Series

Quantifiers — the series

4 essays on one idea, from the one that introduces it to the one that assumes the rest.
  1. j is one more than i, counting round — as a grid, with both quantifier readings. A grid of marks for a relation, with the row and column facts the two quantifier orders ask about.

    Every row, or one column

    For every person there is someone who loves them, and there is someone who loves everyone, are the same six words in a different order. Draw the relation as a grid and they become two obviously different questions — one about rows, one about columns.

    part 1 · logic
  2. Six sentences from two quantifiers, and which imply which. A diagram of the six sentences that can be built from two quantifiers and a relation, arranged from strongest to weakest with arrows for implication, each labelled with how many of the 512 relations on three points satisfy it.

    Six sentences from two quantifiers

    One relation, two variables, 'for every' and 'there is': there are eight ways to arrange them and six different sentences come out. Which of them imply which is a small, complete diagram, found by checking all 512 relations on three points — and the diagram crosses over in the middle, which is where every confusion about the order of quantifiers lives.

    part 2 · logic
  3. "There is an x" is a shadow: x² + ax + 1 = 0 has a solution exactly when |a| ≥ 2. A grid with a horizontal and x vertical, marking the cells the curve x squared plus a x plus one equals zero passes through; beneath it, a strip marking the columns that contain a mark, which are exactly those with a at least two in size.

    A quantifier is a shadow

    'There is an x such that …' asks whether a column of a grid contains a mark — which is the same as asking whether a shape casts a shadow on the axis below it. Over the real numbers every such shadow can be described without the quantifier, by polynomial inequalities: 'x² + ax + 1 = 0 has a solution' is just a² ≥ 4. Over the whole numbers the same kind of shadow can carve out the primes, and any set a computer can list.

    part 3 · logic
  4. Whole-number points in a strip, and the shadow they cast. The lattice points satisfying 2x ≤ 5y ≤ 2x + 1 for x from 0 to 30, and their projection onto the x-axis, which repeats every 5.

    Arithmetic with addition alone

    Over the real numbers, a quantifier's shadow is described by inequalities. Over the whole numbers with addition and multiplication, a shadow can be any set a computer can list. In between lies arithmetic with addition and no multiplication, and there the shadows are always the same kind of thing: a finite exception, then a pattern that repeats. The whole numbers made from coins worth 6, 9 and 20 are every number from 44 on; the squares, which need multiplication, never repeat at all.

    part 4 · logic

All series