Concept

Rational number

A number that is one whole number divided by another, such as 3/4 or −7. The rationals are dense — one lies between any two numbers — yet they can be listed one after another, and that combination is what lets a function behave differently at every fraction than it does everywhere else.

Named by 6 essays across 4 fields — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.

Every parity pattern of length up to 12, and each occurring exactly once. A bar for each pattern length, showing the number of distinct parity patterns produced by all remainders of that power of two, which equals the number of remainders at every length.

Every pattern happens exactly once

Choose any sequence of odds and evens and there is exactly one residue class whose orbit follows it, and exactly one fraction that cycles through it forever. The Collatz conjecture is then the statement that only one of those infinitely many cycles is made of whole numbers.

dynamics · Collatz
Thomae's function as a limit of tents, at n = 3 and 8. Continuous functions built from narrow triangles over the fractions, drawn at two stages, with the limit shown as a dot at height 1/q over every fraction p/q: a function continuous at the irrationals and discontinuous at the rationals.

A limit can jump at every fraction

A sequence of continuous functions can settle, point by point, on a function that is discontinuous at every rational number. It cannot settle on one that is discontinuous everywhere — the indicator of the rationals needs two limits in a row, and Riemann's integral cannot follow the second. The line between the two is Baire's theorem, and it measures smallness by gaps rather than by length.

analysis · Uniform convergence
xⁿ is uniform off a strip, with N = 14, 29, 59 for 3 strips. The functions x to the n on the unit interval with a band of half-width 0.05 around zero. For each of 3 strips next to 1, the member at which every later one stays in the band away from the strip.

Uniform, except on a small set

The functions xⁿ settle on their limit at every point and never uniformly — the trouble is all in a strip next to 1. Throw the strip away and the convergence is uniform on what is left, however thin the strip. Egorov proved that this always happens on an interval, Lusin proved the matching fact about a single function, and a bump sliding off along the whole line shows why both need a set of finite length to start from.

analysis · Uniform convergence
Numbers up to 600 that share their abundancy. A scatter of abundancy against n with horizontal segments joining numbers that have exactly the same abundancy.

A ratio nobody else has

Divide the sum of a number's divisors by the number and you get its abundancy: 2 for every perfect number, 12/5 for both 30 and 140. Numbers that share an abundancy are called friends. Some numbers provably have no friend at all, most have friends only far away — and for 10, whose abundancy is 9/5, nobody knows whether a friend exists.

number · Perfect numbers
1 + 2 + 4 + … in two notions of size. Two sets of points against the number of terms up to 20 on an axis whose gridlines are powers of 2: the partial sums' ordinary size rising, their 2-adic distance from −1 falling.

A series that converges to minus one

1 + 2 + 4 + 8 + … runs off to infinity, and yet the formula for a geometric series says it should equal 1/(1 − 2) = −1. Measure size by how many factors of 2 a number has, instead of how large it is, and powers of 2 become small: the series converges, and to exactly −1. The same change of ruler explains why every repeating decimal is a fraction, and why repeating binary digits running off to the left are fractions too.

analysis · Geometric series
A 33 × 32 rectangle cut into 9 unequal squares. A squared rectangle of 9 squares with sides 18, 15, 14, 10, 9, 8, 7, 4, 1, each labelled with its size.

A rectangle made only of squares

A rectangle can be cut into finitely many squares — of any sizes, as many as wanted — exactly when its two sides are in whole-number proportion. Max Dehn proved it in 1903, and the proof that stuck, found by four Cambridge undergraduates in 1940, reads the squares as currents in an electrical circuit.

computation · Scissors congruence

Named alongside it

The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.

ContinuityConvergenceCounterexampleExhaustive searchGeometric seriesModular arithmeticPointwise convergenceUniform convergenceAbundanceBaire categoryBijectionBinary

All concepts