Hensel lemma
Named by 2 essays across one field — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.
A root lifted one digit at a time
On a dial of seven, 3 × 3 is 2. On a dial of forty-nine the square root of 2 must reduce to 3, so there are only seven candidates, and exactly one of them works: 10. On a dial of 343 exactly one lift of 10 works: 108. Each step adds one digit on the left, found by solving a linear equation, and the digits go on for ever — a number …21216213 whose square is 2, in a world where closeness means divisibility by seven.
A number that is its own square
Square 625 and the answer, 390625, ends in 625. Square 9376 and it ends in 9376. Keep extending them and two endless strings of digits appear, running leftward, each equal to its own square — and their product is nought, though neither is. Base ten does this because ten is two times five: a number in base ten is secretly a pair of numbers, one in base two and one in base five, and these two strings are the pair (one, nought) and (nought, one). In a prime base no such thing can happen.
Named alongside it
The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.
LiftingModular arithmeticNewtons methodP adic numbersChinese remainder theoremDerivativeLocal global principleQuadratic residueSquare rootZero divisor