Ulam's spiral to 900
number-spiral is one function. Everything below came out of it during this
build, at parameters taken from the essays rather than invented for this page — so a figure
here is the same figure a reader meets in an essay, and if the generator changes, this page
changes with it.
With nothing chosen
What it checks while it draws
Collected by running the family and recording what it asserted, not written here. The count is how many separate times the claim was put to the test while these drawings were made.
- a marked square holds a prime, and an unmarked one does not ×1
- and 41² is where it fails ×1
- consecutive integers are neighbours on the spiral ×1
- Euler's polynomial is prime for forty values in a row and then is not ×1
- no two integers land on the same square ×1
- the first polynomial really is the prime-richer one over the range drawn ×1
- the sieve starts where the primes do ×1
- there are primes to compare against ×1
Where it is called
Every figure on this list is drawn by the same rule, so a change to the rule changes all of them at once. That is why the list is published.
Counting what has no formula
There is no expression that gives the nth prime, and yet the number of primes below a bound is predictable to within a fraction of a per cent — by a function that is not a formula for the primes but an integral of the wrong-looking quantity.
DiscreteThe primes on a spiral, and a pattern nobody ordered
Wind the whole numbers outward in a square spiral, mark the primes, and they line up on diagonals. The observation is a hundred years old and there is still no proof it means anything.