Partitions — the series
-
A diagram turned on its side
Write a partition as rows of dots, then read the columns instead. Every theorem in this essay is that one move, and the move proves things that no formula suggests.
-
Every partition, hidden in a product
Multiply out one factor for each part size and the coefficient of q to the n is the number of partitions of n. Nothing is being approximated: the product is a bookkeeping device that does the counting by multiplying.
-
The terms that cancel almost everything
Multiply out the product of 1 − q, 1 − q², 1 − q³ and so on, and nearly every coefficient is zero. What survives is a single plus or minus one at 1, 2, 5, 7, 12, 15 — and the reason is a way of pairing partitions off so that each pair cancels.
-
The size of a number with no formula
There is no closed expression for the number of partitions of n. There is an expression for how large it is — with a square root in the exponent and a π in front — and it is accurate enough that rounding a few terms of its refinement gives the exact count.
-
Every fifth one divides
p(4) is 5, p(9) is 30, p(14) is 135, and every partition count at a number leaving four on division by five is divisible by five. Ramanujan read it off a table; the explanation is a way of splitting those partitions into five equal heaps.
-
The shape a random partition takes
There are about twenty-four thousand billion billion billion ways to write 1,000 as a sum of whole numbers. Pick one at random, draw its Ferrers diagram, shrink it by the square root of a thousand, and it is almost exactly the curve e^(−cx) + e^(−cy) = 1 with c = π/√6. So is the next one, and the next. A random partition of a large number has a shape, and the shape is known exactly.
-
Two counts that agree for no visible reason
Write 10 as a sum of whole numbers that differ from each other by at least two, and there are six ways. Write 10 as a sum of numbers that each leave 1 or 4 on division by 5, and there are six ways. The same happens for 20 (thirty-one each), for 40 (three hundred and seventy-four each), for every number anyone has checked and every number there is. The two lists look nothing alike, and no one has found a simple way to turn one into the other.