Covering spaces — the series
-
The same loop, unrolled
Spread a circle out into a line spiralling above it, and a loop that closes downstairs becomes a path that does not — so a question about which loops can be shrunk becomes a question about where a path ends, which is easy.
-
The subgroup that is freer than the group
A free group on two letters contains a subgroup of index three that is free on four. Nothing about a group makes that plausible; everything about a graph makes it obvious, and the argument is to stop looking at the group and start looking at the space whose loops it is.
-
The symmetries a cover has of its own
A covering space can be shuffled without disturbing anything below it, and how many ways there are is decided by the subgroup it corresponds to. When there are as many symmetries as sheets the covering is called regular, and that is the same statement as the subgroup being normal.
-
A covering is a permutation
Describing a covering means saying where each loop sends each sheet, which is a permutation for every generator. So a covering of a wedge of circles is nothing but a homomorphism to a symmetric group, and the subgroup it corresponds to is a stabiliser.
-
Folding a graph until it decides
A subgroup of a free group usually arrives as a list of words, and almost nothing about it is readable from the list. Draw the words as loops, merge every pair of edges with the same label leaving one point, and what is left is a machine that decides membership by reading.
-
Covering a surface multiplies its count
A covering of a closed surface is a permutation of the sheets for each edge of the surface's one face — with one condition that a covering of a graph never had to meet. When the condition holds, the cells of the cover can be counted directly, and the count is the base's count times the number of sheets. That multiplication decides which surfaces can cover which, before any cover is built.
-
What a branch point subtracts
Let the sheets of a covering meet at a few points and the count stops multiplying — but it fails by an amount that can be read off each point's permutation. Cut the sphere into a star, lift the cells, and the Riemann–Hurwitz formula falls out of a subtraction. The same count then turns out to be necessary and not sufficient.
-
A count that can say zero
The branched count ends on a list of cycle shapes that passes every test and describes no covering. There is an exact formula for how many coverings a list has — a sum over the character table of a symmetric group — and it returns nought without giving any reason why.