Constructive proof
Named by 2 essays across 2 fields — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.
The middle that is not excluded
Either it is raining or it is not. Drop that as an axiom and what is left is still a logic — one with models made of open sets and of stages of knowledge, in which a set and its negation between them miss the boundary.
Nobody has a reason to run away
A matching is stable when no two people on opposite sides would both rather have each other than what they have — a condition that names nothing to build and everything to rule out. The surprise is that something always satisfies it, however perverse the rankings are made.
Named alongside it
The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.
BijectionBlocking pairCounterexampleDeferred acceptanceDouble negationExcluded middleExistence proofHeyting algebraIntuitionistic logicKripke modelOpen setPreference profile