Algorithm
Named by 9 essays across 5 fields — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.
A price for every person and task
The cheapest assignment can be found without comparing it to any other. Attach a number to each person and each task so that no pair's two numbers exceed its cost, and if the numbers add to an assignment's total, that assignment is cheapest — proved, by an argument that never mentions the alternatives.
A method that is allowed to miss
Bhāskara's cyclic method solves x² − Dy² = 1 by aiming at the wrong target. It keeps a pair a, b with a² − Db² = k for some small k, combines it with a helper chosen so that k can be divided out, and repeats until k is 1. For D = 61 it reaches the ten-digit fundamental solution in 13 steps, where walking the convergents of √61 takes 22 — and for every D up to 100 it is faster.
Matching as they arrive
Applicants arrive one at a time, and each must be given a post or turned away on the spot. Any sensible rule matches at least half as many as the best assignment chosen with hindsight, and an adversary arranging the arrivals can hold every fixed rule to exactly half. Shuffle the posts once, at random, and give each arrival its best-ranked free post: the guarantee rises to 1 − 1/e, about 63%, and no rule of any kind can do better.
Prices the bidders raise
The cheapest assignment is certified by a price on every task, and those prices can be found without anyone in charge. Let each unassigned person bid for the task that suits them best at current prices, raise its price by a little more than it is worth to them over the next best, and wait. The bidding ends, and when the increment is small enough the prices it ends at are a proof of optimality.
The order decides the colours
The simplest way to colour a graph is to take the vertices one at a time and give each the first colour its neighbours are not already using. It never needs more than one colour beyond the largest degree — and on a graph that needs only two colours it can be made to use as many as there are vertices on a side, depending on nothing but the order it is handed.
A cube root that looks like chance
The continued fraction of √61 repeats after eleven terms, and every square root's must. The cube root of 2 obeys no such law. Computed exactly, by a method of Lagrange's that never leaves the whole numbers, its terms run 1, 3, 1, 5, 1, 1, 4 … and throw up a 534 at the thirty-fifth place and a 7,451 at the 571st — and in every statistic anyone has measured, they look like the terms of a number picked at random.
Four lists find a collision sooner
Two lists of random 24-bit strings need about four thousand entries each before some string appears in both — the birthday bound. Ask instead for one string from each of four lists whose exclusive-or is zero, and lists of a few hundred suffice, because merging the lists in pairs manufactures the near-misses a direct search would have to find by luck. David Wagner's algorithm turns the square root into a cube root, and more lists into smaller roots.
A cut that gets sharper as the map gets lazier
Iterating a map that shrinks distances by 0.9999 takes 141,254 steps to reach its fixed point to a millionth. Cutting takes six: read the map at one point, and the fixed point must lie on the far side of the line halfway between the point and its image. The cut gets better exactly where iteration gets worse, because a map that barely shrinks puts its fixed point almost on every such line.
A search for room that never ends
The textbook way to find the most that a network can carry is to find any route that still has room, push as much along it as it will take, and repeat until no route has room left. With whole-number capacities that must stop. Give one road a capacity of 0.618…, the golden ratio's reciprocal, and choose the routes badly, and it never stops: every push is positive, the flow converges, and it converges to 4.236 when the network can carry 5. The same choice made carelessly in floating point does stop — because of rounding, at the wrong answer, convinced it has finished.
Named alongside it
The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.
AssignmentCertificateComplementary slacknessContinued fractionsDualityExpectationGreedy algorithmLinear programmingMatchingRandomnessAlgebraic numberBinary