2:0.090 0.3:0.025 0.5:0.000 0.7:0.000 1:0.000

    The route round that rates cannot avoid

    A table of yearly moves between states came from steady rates only if it is the exponential of a rate matrix. With two states that is true of half of all tables, with three of one in twenty-four, with four of about one in two thousand, and of none of 400,000 tables drawn at random with five. Even a table that is nine parts staying put fails more and more often as states are added, and always for one reason: rates that carry 1 to 2 and 2 to 3 also carry 1 to 3, and a table whose direct move is rarer than that route round cannot have come from them.

    part 9 · analysis
  10. Root two, raised to itself for ever. The cobweb of x to the power of root two from 1: 1.00000, 1.41421, 1.63253, 1.76084, 1.84091, 1.89271, 1.92700, settling on 2; the other solution 4 repels, with slope ln 4.

    Root two, raised to itself for ever

    Stack √2 to the power √2 to the power √2 without end and the tower settles at exactly 2. Solve the equation for a tower equal to 4 and √2 appears again, and that answer is false. The bases that give a limit run from e^(−e) to e^(1/e), the slope at the crossing decides everything, and a sum over labelled trees turns out to be the same number.

    part 10 · analysis

All series